You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: Respectfully, and vehemently, disagree [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
47. Respectfully, and vehemently, disagree
I'm not above saying that the government isn't capable of some crooked shit, but my God, not this. I have looked at the video, and the assertions that the "gestures, and hand movements" insinuate that it is Americans doing this is dubious, at best, IMHO.

Arabs are very fair skinned, and caucasians can be very dark skinned (think Michael Jackson vs. George Hamilton). I don't mean to be funny over a subject as mortifying ans sober as this, I'm just trying to illustrate my point.

And I will even put on a tinfoil hat and go along with this for just a minute. Suppose it was caucasians that did this? What proof do you have that it was Americans in general, or the CIA in particular, that did this? Are there not European Muslims (Chechnya, Bosnia) who might hav ehheded the call to jihad and gone to Iraq, like many Muslims have? You could probably fins just as many "experts" that would swear it was Europeans, or Arabs, just as you're sure they're Americans. The timing may support a deflection of the Abu Ghairb story to get it off the front page, but in the Arab culture, an insult to their culture must be answered quickly and definitively, or face more shame, as I understand it. (And I in no way claim to be an expert on the culture of the middle east, so if I am wrong, please correct me). So the quick appearance of the Berg video could plausibly be explained that way, also.

Just because you want to believe that ther CIA was behind this, doesn't mean it is so. Until I see solid, irrefutable proof, I will file this in the "tinfoil hat" file.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC