You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #132: Sorry but neither one. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #77
132. Sorry but neither one.
As Greg palast put it in a radio interview. Chavez is no socialist. The people of Latin America generally see socialism as the side that lost the cold war. A loser ideology.

Not saying I agree or disagree just that is hte general attitude there.

The ideas of John F Kennedy were not socialist, however. It was common sense. What possible reason does a landowner need to hold land the he can't provide the capital to work for himself when there are thousands of landless peoples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC