You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #5: hmmmm. i don't think so. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. hmmmm. i don't think so.
i have friends who were more or less on the sidelines when that was going on....i think it was what it was supposed to be...two mid-20s reporters hungry as hell who got their hackles up by stonewalling attempts, and went on 24-hour alert, pounding on doors and poring over records til they found the nuggets they needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Anyone find it interesting how Woodward has been presaging these stories? jpgray  Apr-10-04 04:51 PM   #0 
  - perhaps...wouldn't it be nice....if he returned to the young pit bull..  MnFats   Apr-10-04 04:55 PM   #1 
  - I think Woodward was there to get Nixon out for someone else  jpgray   Apr-10-04 04:56 PM   #3 
  - hmmmm. i don't think so.  MnFats   Apr-10-04 05:00 PM   #5 
  - Woodward had *very* unusual access for a reporter in his twenties  jpgray   Apr-10-04 05:02 PM   #7 
  - Not very likely. Read this link on Woodward...  Media_Lies_Daily   Apr-10-04 08:09 PM   #22 
  - Now you must remember who and what Nixon was  keithyboy   Apr-10-04 05:06 PM   #8 
     - Interesting point, Keithyboy...  loudsue   Apr-10-04 05:19 PM   #13 
     - Bush supports the idea of "The Rapture"  TexasBushwhacker   Apr-10-04 07:35 PM   #18 
  - A little tidbit Drudge has out tonight  rmpalmer   Apr-10-04 08:00 PM   #20 
  - "Woodward seemed quite the Bush lapdog"  nostamj   Apr-10-04 04:56 PM   #2 
  - Some doubt has now been cast on the accuracy of 'All the President's Men'  jpgray   Apr-10-04 05:13 PM   #10 
  - I remember when "Bush at War" came out, the WH was pissed  worldgonekrazy   Apr-10-04 08:06 PM   #21 
  - Do it, Bob.  reprehensor   Apr-10-04 04:57 PM   #4 
  - 10 days from now  truizm   Apr-10-04 05:01 PM   #6 
     - Interesting that people who "bought this book" also...  eleny   Apr-10-04 05:30 PM   #14 
        - I can't wait to see the coverage  jpgray   Apr-10-04 05:49 PM   #15 
        - One thing worth noting:  calimary   Apr-10-04 07:18 PM   #17 
  - not sure but I am preordering the book now  crozet4clark   Apr-10-04 05:08 PM   #9 
  - Aren't there rumors that Woodward is CIA?  Stephanie   Apr-10-04 05:16 PM   #11 
  - All speculation, near as I can tell (nt)  jpgray   Apr-10-04 05:17 PM   #12 
  - WOODWARD WAS/IS A SPOOK  CaptainMidnight   Apr-10-04 07:01 PM   #16 
     - um hmm  beam_me_up   Apr-10-04 07:39 PM   #19 
        - Maybe you ought to read my Post #22.  Media_Lies_Daily   Apr-10-04 08:11 PM   #23 
           - Thanks  beam_me_up   Apr-10-04 08:30 PM   #24 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC