You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #89: I don't believe it was stood down [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Beatrix Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
89. I don't believe it was stood down
by order. Here are the rules in the military to stand something down

1. You must have proper authority to give the order.
2. You must be of superior rank to the person you give the order to.
3. In order for a person to accept an order they must A. Know who it came from B. Confirm that person is who they claim and C. Confirm that person has authority to give the order.

So in order for NORAD to be ordered to stand down there would be no "who gave the order?".

First - There is a VERY narrow list of people who have sufficient rank and authority who could POSSIBLY give the order. (see points 1 and 2) So the possiblity is... A. Congress B. The president C. a VERY high ranking military officer. Not exactly a big list now is it? I think we can safely discount choice A.

Second - In order for that order to even be acted on the people at NORAD would HAVE to KNOW who it came from. (they don't exactly obey anonymous phone calls directing them to stand down you know) After this order was given the CO would have to relay the same order to stand down to his underlings. (read, the lower ranked individuals) So, if they were ordered to stand down don't you think at least ONE soldier present would have the fortitude to blow the whistle that they were given such an order? And further, they could name who gave it to them as the order can't by anonymous? Hell, a letter to a US Congress person with spine would be all that was needed. One letter/phone call to Kucinich for example and the whole thing would be blown wide open, and I'm sure Kucinich could arrange for protection of the whistle blower if needed. (i.e. come to congress and we will stand in the middle of the house floor before we say anything)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC