You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: A procedural ruling... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. A procedural ruling...
no decision on "Undergod"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Breaking: SCOTUS reverses pledge ruling. 2dumb2beprez  Jun-14-04 09:47 AM   #0 
  - A procedural ruling...  rfranklin   Jun-14-04 09:49 AM   #1 
  - yeah, they can only put this off for so long  cheezus   Jun-14-04 09:53 AM   #3 
  - grr  shoelace414   Jun-14-04 09:50 AM   #2 
  - They didn't ignore anything!  Hammie   Jun-14-04 03:36 PM   #39 
     - Good explanation  Dorian Gray   Jun-14-04 04:22 PM   #42 
  - haha  Scooter24   Jun-14-04 09:54 AM   #4 
  - Tell that to the Buddhists  Az   Jun-14-04 10:20 AM   #18 
  - Lacks STANDING?  MallRat   Jun-14-04 09:56 AM   #5 
  - All the better IMO  Sliverofhope   Jun-14-04 09:57 AM   #6 
  - Actually, you have a good point.  MallRat   Jun-14-04 10:03 AM   #9 
  - Yeah, its ok, I can handle being oppressed for a bit longer  Az   Jun-14-04 10:11 AM   #14 
  - "In God We Trust"  Squeech   Jun-14-04 10:19 AM   #17 
  - I'm sorry....  Heyo   Jun-14-04 10:41 AM   #23 
  - Then perhaps you should read a little history  Az   Jun-14-04 10:53 AM   #25 
     - Has anyone....  Heyo   Jun-14-04 03:15 PM   #32 
        - Not for lack of trying  Az   Jun-14-04 03:21 PM   #33 
  - unfortunately this church-state thing...  gpandas   Jun-14-04 11:23 AM   #27 
  - I Agree, Too  LoneStarLiberal   Jun-14-04 10:21 AM   #19 
  - agreed  sable302   Jun-14-04 03:22 PM   #34 
  - Is this SCOTUS like POTUS  realpolitik   Jun-14-04 09:59 AM   #7 
  - I figured that would be the ruling  theboss   Jun-14-04 10:00 AM   #8 
  - Judicial equivalent of "hey, look over there!"  Loonman   Jun-14-04 10:03 AM   #10 
  - Only way out they had  Az   Jun-14-04 10:05 AM   #11 
  - This is totally unrelated, but when I see the SCOTUS acronym...  LittleApple81   Jun-14-04 10:09 AM   #12 
  - We don't need this issue now  bluestateguy   Jun-14-04 10:10 AM   #13 
  - Hearts and minds  Az   Jun-14-04 10:17 AM   #15 
     - Exactly how did "we"...  deseo   Jun-14-04 01:03 PM   #31 
        - We  Az   Jun-14-04 03:30 PM   #37 
           - While I agree...  deseo   Jun-14-04 03:56 PM   #40 
  - Was it unanimous? Or 5-4?  Jim__   Jun-14-04 10:19 AM   #16 
  - It was  Scooter24   Jun-14-04 10:22 AM   #20 
  - This Isn't a High-Priority Issue for Me  ribofunk   Jun-14-04 10:32 AM   #21 
  - So they avoided actually ruling on the constitutionality of the pledge.  BurtWorm   Jun-14-04 10:38 AM   #22 
  - Yep. Took the easy way out.  Buzzz   Jun-14-04 12:59 PM   #30 
  - I don't blame the court at all  Cheswick   Jun-14-04 10:52 AM   #24 
  - I remember when the 9th Court first handed out its descision  Az   Jun-14-04 11:01 AM   #26 
  - "vindictiveness in the voices "  RetroLounge   Jun-14-04 12:57 PM   #29 
  - disgusting..  leftyandproud   Jun-14-04 12:50 PM   #28 
  - Sure there is...  yella_dawg   Jun-14-04 03:26 PM   #36 
  - Gee, Isn't This Awful  outinforce   Jun-14-04 03:22 PM   #35 
  - Sorry to rain on your parade... (ah, what the hell. I'm not!)  JCCyC   Jun-14-04 05:28 PM   #43 
  - what a bunch of clownish cowards  librechik   Jun-14-04 03:30 PM   #38 
     - Michael Newdow sucks.  ThePandaBear   Jun-14-04 04:10 PM   #41 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC