SpiralHawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-20-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 35. or Jon Luc Picard - of the Enterprise |
|
One thing about Moore's film: apparently it makes plain that Commander Smirky sat on his butt reading My Pet Goat to some schoolkids for at least 7 minutes after learning that the nation was under attack on 9/11.
Anyone taking in that plain fact, has to wonder about keeping Massive Incompetent Failure Bushy at the helm of the USA Ship of State for another 4 year term.
How could Bush fail America so pathetically in our hour of extrme crisis? With Moore's new movie, everyone will be asking that question -- no matter what wing of whatever political party.
|
| -Jean-Luc Godard chides Moore |
sundog |
May-20-04 08:55 AM |
#0 |
 -
Sounds like Jealousy.. |
KissMyAsscroft |
May-20-04 08:56 AM |
#1 |
  -
Godard jealous of Michael Moore? |
markses |
May-20-04 08:59 AM |
#3 |
| -
Yes. He's jealous. Even legendary auteurs get it sometimes. |
Screaming Lord Byron |
May-20-04 09:03 AM |
#6 |
| -
You've got a point |
sundog |
May-20-04 09:10 AM |
#9 |
| -
He's jealous because outside of film buffs |
RummyTheDummy |
May-20-04 08:28 PM |
#43 |
| -
You may believe that |
markses |
May-20-04 08:50 PM |
#49 |
| -
I stand by my statement |
RummyTheDummy |
May-20-04 08:55 PM |
#50 |
| -
Godard's film is being screened "outside of the competition" |
Bridget Burke |
May-20-04 08:57 AM |
#2 |
| -
I know I'll get flamed by the Moore cheerleaders.... |
vi5 |
May-20-04 08:59 AM |
#4 |
| -
I agree |
markses |
May-20-04 09:10 AM |
#10 |
| -
"rhetorical acts with particular effects" |
Bridget Burke |
May-20-04 09:34 AM |
#17 |
| -
Moore's smart enough to know he's using rhetorical techniques ... |
Lisa |
May-20-04 06:05 PM |
#27 |
| -
Appealing to emotion |
markses |
May-20-04 06:32 PM |
#31 |
| -
how about if the argument is meant to be based on logic? |
Lisa |
May-20-04 07:07 PM |
#32 |
| -
Well, since we were discussing |
markses |
May-20-04 07:23 PM |
#37 |
| -
okay, so that's it ... |
Lisa |
May-20-04 07:36 PM |
#39 |
| -
you also have a point |
sundog |
May-20-04 09:30 AM |
#14 |
| -
Allegory is wasted upon American movie-goers |
gottaB |
May-20-04 07:36 PM |
#38 |
| -
Totally agree. & to think Godard would be jealous of Moore is to not know |
Tinoire |
May-20-04 09:31 AM |
#15 |
| -
Wasn't he on Star Trek--The Next Generation? |
RummyTheDummy |
May-20-04 08:31 PM |
#44 |
| -
That's what I saw in Mike Malloy |
DS1 |
May-20-04 09:38 AM |
#18 |
| -
Good points, vi5 |
alarcoeg |
May-20-04 06:30 PM |
#30 |
| -
Unfortunately, filmmakers like Moore have more impact than Godard |
Snellius |
May-20-04 08:18 PM |
#41 |
| -
Ahh yes |
RummyTheDummy |
May-20-04 08:44 PM |
#47 |
| -
Hmmmmm |
RummyTheDummy |
May-20-04 08:41 PM |
#46 |
| -
I wish he would elaborate |
Cocoa |
May-20-04 09:01 AM |
#5 |
| -
Probably by throwing red meat to the RW base. |
RUMMYisFROSTED |
May-20-04 09:04 AM |
#7 |
| -
that's very abstract |
Cocoa |
May-20-04 09:12 AM |
#11 |
| -
Well, it is Godard. (abstract) |
RUMMYisFROSTED |
May-20-04 09:34 AM |
#16 |
| -
I don't think so |
Corgigal |
May-20-04 09:04 AM |
#8 |
| -
Okay here is the part where Fox has to quote someone named Jean-Luc |
underpants |
May-20-04 09:13 AM |
#12 |
| -
yes |
sundog |
May-20-04 09:23 AM |
#13 |
| -
They will refer to him as |
tishaLA |
May-20-04 09:39 AM |
#19 |
| -
i'm getting |
sundog |
May-20-04 09:40 AM |
#21 |
| -
or Jon Luc Picard - of the Enterprise |
SpiralHawk |
May-20-04 07:15 PM |
#35 |
| -
on other hand, by slamming Moore, Godard has done what? |
DS1 |
May-20-04 09:40 AM |
#20 |
| -
i don't think it's calculated |
sundog |
May-20-04 09:45 AM |
#24 |
| -
but catch what? As underpants noted, he's French, so he can't be right |
DS1 |
May-20-04 09:52 AM |
#26 |
| -
Watch Bowling for Columbine - Watch Weekend |
soleft |
May-20-04 09:41 AM |
#22 |
| -
Then watch 'Sympathy for the Devil' |
Screaming Lord Byron |
May-20-04 09:47 AM |
#25 |
| -
That was a stinker. |
RandomKoolzip |
May-20-04 06:22 PM |
#29 |
| -
this has to be filtered through Godard's theoretical perspective |
56kid |
May-20-04 09:41 AM |
#23 |
| -
What the fuck???? |
Egalitarian Zetetic |
May-20-04 06:10 PM |
#28 |
| -
"although he admitted that he had not seen it" |
Selwynn |
May-20-04 07:08 PM |
#33 |
| -
Godard needs to see the movie first. Just because Moore is a fat American |
AP |
May-20-04 07:10 PM |
#34 |
| -
The reviews I have read note that Moore does not do as much |
demgrrrll |
May-20-04 07:22 PM |
#36 |
| -
Moore doesn't appear on screen as much. But, the whole thing is |
AP |
May-20-04 11:18 PM |
#51 |
| -
If he runs a scene without comment then it is up to the viewer to decide |
demgrrrll |
May-20-04 11:39 PM |
#54 |
| -
Even if he narrates a scene, it's still upt to the viewer what opinion... |
AP |
May-20-04 11:55 PM |
#55 |
| -
But Godard also participated in |
tishaLA |
May-20-04 08:37 PM |
#45 |
| -
I'm just guessing, but I'm just so sure that he's saying that you can't... |
AP |
May-20-04 11:27 PM |
#52 |
| -
As An Art Critic, I Am Appalled That He Hasn't Seen The Film |
cryingshame |
May-20-04 07:55 PM |
#40 |
| -
The typical Heathers in this thread are dissing Moore |
trumad |
May-20-04 08:26 PM |
#42 |
| -
It's possible that he tried to make that clear, but that the press... |
AP |
May-20-04 11:29 PM |
#53 |
| -
Godard is a walking, talking example of why the French should never |
John_H |
May-20-04 08:50 PM |
#48 |
| -
"Just spell my name right. Eisner hates me too. I'll be here all week."JLG |
TacticalPeak |
May-21-04 12:25 AM |
#56 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread