You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #126: males who encounter this ambivalence regularly are type specific [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-03 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #113
126. males who encounter this ambivalence regularly are type specific

let's push the envelop further:

I know for a fact that all women do not play this no yes game... in its most innocent form it is most prevalent in young woman who might well be attracted but still grappling with the all the guilt that is imbred into women regarding their own sexuality and their own desire. In this example the no which requires some persuading is not a game. I mean she is not playing a game. She may very well be youthfully curious, however is hedging because of sexual mores and in that very moment is weighing all the discomfort that goes with this type of ambivalence, and young boys grapple with this in their own way as well.

I feel a male who is older must be sensitive to this and rape will never enter into the picture as long as the girl is of age.

In the more devious scenario where the women is playing a fucked up game (which depending on her own sexual malady she may or may not even be conscious of), this women constitutes a type. Men who find themselves chasing this type women regularly and as regularly find themselves getting biten... this is a whole other thing...

I still have not honed in on, in all instances in terms of this no yes catagory, why those men that seem to persist in their confusion, also do not seem to grasp that if this type women causes confusion... rather than to superimpose her upon all women, why don't they just change their type? This is what I don't understand. Or is this small percentage of males that I allude to: are they just playing a game of their own in these threads?

Because quite frankly their concerns seem to me 1- very selfish 2- irrelevant to the discussion for the most part and 3- are certainly not indicative of ALL women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC