You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: because the issue isn't ripe for them yet [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. because the issue isn't ripe for them yet
Edited on Sun May-16-04 11:33 PM by dsc
States issue marriage licences, and in point of fact, DOMA doesn't ban them from doing that. But once the licences are issued everything changes if people decide to sue. Both MA couples can sue to get federal benefits and couples from elsewhere can sue to get recognition (both denied by DOMA) but the mere issuance of those licences isn't a federal issue which is why the court didn't intervene. In short, the fact they didn't stop the licences doesn't mean they will overturn DOMA.

On edit I highly suspect that no one will file a case until after the election and only if Kerry wins. We got burnt bigtime once in 1986 on Bowers v Hardwick when we sued too soon. I don't think that mistake will happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why hasn't their been a federal challenge to the DOMA? Solon  May-16-04 10:54 PM   #0 
  - A person has to have standing to do the challenge  dsc   May-16-04 10:56 PM   #1 
  - I was thinking if a gay couple tried to get a license  Solon   May-16-04 11:03 PM   #5 
     - only at the state level  dsc   May-16-04 11:19 PM   #7 
  - You need an attempt to give full faith and credit to the marriage  MikeG   May-16-04 10:58 PM   #2 
  - Because there isn't any state-sanctioned gay marriages...yet.  DRoseDARs   May-16-04 10:58 PM   #3 
  - that has nothing to do with it  dsc   May-16-04 11:00 PM   #4 
     - Well if no state has gay marriages, how can someone "have standing"?  DRoseDARs   May-16-04 11:12 PM   #6 
        - as of 19 miutes ago MA has gay marraige  dsc   May-16-04 11:20 PM   #8 
           - So where was your disagreement with me?  DRoseDARs   May-16-04 11:24 PM   #9 
              - because the issue isn't ripe for them yet  dsc   May-16-04 11:28 PM   #10 
                 - You need an attempt to recognize the mariage in another state.  MikeG   May-16-04 11:52 PM   #12 
  - Well it is about to be challenged.  foreigncorrespondent   May-16-04 11:40 PM   #11 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC