MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-24-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 21. Would I drink it? Yes. I drink the tap water in Saint Paul, |
|
and all I have to assure me that it's safe is the water treatment lab. Why do you assume that they'd announce one day that the water was not safe for one specific group, then announce it was back to normal? Not everyone in government is a liar.
Yes, I'd drink it. And I would have done the same on the day they said it was unsafe for infants. I haven't been an infant for almost 65 years, and minuscule amounts of radiation won't have time to cause any cancer in me before I die. So, sure, I'd drink the water, but I'd check daily for the current report.
|
| -Lethal in Japan - the real story on radiation |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 11:47 AM |
#0 |
-
Pseudoscientific nonsense and fearmongering. |
TheWraith |
Mar-24-11 11:54 AM |
#1 |
 -
I knew this would bring out the local nuclear scientists nt |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 11:56 AM |
#2 |
-
I apologize for having passed high school science. |
TheWraith |
Mar-24-11 12:15 PM |
#4 |
-
Go ahead and kill the messenger |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 12:27 PM |
#5 |
-
And a Reichian acupuncturist, too |
Dogmudgeon |
Mar-24-11 01:09 PM |
#6 |
-
That site supplies some good info and some whack info |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 01:38 PM |
#7 |
-
That site is full of shit, and is paid for by ads from quacks. |
MineralMan |
Mar-24-11 02:01 PM |
#10 |
-
Real disinformation: Water not safe for babies! (yesterday) Water safe for babies (today)! nt |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 02:36 PM |
#12 |
-
Yup. The levels of radioactivity are down from yesterday. |
MineralMan |
Mar-24-11 02:48 PM |
#16 |
-
You are over 65, no young kids, you don't live in California |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 05:40 PM |
#18 |
-
As to the drinking water and your confidence, would you drink it? |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 05:47 PM |
#19 |
-
Would I drink it? Yes. I drink the tap water in Saint Paul, |
MineralMan |
Mar-24-11 06:36 PM |
#21 |
-
I believe I can say that I have more at stake in this than most DUers |
Art_from_Ark |
Mar-24-11 08:24 PM |
#23 |
-
are you drinking the tap water? |
tahrir |
Mar-24-11 08:53 PM |
#25 |
-
There was panic buying of bottled water yesterday |
Art_from_Ark |
Mar-24-11 09:08 PM |
#26 |
-
Yes, I have tried the tap water |
Art_from_Ark |
Mar-25-11 12:35 AM |
#27 |
-
Reuters has a good summary of the health effects of isotops such as Caesium |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 12:05 PM |
#3 |
 -
A kilogram of those vegetables daily? |
MineralMan |
Mar-24-11 02:15 PM |
#11 |
-
Vegetables 100-200 km from plant cannot be sold |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 02:37 PM |
#13 |
-
Yes, it's a very bad incident. What would you have me do about |
MineralMan |
Mar-24-11 03:39 PM |
#17 |
-
Naturalnews, eh? |
MineralMan |
Mar-24-11 01:55 PM |
#8 |
 -
Here's another ad from your "reputable" source. |
MineralMan |
Mar-24-11 01:58 PM |
#9 |
-
I'm not sticking up for the site, consume info with caution, always nt |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 02:38 PM |
#14 |
-
Bogus sites are best simply avoided. That's what I do with them. |
MineralMan |
Mar-24-11 02:47 PM |
#15 |
-
Chernoble was detecable in CA in 10 days. |
Bluenorthwest |
Mar-24-11 06:10 PM |
#20 |
-
This disaster is only just starting, ships 250 miles from Japan getting radiation |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 08:18 PM |
#22 |
-
To you Chernobyl statement: difference is the EXPLOSION that sent material worldwide |
flamingdem |
Mar-24-11 08:40 PM |
#24 |