You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Errr... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Cptn Kirk Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Errr...
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 07:11 PM by Cptn Kirk
Actually (contrary to what is shown on TV) you can't just walk in to a court room and say "no person can be denied X." and not back it up. You will have to quote *specific* legal reason behind your statement or you *will* lose in cases like this.

Honestly, I'm not even really sure what you are getting this from, or if such law exists...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -My legal analysis of same sex marriage in CA - Please comment Cptn Kirk  Feb-19-04 06:16 PM   #0 
  - I'm a paralegal who probably knows more law than  liberalhistorian   Feb-19-04 06:26 PM   #1 
  - Good analysis  kanrok   Feb-19-04 06:30 PM   #2 
  - I'm in my 4th year of law school (last year) and...  LawStudentMom   Feb-19-04 06:35 PM   #5 
     - True  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 06:52 PM   #11 
     - You seem to be a good person to ask my question.  StopThief   Feb-19-04 08:04 PM   #21 
  - Um....  LeftCoast   Feb-19-04 06:32 PM   #3 
  - Are you sure?  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 06:42 PM   #7 
  - As far as I know, DOMA only refers to Federal recognition  LeftCoast   Feb-19-04 09:22 PM   #25 
  - crossing the line  DinoBoy   Feb-19-04 06:43 PM   #8 
  - Yes it would  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 06:46 PM   #10 
     - Some het marriages not recognized by other states  lcooksey   Feb-19-04 08:50 PM   #24 
  - Exactly, the same as Mass  BR_Parkway   Feb-19-04 07:24 PM   #14 
  - Not true  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 07:36 PM   #16 
  - No, it could go to the USSC  kiahzero   Feb-19-04 07:41 PM   #18 
  - It sounds circular....  Snow   Feb-19-04 06:33 PM   #4 
  - It sure will.  LawStudentMom   Feb-19-04 06:36 PM   #6 
  - It's not cicular at all  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 06:44 PM   #9 
  - its actually a lot easier than that argument.  kodi   Feb-19-04 07:04 PM   #12 
  - Errr...  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 07:10 PM   #13 
  - Look to CA Perez v Sharp - struck down anti-miscegnation laws  mondo joe   Feb-19-04 07:29 PM   #15 
  - Excellent  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 07:38 PM   #17 
  - Question: Were the anti-miscegenation laws statutes. . .  StopThief   Feb-19-04 08:02 PM   #20 
     - See my response below  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 08:13 PM   #23 
  - I could be wrong, but I believe you are incorrect.  StopThief   Feb-19-04 07:55 PM   #19 
     - I have checked  Cptn Kirk   Feb-19-04 08:06 PM   #22 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC