You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: The problem is that they want "Proof" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. The problem is that they want "Proof"
This is not directed at you, phantom power, but I thought it needed to be posted based on some comments in this thread.

Anyone with half a background in science knows that proof for a scienctific theorem is ridiculous. You do not prove theories using the scientific method, you test them by trying to disprove them. Science is constantly evolving and should always be open to new ideas. The reason is obvious in the science forum (LINK).

There are always alternative theories, no matter how outlandish, to any theory. We simply test each hypothesis and accept the one that cannot be disproven and best explains the phenomenon. With further testing, the hypothesis is refined and recieves greater acceptance by the scientific community. It then becomes a theory.

The "skeptics" use a lack of knowledge about the scientific method to create doubt by demanding proof of the greenhouse gas theory of global warming. They then throw out sun spots, cosmic radiation, and other wild theories to try and weaken public acceptance this theory. Everyone of these alternatives have been tested and disproven as the cause for the current warming trend but they use them to sow doubt. The general public doesn't realize the volume of research that supports this theorem not how the scientific method works so it is partially effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Global Warming debate is over. Harper_is_Bush  Jun-01-06 07:34 AM   #0 
  - Uh, there's a lot of people who still believe .. .  donco6   Jun-01-06 07:36 AM   #1 
  - ... and that the moon landing was staged in a studio  DesertRat   Jun-04-06 05:34 PM   #25 
  - You cannot shut up paid skeptics with evidence.  endarkenment   Jun-01-06 07:53 AM   #2 
  - We the People SHould Sue Them  stepnw1f   Jun-01-06 08:02 AM   #3 
     - There is no case there.  endarkenment   Jun-01-06 08:06 AM   #4 
  - Studies Portray Tropical Arctic in Distant Past  JHH   Jun-01-06 08:10 AM   #5 
  - Strawman: "just CO2 emissions from oil".  endarkenment   Jun-01-06 08:17 AM   #6 
  - Thinking that the debate is over is the rhetorical dodge  JHH   Jun-01-06 08:32 AM   #7 
  - The debate is over in the sense that the debate over evolution  endarkenment   Jun-01-06 08:58 AM   #9 
  - I only used information from the New York Times  JHH   Jun-01-06 10:47 AM   #14 
     - First of all we know that the CO2 is anthropogenic.  seasat   Jun-03-06 12:49 PM   #19 
  - It is time to start planning  ktlyon   Jun-03-06 01:26 PM   #20 
  - NO ONE is saying that it's just due to human activity  DesertRat   Jun-04-06 05:32 PM   #24 
  - What else is there to climate change than human activity?  Harper_is_Bush   Jun-05-06 07:41 AM   #27 
  - CO2 ?  jdlh8894   Jun-01-06 08:54 AM   #8 
     - Yeah well it is not like the poster actually has an argument. nt.  endarkenment   Jun-01-06 09:01 AM   #10 
     - CO2. n/t  igil   Jun-01-06 10:15 AM   #11 
     - Yes the very same CO2  JHH   Jun-01-06 01:14 PM   #15 
        - What do you think is causing global warming?  Harper_is_Bush   Jun-05-06 01:06 PM   #28 
  - You just "feel" that do you? Well, isn't that special.  Harper_is_Bush   Jun-01-06 10:28 PM   #16 
  - We the people should revoke their corporate charters and take over...  wizdum   Jun-01-06 10:15 AM   #12 
  - Which skeptics?  igil   Jun-01-06 10:24 AM   #13 
  - Good question.  Harper_is_Bush   Jun-06-06 06:46 PM   #31 
  - There has been "enough" data for years. The skeptics....  phantom power   Jun-01-06 11:12 PM   #17 
  - There has been consensus for years, but these ice cores dating  Harper_is_Bush   Jun-03-06 11:27 AM   #18 
  - The problem is that they want "Proof"  seasat   Jun-03-06 07:36 PM   #22 
     - Hopefully Gores movie will counter that. n/t  Harper_is_Bush   Jun-06-06 12:20 PM   #30 
  - ttt !!  Blue_Tires   Jun-03-06 04:54 PM   #21 
  - Everyone should see An Inconvenient Truth  DesertRat   Jun-04-06 01:41 PM   #23 
  - Check the OP link, they added a "LIAR ALERT" on one of the google ads!  Harper_is_Bush   Jun-04-06 08:29 PM   #26 
  - yeah, we "debated" so long that global warming won. n/t  silvershadow   Jun-06-06 12:16 AM   #29 
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC