You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #8: I hope you're wrong, too, but you're not. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I hope you're wrong, too, but you're not.
Edited on Sun Jan-31-10 11:24 AM by tom_paine
In fact, Don Poppy Bush Corleone and Sonny Jeb "coincidentally" visited the WH for a "private social call" which Don Poppy later called "a good meeting".

After all the 1970s Soviet-style stuff that has occurred in this nation for the last 10, really 40, years is it REALLY a stretch to consider that The Don of Americcca's visit was to remind Obama of his place, not to make too good a show for the Plebs and not to get confused with what he was there for and start thinking he REALLY WAS there to clean up corruption and make systemic change.

Is it too much of a stretch to think that maybe Don Poppy is there with with Sonny Jeb in tow, so Sonny Jeb learns how the REAL governance of the Empire works and how to properly handle the "opposition", especially when they get to forgetting why they are there, and thinking their job in BushMerica REALLY IS opposition?

As I have said before, people who watch and believe the ever-more-nonsensical Propaganda Show put on by the RW Lie Machine and the "me-too" Corporate M$M are forever puzzled, which is why Kremlinology is the only way to analyze the Bush Empire and it's machinations properly.

As in "sure Bin Laden is worried about Global Warming and SURE he, a fundamentalist Wahhabist, is quoting Liberal Jews like Choamsky in the tapes."

My God, how much more laughably obvious and nonsensicaldoes it have to get before anything more than the tiniest 0.05% of us start asking common sense questions and understanding that what comes out of our Corporate-State-Controlled-Media is as unreliable as anything that came out of the 1970s Soviet Union?

Apparently, the answer is "much much MUCH more transparnently and laughably obvious".

I hope you're wrong, too, but you're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC