I am pretty sure I know why bush is upset...but what about this side of the issue: While it may be discriminatory, the current law in CA does prohibit gay marriage, yes? (I am not thoroughly versed in CA law but I think that is what I heard) Aren't the justices and the clerks issuing the licenses breaking the law? I know the judges performing the ceremonies are sworn to uphold the law. What would be said if something like this were going the other way? Where judges we doing something against the law that did not favor a democratic-party issue?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
