You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Boy, that's for sure. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Boy, that's for sure.
Edited on Tue Mar-22-05 02:40 AM by Boo Boo
He's the man in Iraq, no doubt. But, IMO, it's kind of a gimme. It's not hard to look smart when you're going up against Bush, Rummy, Wolfowitz, Feith, etc. After all, Gen. Franks called Feith the "dumbest fucking man on the planet."

Sistani's got the best hand at the poker table, and he knows it. He doesn't really have to do much. His biggest problem, though, is that we've really got ourselves into a position where we can't (or don't want to) tolerate Iran's current government.

I was sorta taken aback when I heard that Sistani wasn't even an Iraqi citizen. He's Iranian. Is he independent? Or will he side with Iran when/if the Neocons pull something on Iran. If Israel bombs Iran as a preamble to a US/Iran war, what is Sistani going to do?

What, me worry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Thomas Friedman (The New York Times): A Nobel for Sistani Jack Rabbit  Mar-20-05 06:22 PM   #0 
  - This guy makes sense about once a year. This may be his moment.  autorank   Mar-20-05 06:27 PM   #1 
  - Nah. He's not making sense.  Boo Boo   Mar-21-05 11:06 AM   #10 
     - I was being ironic. I agree with everything you said.  autorank   Mar-21-05 11:43 PM   #11 
        - Boy, that's for sure.  Boo Boo   Mar-22-05 02:39 AM   #13 
  - I'm sure the 1500 dead Americans would say it was all worth it  chaumont58   Mar-20-05 06:41 PM   #2 
  - I agree that Bush deserves no Nobel Prize  Jack Rabbit   Mar-20-05 06:56 PM   #3 
     - I think you are so right about the international criminal court  chaumont58   Mar-20-05 09:35 PM   #4 
        - More likely is the scenario I outlined in post 6  Jack Rabbit   Mar-21-05 08:22 AM   #7 
  - Al Sistani's role has been interesting.  bemildred   Mar-20-05 10:25 PM   #5 
  - You're right that Friedman has been overoptimistic every step of the way  Jack Rabbit   Mar-21-05 08:20 AM   #6 
     - I have read a couple pieces that suggest things are not ducky up North.  bemildred   Mar-21-05 08:32 AM   #8 
        - You might want to read Gary Younge's piece for the Guardian  Jack Rabbit   Mar-21-05 09:33 AM   #9 
  - Although I despise Friedman on most accounts I must agree  minkyboodle   Mar-22-05 01:30 AM   #12 
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC