You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #89: Update - Anyone see this? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
89. Update - Anyone see this?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

May 5, 2010, 6:39 p.m. EDT

FCC to move to preserve Net neutrality

By John Letzing, MarketWatch

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski has opted to try to re-regulate the Internet in an effort to preserve so-called Net neutrality, a senior FCC official said Wednesday.

The commission will now seek to regulate Internet lines by selectively using rules originally written for traditional phone networks, in order to prevent service providers from hindering traffic and blocking access to certain Web sites.

The FCC official said Genachowski will outline a "third way," which would apply only a "small handful" of rules under Title II of the Communications Act to the Internet. This is intended "to fulfill the previously stated agenda of extending broadband to all Americans, protecting consumers, ensuring fair competition and preserving a free and open Internet," the official added.

Genachowski is expected to make a related announcement Thursday.

---

More at link: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fcc-reportedly-to-move...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama FCC Expected to Abandon Net Neutrality, Universal Internet scentopine  May-03-10 06:36 PM   #0 
  - This is important stuff. Many thanks.  That Is Quite Enough   May-03-10 06:38 PM   #1 
  - Gee, Obama going back on one of his pledges? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!  scarletwoman   May-03-10 06:39 PM   #2 
  - You, me and Capt Renault  BrklynLiberal   May-03-10 06:43 PM   #4 
  - Still . . . . shameful!!  defendandprotect   May-04-10 12:42 PM   #37 
  - lol. Exactly. I wonder what the payoff on this was. I'll bet it's  icee   May-04-10 11:11 AM   #31 
  - Yeah  irislake   May-04-10 01:29 PM   #41 
  - And I am sick and tired of it.  Enthusiast   May-04-10 01:54 PM   #43 
  - Is there anything he won't back down on?  dflprincess   May-04-10 02:59 PM   #56 
  - He has no core values. He has no deeply held principles.  scarletwoman   May-04-10 04:19 PM   #63 
  - Sometimes I wonder if he has a bit of Chauncy Gardiner in him.  amandabeech   May-04-10 06:35 PM   #74 
  - No. n/t  QC   May-04-10 11:25 PM   #79 
  - It's becoming a habit for Obama to go back on  sabrina 1   May-04-10 03:39 PM   #60 
  - Make internet a public utility - take it from our corporate terrorist enemies nt  msongs   May-03-10 06:42 PM   #3 
  - good idea  HillbillyBob   May-03-10 06:50 PM   #8 
  - what are you, some kind of socialist or something?  tomp   May-04-10 01:05 AM   #22 
  - +1 ----  defendandprotect   May-04-10 12:43 PM   #38 
  - yes, it should be a public utility  katty   May-04-10 03:06 PM   #57 
  - LOL And off again. Time and time again.  RandomThoughts   May-03-10 06:47 PM   #5 
  - Done  HillbillyBob   May-03-10 06:48 PM   #6 
  - There is inherent confict of interest - AT&T is central to supplying  scentopine   May-03-10 07:03 PM   #10 
     - I most certainly know first hand our emails etc are being interceped  HillbillyBob   May-03-10 09:02 PM   #20 
        - How do you know that firsthand?  CoffeeCat   May-04-10 01:09 PM   #39 
  - Done. But obviously a wasted effort. The fix is already in.  katandmoon   May-03-10 06:49 PM   #7 
  - Gee maybe we need to build out  HillbillyBob   May-03-10 06:52 PM   #9 
  - something has to be done  glinda   May-03-10 07:04 PM   #11 
  - But ya still gotta have access via cable, telephone or wireless hardware.  progressoid   May-04-10 10:53 AM   #28 
  - L.A. Free-Net - But they still use AT&T's resources so....  cui bono   May-04-10 12:08 PM   #33 
  - I figure you're right.  Enthusiast   May-04-10 01:56 PM   #44 
  - But if I go out and buy a micro transmitter with just a few watts of power  Iwasthere   May-03-10 07:07 PM   #12 
  - Mmm. that is a very good point.  truedelphi   May-04-10 04:44 PM   #68 
  - Im not surprised  DJ13   May-03-10 07:13 PM   #13 
  - WHO threatened Obama  pangaia   May-03-10 07:20 PM   #14 
  - No one. He's with them, not us. nt  Lorien   May-04-10 02:30 PM   #52 
  - oh, why bother? none of them care, and Obama in particular  ima_sinnic   May-03-10 07:54 PM   #15 
  - ima-sinnic  Michigan-Arizona   May-03-10 08:01 PM   #16 
  - well, I really shouldn't say stuff like that, and I actually feel bad about it  ima_sinnic   May-03-10 08:34 PM   #17 
     - No, it needs to be said. Especially on this board.  cui bono   May-04-10 12:16 PM   #35 
     - I was old and optimistic  Doctor_J   May-05-10 07:24 PM   #88 
  - Yep. n/t  pleah   May-04-10 01:20 PM   #40 
  - Do you know why Julius got his FCC job?  mikesm   May-03-10 08:38 PM   #18 
  - what else is new for this administration? it always boils down to some insider money maker  ima_sinnic   May-03-10 08:59 PM   #19 
     - Hubby & I have just about given up.  Michigan-Arizona   May-03-10 09:28 PM   #21 
     - Work for real change instead  dreamnightwind   May-04-10 01:25 AM   #23 
     - Thank you!  proudohioan   May-04-10 10:09 AM   #26 
     - Maybe we have to lose a few elections before there's change  Ratty   May-04-10 12:10 PM   #34 
     - I plan on supporting third party candidates where possible  alarimer   May-04-10 04:27 PM   #65 
     - There are people who would stand up to the corporatists but...  mikesm   May-04-10 02:06 PM   #48 
  - I would advise that people connect with their friends on Facebook and Twitter to get this out there  Stand and Fight   May-04-10 03:21 AM   #24 
  - It was a bad sign when they appointed a FUNDRAISER to be chairman!  mikesm   May-04-10 04:41 PM   #67 
  - Another day, another craven sell-out to the crooks who run everything.  freddie mertz   May-04-10 08:18 AM   #25 
  - +1  Enthusiast   May-04-10 02:01 PM   #46 
  - He can sure the fuck lose my support over this.  cliffordu   May-04-10 10:49 AM   #27 
  - We will fight a little. But they will win.  progressoid   May-04-10 10:55 AM   #29 
  - Yeah because They control who gets to see the fight we put up.  cui bono   May-04-10 12:22 PM   #36 
     - It's all total bullshit.  Enthusiast   May-04-10 02:04 PM   #47 
  - This is a direct result from the coup of 2000  Uncle Joe   May-04-10 10:56 AM   #30 
  - Yeah, net neutrality  Enthusiast   May-04-10 02:08 PM   #49 
  - The disappointments don't stop do they n/t  GOTV   May-04-10 12:03 PM   #32 
  - Julius' Leglislative affairs guy is now leaving... (over this issue?)  mikesm   May-04-10 01:46 PM   #42 
  - Obama giving in will have more negative effect than when Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act  GreenTea   May-04-10 01:57 PM   #45 
  - Perfect, GreenTea.  Enthusiast   May-04-10 02:15 PM   #50 
  - Thanks for this reply - you are not over stating the case here, it is another brick in the wall -nt  scentopine   May-04-10 08:44 PM   #78 
  - kick to expose the latest sell-out  ima_sinnic   May-04-10 02:23 PM   #51 
  - The Hits Just Keep Coming  merkins   May-04-10 02:37 PM   #53 
  - I figured they already did this. Saddened but unsurprised. /nt  dorkulon   May-04-10 02:43 PM   #54 
  - My Internet Experience is More like Cable already - It's too late.  Grinchie   May-04-10 02:51 PM   #55 
  - We're suppose to have a President that we could expect to side with us  INdemo   May-04-10 03:08 PM   #58 
  - If we lose the Internet...  KansDem   May-04-10 03:31 PM   #59 
  - I don't think writing to the WH or Congress does any good.  sabrina 1   May-04-10 04:03 PM   #61 
  - I agree - he holds the left in a false equivalence with the right, it is infuriating...  scentopine   May-04-10 08:21 PM   #77 
     - I agree with everything you said.  sabrina 1   May-05-10 12:09 AM   #81 
  - We Need a President, not an Appeaser to Corporations  fascisthunter   May-04-10 04:12 PM   #62 
  - +1  slay   May-04-10 04:38 PM   #66 
     - Its Too Late  RuthlessPigg   May-04-10 05:12 PM   #69 
        - I don't disagree  slay   May-04-10 05:34 PM   #71 
  - Yet another example of Obama going back on a campaign promise.  alarimer   May-04-10 04:24 PM   #64 
  - "President Obama's repeated pledge" - Doesn't mean a thing. Obama's  davidwparker   May-04-10 05:32 PM   #70 
  - She's. The. Same.  YOY   May-04-10 06:50 PM   #76 
  - Hillary is as corporatist as Obama.  Enthusiast   May-05-10 02:43 AM   #82 
  - Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr  pmorlan1   May-04-10 05:43 PM   #72 
  - Goodbye USA !  Shining Jack   May-04-10 06:26 PM   #73 
  - Where's captain shit sandwitch to defend this?  YOY   May-04-10 06:38 PM   #75 
  - Probably hiding in the secret clubhouse. n/t  QC   May-04-10 11:27 PM   #80 
     - Formulating the most "know it all" approach thing to say and self-debating when to use the roll-eyes  YOY   May-05-10 08:36 AM   #85 
        - Well, that and giggling over bathing beauty pinups. n/t  QC   May-05-10 08:42 AM   #86 
  - kick as I wait for the corpo-defenders to come out from under their rocks  ima_sinnic   May-05-10 07:07 AM   #83 
  - Have you Signed the Net Neutrality Petitions yet?  NorthCarolina   May-05-10 08:02 AM   #84 
  - Important teleconference on nuetrality today  mikesm   May-05-10 10:34 AM   #87 
  - Update - Anyone see this?  BumRushDaShow   May-05-10 07:45 PM   #89 
     - Yes - the Wash. Po, article is accurate here is more analysis  scentopine   May-05-10 08:20 PM   #90 
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC