Reply #109: I don't agree Kerry should attack Bush personally either. When I say

[Only Me]

we need not play 'nice' I don't mean attack 'him'as a human being. I mean attack his presidency and his failures. There is alot more than just Iraq to talk about. The dirtier aspects should be done by the party it self. When I say dirty, I don't even really mean dirty. I mean the "TRUTH" because in bush's case it has been better than a novel. He has done and said so much, it should have MADE our campaign. But we didn't keep the fire burning in the media.
The only place these things really get talked about are places like this. We already know how we will vote, it's the other half of America we needed to grasp a hold of. The way I see it, the media
needs news , Rove set the trap and we feel in. Kerry became the news. BUT...it could just have easily been 'bush and the Saudi House,' 'Iraq and the Media Block', or the Painted picture of 'Unstable President'...Payed but "AWOL" .. Bush and the Year he worked for "Bin Ladin Family" You get the general ideal.
I don't think it really has alot to do with Kerry voting for war in Iraq anymore..that's kind of old news. This siftboat issue could be old news too if we had more time...or...a bigger scandle hit the Bush team and stayed out there in front for a few more weeks.