slinkerwink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-07-04 03:13 AM
Response to Original message |
| -Why is fag banned but bitch allowed? |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 01:28 AM |
#0 |
 -
Whoo - where's my kevlar suit? |
Susang |
Apr-07-04 01:31 AM |
#1 |
  -
I am using it in the Lounge |
ZombyWoof |
Apr-07-04 01:51 AM |
#16 |
| -
You cannot be serious! |
dogonarug |
Apr-07-04 07:23 AM |
#53 |
| -
Heathens. PLATYPUSES are above all! (nt) |
JCCyC |
Apr-07-04 09:47 AM |
#67 |
| -
Is it banned? |
FDRrocks |
Apr-07-04 01:32 AM |
#2 |
| -
Calling a person a fag when your intent is to insult them is. |
bezdomny |
Apr-07-04 01:34 AM |
#3 |
| -
to see what I am speaking of look at any one of the 8 threads |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 01:35 AM |
#4 |
| -
Those threads were about |
FDRrocks |
Apr-07-04 01:36 AM |
#5 |
| -
you misread the post.....it was about banning the word in its |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 01:37 AM |
#6 |
| -
and this is what Skinner said in his original post |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 01:39 AM |
#8 |
| -
I'm curious...you seem to love bandying the word about |
RapidCreek |
Apr-07-04 03:45 AM |
#35 |
| -
No they or at least the 8th one, wasn't |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 01:38 AM |
#7 |
| -
that's where the miscommunication happened |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 01:40 AM |
#9 |
| -
I didn't see any of the first seven threads |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 01:41 AM |
#10 |
| -
I think he said the same thing in the last seven threads |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 01:46 AM |
#11 |
| -
You are being very generous |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 02:08 AM |
#20 |
| -
I think people totally overreacted, or that they wanted to |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 02:22 AM |
#23 |
| -
yes but |
nayt |
Apr-07-04 06:02 AM |
#49 |
| -
you're right----it is sexist |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 03:08 PM |
#88 |
| -
A better contrasting term to "bitch" would be "nob" or "dick" |
sweetheart |
Apr-07-04 01:47 AM |
#12 |
| -
um, there's a reason why "fag" is banned here, and it's not because |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 01:49 AM |
#14 |
| -
O/T but... |
rabid_nerd |
Apr-07-04 01:47 AM |
#13 |
| -
Think there's an EIGHT PAGE thread for this already... |
Selwynn |
Apr-07-04 01:50 AM |
#15 |
| -
Did you read my post |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 01:51 AM |
#17 |
| -
I did indeed...I love it how just becuase I don't share your view... |
Selwynn |
Apr-07-04 02:18 AM |
#22 |
| -
that little "x" button next to threads can be useful |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 02:33 AM |
#27 |
| -
Words have meaning |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 09:51 AM |
#68 |
| -
Well, its a new day, and you're still not correct. |
Selwynn |
Apr-07-04 10:11 AM |
#73 |
| -
kick for clarification of skinner's post |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 02:06 AM |
#18 |
| -
The predominant view is that... |
TreasonousBastard |
Apr-07-04 02:07 AM |
#19 |
| -
This has been long overdue |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 02:12 AM |
#21 |
| -
and the fact that this issue keeps coming back shows that the |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 02:23 AM |
#24 |
| -
the very first time i heard the word nigger was by a white man |
bearfartinthewoods |
Apr-07-04 07:53 AM |
#54 |
| -
Well, whether it's a choice or not, it's still insulting someone |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 02:24 AM |
#25 |
| -
that's why the main definition of the word "bitch" should not be allowed |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 02:27 AM |
#26 |
| -
Goddammit Slink |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 03:28 AM |
#30 |
| -
i think slink might mean this |
corporatewhore |
Apr-07-04 03:37 AM |
#31 |
| -
bravo! it is against her gender-----not because she "happens" |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 03:43 AM |
#32 |
| -
No, it's not. Men acting that way would get exactly the same |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 04:09 AM |
#37 |
| -
no, when men are called "bitch" it means that they're weak or |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 04:17 AM |
#38 |
| -
I don't think it's so much... |
theHandpuppet |
Apr-07-04 06:45 AM |
#50 |
| -
Better yet, let me give you some examples of sexism, |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 04:28 AM |
#41 |
| -
maybe you should add men telling women what sexism is |
corporatewhore |
Apr-07-04 04:40 AM |
#43 |
| -
I'm telling EVERYONE that. |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 04:44 AM |
#44 |
| -
Oh, and I forgot to add the draft as being sexist |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 04:46 AM |
#45 |
| -
The draft if they drafted both sexes or only one goes against feminist |
corporatewhore |
Apr-07-04 04:49 AM |
#46 |
| -
Why, are women the exclusive arbiters of what constitutes sexism? |
RapidCreek |
Apr-07-04 05:50 AM |
#48 |
| -
not exclusive |
bearfartinthewoods |
Apr-07-04 08:03 AM |
#55 |
| -
Touche'! |
theHandpuppet |
Apr-07-04 06:47 AM |
#51 |
| -
And HOW do you think all those lacks of "freedom" come to be? |
Kanary |
Apr-07-04 09:12 AM |
#61 |
| -
I'm well aware of the mechanism behind |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 09:26 AM |
#62 |
| -
You're well aware of it, |
Kanary |
Apr-07-04 09:58 AM |
#71 |
| -
Yeah...BTW the ACLU sends its regards. nt |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 10:16 AM |
#76 |
| -
Actually, I happen to know many people in the ACLU here |
Kanary |
Apr-07-04 10:38 AM |
#80 |
| -
You're talking to one. nt |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 10:39 AM |
#81 |
| -
So are you. |
VelmaD |
Apr-07-04 10:41 AM |
#82 |
| -
You are too. Nice try. No dice. |
Kanary |
Apr-07-04 10:42 AM |
#83 |
| -
Okay. I'm lying about being in the ACLU. |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 10:44 AM |
#84 |
| -
Back up the truck |
VelmaD |
Apr-07-04 09:32 AM |
#63 |
| -
Read them both again. |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 09:44 AM |
#66 |
| -
I have to respectfully disagree with you... |
VelmaD |
Apr-07-04 10:00 AM |
#72 |
| -
That's not sexism, either. |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 04:08 AM |
#36 |
| -
no, when men are called bitches, it's to emasculate them, or |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 04:18 AM |
#39 |
| -
when women express a strong political belief we are often times called |
corporatewhore |
Apr-07-04 04:27 AM |
#40 |
| -
find me an example of a man being beaten bloody by a woman |
bearfartinthewoods |
Apr-07-04 08:30 AM |
#57 |
| -
find any dictionary that doesn't include female in the definition. |
bearfartinthewoods |
Apr-07-04 08:14 AM |
#56 |
| -
I don't call women bitches. |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 08:50 AM |
#59 |
| -
I call bullshit |
VelmaD |
Apr-07-04 09:36 AM |
#64 |
| -
Tough. |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 09:53 AM |
#69 |
| -
Many people have gone way past... |
VelmaD |
Apr-07-04 09:57 AM |
#70 |
| -
They didn't start this, though. |
BullGooseLoony |
Apr-07-04 10:13 AM |
#74 |
| -
Trying to untangle... |
VelmaD |
Apr-07-04 10:19 AM |
#78 |
| -
kick |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 02:39 AM |
#28 |
| -
kick |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 03:13 AM |
#29 |
| -
cuz dogs are fine, but cigarettes are bad |
PurityOfEssence |
Apr-07-04 03:43 AM |
#33 |
| -
no, it is based upon the gender, not the behavior |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 03:45 AM |
#34 |
| -
because Cigarettes are bad and Girl puppies are cute. |
GoPsUx |
Apr-07-04 04:31 AM |
#42 |
| -
Why Gay? |
RapidCreek |
Apr-07-04 05:35 AM |
#47 |
| -
"Fag" is a homophobic slur and bitch isn't. |
Plaid Adder |
Apr-07-04 07:15 AM |
#52 |
| -
isn't that pretty much a whose ox is being gored argument? |
dsc |
Apr-07-04 08:40 AM |
#58 |
| -
Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander |
Kanary |
Apr-07-04 10:18 AM |
#77 |
| -
This fag thinks we should stop banning words altogether. |
DemLikr |
Apr-07-04 08:59 AM |
#60 |
| -
Being victims |
WyoMee |
Apr-07-04 09:43 AM |
#65 |
| -
i dont want to be rescued by skinner but i want people to aknowlegde |
corporatewhore |
Apr-07-04 11:12 AM |
#85 |
| -
I want people to realize that, too |
WyoMee |
Apr-07-04 11:32 AM |
#86 |
| -
that has some truth to it but placeing it on the same level as fag |
corporatewhore |
Apr-07-04 11:51 AM |
#87 |
| -
It seems I wasn't clear enough the first time, so let me rephrase - |
Selwynn |
Apr-07-04 10:15 AM |
#75 |
| -
I think we should stop banning all words here |
cally |
Apr-07-04 10:27 AM |
#79 |
| -
kick |
slinkerwink |
Apr-07-04 03:11 PM |
#89 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread