You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: Bev, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. Bev,
Ka-BLAM!! But it goes, I'll wager, even deeper than you or any of us have yet proven. Although, I must say, the information trail you've uncovered is certainly a very interesting path to tread.

I'll be looking for your book :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Voting Company Reverses Stand: Flawed software WAS used BevHarris  Aug-04-03 10:28 PM   #0 
  - Update from Hopkins researchers: Diebold's arguments often miss the point  BevHarris   Aug-04-03 10:31 PM   #1 
  - Bev, just want to commend you once again. Regarding that insane thread  TruthIsAll   Aug-04-03 10:58 PM   #15 
     - Yes, Bev, major kudos to you and if this timing helps your book,  SharonAnn   Aug-04-03 11:09 PM   #16 
     - Timing  Eloriel   Aug-05-03 08:34 AM   #83 
  - this is going to be in my reps' fax machines STAT  arcane1   Aug-04-03 10:32 PM   #2 
  - Invadlidate any 2002 elections?  Eloriel   Aug-04-03 10:48 PM   #10 
     - Good point.  ozymandius   Aug-04-03 11:18 PM   #22 
  - Thanks Bev!  neuvocat   Aug-04-03 10:33 PM   #3 
  - Great job, Bev! n/t  kainah   Aug-04-03 10:34 PM   #4 
  - Wow  T Roosevelt   Aug-04-03 10:37 PM   #5 
  - I swear these "voting" machine  dusty64   Aug-04-03 10:38 PM   #6 
  - For those of us who have worked for large tech companies  SharonAnn   Aug-04-03 11:11 PM   #20 
     - ROFLMAO!  ParanoidPat   Aug-05-03 03:07 AM   #77 
     - Right SharonAnn, then they throw in the cost factor  dmr   Aug-05-03 03:25 AM   #80 
  - Bev, Check Out the Boston Story  RedEagle   Aug-04-03 10:43 PM   #7 
  - LHS Associates = Diebold Distributor  DEMActivist   Aug-04-03 10:48 PM   # 
  - He is a Diebold distributor. His web site links straight to Diebold  BevHarris   Aug-04-03 10:51 PM   #12 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-04-03 11:09 PM   #18 
        - Quoting an article in the Boston Globe  BevHarris   Aug-04-03 11:19 PM   #23 
        - I think that may be  kgfnally   Aug-05-03 12:22 AM   #41 
        - Bet the Reporter Mixed up LHS and Diebold  RedEagle   Aug-04-03 11:24 PM   #27 
        - He is the Diebold rep in Boston.  BevHarris   Aug-04-03 11:26 PM   #29 
        - Bev,  kgfnally   Aug-05-03 12:17 AM   #40 
        - no kidding  TinfoilHatProgrammer   Aug-05-03 12:39 AM   #47 
           - What was posted was a direct quote from a newspaper article  DEMActivist   Aug-05-03 12:43 AM   #48 
           - no problem with the reporter  TinfoilHatProgrammer   Aug-05-03 12:52 AM   #51 
              - The "hypocrisy" you refer to was in reference to THAT article.  ibegurpard   Aug-05-03 12:58 AM   #54 
           - Wow, TinFoil.....you have made my day!  DagmarK   Aug-05-03 02:55 AM   #73 
           - really, let's be accurate  TinfoilHatProgrammer   Aug-05-03 03:17 AM   #79 
              - Now, let's ACTUALLY be accurate here.  stickdog   Aug-06-03 02:42 AM   #94 
           - There's a huge difference between  Eloriel   Aug-05-03 08:48 AM   #84 
           - Speaking of hypocrites,  stickdog   Aug-06-03 02:36 AM   #93 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-04-03 11:35 PM   #30 
  - Has there been any  liberalnproud   Aug-04-03 10:48 PM   #8 
  - Here are some interesting state-wide results for ya  Eloriel   Aug-04-03 10:53 PM   #14 
     - This is another interesting probabilities question  Pobeka   Aug-04-03 11:24 PM   #28 
     - The probability of NO fraud: 1 out of 43,040 (conservatively)  TruthIsAll   Aug-05-03 12:07 AM   #39 
        - Yeah, but  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 12:23 AM   #42 
        - Show this to your stat prof. He will agree the analysis is correct.  TruthIsAll   Aug-05-03 12:31 AM   #45 
        - No, I don't believe -- here's why  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 12:38 AM   #46 
           - Wrong. I chose the races which were hotly contested and  TruthIsAll   Aug-05-03 12:52 AM   #52 
              - OK, I understand you''ve been through this before, but 1 *burning* ??  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 12:57 AM   #53 
              - A subjective consideration.......  DagmarK   Aug-05-03 03:03 AM   #75 
              - I'm mostly with you, Pebeka  gristy   Aug-05-03 06:24 PM   #90 
              - this is subjective  gristy   Aug-05-03 06:30 PM   #91 
        - Where did you drum up such an idea? All elections are separate events.  shance   Aug-05-03 02:16 AM   #68 
        - Polls versus elections  bumbler   Aug-05-03 06:06 PM   #88 
        - You should know better  bumbler   Aug-05-03 12:48 AM   #49 
           - So what do you think of my post #42?  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 12:51 AM   #50 
           - Bumbler, listen up.  TruthIsAll   Aug-05-03 01:10 AM   #55 
           - OK TIA, I see it now.  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 01:19 AM   #56 
           - Pobeka, welcome to DU! I'm glad we agree; your post was legit.  TruthIsAll   Aug-05-03 01:29 AM   #58 
           - Pobeka, welcome to DU! I'm glad we agree; your post was legit.  TruthIsAll   Aug-05-03 01:29 AM   #59 
              - But now the challenge  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 01:37 AM   #60 
                 - The Georgia races are online...  DEMActivist   Aug-05-03 01:41 AM   #62 
                    - How about relavent poll results?  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 01:45 AM   #64 
           - You confuse MOE of the poll with actual voting.  gbwarming   Aug-05-03 01:39 AM   #61 
           - Depends on the poll question  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 01:43 AM   #63 
              - No actually, that's not correct  gbwarming   Aug-05-03 02:00 AM   #65 
                 - It's late, and my brain is slowing up :-)  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 02:08 AM   #67 
                 - You're quite right about the MOE being the fudge factor...  punpirate   Aug-05-03 02:23 AM   #70 
                    - MOE isn't a fudge factor.  gbwarming   Aug-05-03 03:03 AM   #76 
                       - I don't think you read what I said.  punpirate   Aug-05-03 03:42 AM   #82 
           - All the SHOUTING  bumbler   Aug-05-03 03:37 AM   #81 
           - Well, yes, no, maybe...  punpirate   Aug-05-03 02:04 AM   #66 
              - As usual, you have a lot of good thoughts here  Pobeka   Aug-05-03 02:23 AM   #69 
              - Nah, the simulation says enough...  punpirate   Aug-05-03 02:50 AM   #72 
              - OK, now let me complicate it a bit more for you.  DEMActivist   Aug-05-03 02:25 AM   #71 
                 - I read, a week or so ago...  punpirate   Aug-05-03 03:15 AM   #78 
     - Blagojevich won  dansolo   Aug-04-03 11:35 PM   #31 
     - At any time, did a Diebold machine  aquart   Aug-05-03 02:47 PM   #86 
     - At least 4 times that I remember  SoCalDem   Aug-05-03 02:58 PM   #87 
     - I am on democracy's side.  gristy   Aug-05-03 06:22 PM   #89 
  - "Kinks"  Generic Other   Aug-04-03 10:48 PM   #9 
  - Absolutely stunning piece of work and research. But beyond showing  acmavm   Aug-04-03 10:50 PM   #11 
  - Uhhh  Eloriel   Aug-04-03 11:09 PM   #17 
  - The software came from....!  xcentrik   Aug-04-03 10:51 PM   #13 
  - You may be one of few who didn't know that before  Eloriel   Aug-04-03 11:11 PM   #19 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-05-03 01:26 AM   #57 
  - Is it too late to add this to your book?  ozymandius   Aug-04-03 11:15 PM   #21 
  - I know the feeling well  DEMActivist   Aug-04-03 11:41 PM   #32 
  - WhoooHoooo Bev! You've got Diebold on the run, as well  Vadem   Aug-04-03 11:19 PM   #24 
  - This Kiffmeyer cookie in GA says-  party_line   Aug-04-03 11:20 PM   #25 
  - Kiffmeyer is in Minnesota, I believe...  punpirate   Aug-04-03 11:42 PM   #33 
  - ELECTION 2002: ELECTRONIC VOTING: Glitches mar day for new system  DEMActivist   Aug-04-03 11:47 PM   #34 
  - And some more "without a hitch" stories  DEMActivist   Aug-04-03 11:50 PM   #35 
  - And another....  DEMActivist   Aug-04-03 11:52 PM   #36 
  - Kiffmeyer is the Repug Secretary of State of MINNESOTA  scarletwoman   Aug-04-03 11:56 PM   #37 
  - Fabulous job, Bev!  SnohoDem   Aug-04-03 11:22 PM   #26 
  - A way to give this story some real legs...  SimpleMan   Aug-05-03 12:00 AM   #38 
  - A big fat  alfredo   Aug-05-03 12:26 AM   #43 
  - Whoah ... was there a reversal?  Fredda Weinberg   Aug-05-03 12:29 AM   #44 
  - You can rest easy, Fredda.  stickdog   Aug-06-03 02:47 AM   #95 
  - Encouraging news.Justice is about to turn the corner and run to dayligh  oasis   Aug-05-03 02:57 AM   #74 
  - Giving a kick so I can find later...  4dog   Aug-05-03 01:39 PM   #85 
     - Good research on a most important issue. (eom)  oasis   Aug-06-03 01:54 AM   #92 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC