You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: I saw the article in Science yesterday... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I saw the article in Science yesterday...
first I had heard of this. But, just from paying atttention to what is going on in bio, its clear that the old "Modern Synthesis" needs an update. In the last ten years, we have had:

1) proof that Horizontal (between species) Gene Transfer (Nobel Prize to Barbara McClintock) is very important.

2) We have discovered that the so-called "junk DNA" in introns is really coding for RNA interference molecules that regulate gene transcription.

3) We have decoded the "histone code", which shows that information is passed between generations by "epigenetic" means.

4) We have counted the number of genes and realized that obscure stuff like "alternative splicing" of exons destroys the "one gene, one protein" dogma of the Modern Synthtesis.

BOTTOM LINE: there are a huge number of Nobel-prize-winning reasons to revisit the Modern Synthesis. This is not just New Age crapola.

----

As for Stuart Kaufmann, he is a complex case. He was instrumental in founding SFI and bringing complexity theory to the forefront. He and Brian Goodwin brought D'Arcy Thomson's work on morphology back from the dead. He is the real deal. That said, he is a windy, vague, speaker. Its easy to blow him off because he is a space cadet. But, he did some good work.

----

I, personally, find this whole cult-like take on 16 people as typical of media feeding frenzies. I doubt these folks are the only ones who think this way. I doubt that there thinking is completely disjoint from mainstream thinking. But, the fucking media always has to turn everything into a confrontation.

This is just science happening. This is just Thomas Kuhn's "paradigm shift" playing itself out in real time.

I am watching this with some interest, as a scientist. This whole argument about the "Darwin industry" seems to me to be overblown. It is for people who want controversy instead of progress. Maybe if I had had to get a grant for A16-style work, and I kept getting shot down by entrenched Modern Synthesis folks, I would buy into this "confrontation" scenario; but I haven't', and I don't.

Thanks for an interesting post.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC