Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-09-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
are a bunch of tin-foil hat garbage. I've seen links on the "Coming American Holocaust" before. Utter illogical trash.
Re bomb:
The only way uranium is dangerous in an explosive is if you have a critical mass of it wrapped in precision high explosives with a Polonium pit...IE atomic bomb. It would actually be good if a bomb was half uranium and half TNT-would do much less damage than one that was all TNT.
|
| -Scientists Say Dirty Bomb Would Be a Dud (Padilla) |
UpInArms |
Jun-09-04 04:13 PM |
#0 |
-
In general |
shoelace414 |
Jun-09-04 04:19 PM |
#1 |
 -
other great quotes from this article |
UpInArms |
Jun-09-04 04:31 PM |
#3 |
 -
Most of the damage is already done... |
Thor_MN |
Jun-09-04 10:21 PM |
#21 |
-
What morons! |
struggle4progress |
Jun-09-04 04:29 PM |
#2 |
-
Two years solitary confinement for a bad idea. |
aquart |
Jun-09-04 04:32 PM |
#4 |
-
Then why are we so concerned with the depleted uranium in spent rounds? |
MercutioATC |
Jun-09-04 04:50 PM |
#5 |
 -
It's the time exposed to it that's poisonous |
Canuckistanian |
Jun-09-04 05:06 PM |
#6 |
  -
pulverization is also a factor |
MisterP |
Jun-09-04 05:41 PM |
#8 |
 -
Yes, that's true. Americium and Cadmium are much worse,though |
Canuckistanian |
Jun-09-04 06:05 PM |
#11 |
 -
as i recall, americium is used in smoke detectors in minute quantities. |
truthisfreedom |
Jun-09-04 06:10 PM |
#12 |
 -
DU is primarily a toxicological hazard, not a radioactive hazard |
NickB79 |
Jun-09-04 05:38 PM |
#7 |
  -
Exactly. Basically Lead poisioning. The radioactivity is insignificant. |
HalfManHalfBiscuit |
Jun-09-04 05:47 PM |
#9 |
  -
So, in particulate form, uranium IS hazardous? |
MercutioATC |
Jun-09-04 08:52 PM |
#16 |
 -
I'm sure there could be some health effects |
NickB79 |
Jun-09-04 09:59 PM |
#20 |
 -
Imagine the consequences of evacuating a major population center. |
MercutioATC |
Jun-09-04 11:17 PM |
#22 |
 -
if it gets INSIDE you... |
Voice_of_Europe |
Jun-10-04 07:36 AM |
#27 |
  -
Yup, Inhalation = guranteed lung cancer |
Xithras |
Jun-10-04 02:04 PM |
#38 |
 -
I'm concerned because it's a toxic heavy metal. |
struggle4progress |
Jun-10-04 01:06 PM |
#31 |
-
I meant why be concerned about that and not a dirty bomb? |
MercutioATC |
Jun-10-04 01:29 PM |
#33 |
-
It would of course be possible to make a very nasty "dirty bomb." |
struggle4progress |
Jun-10-04 01:37 PM |
#36 |
-
Doesn't matter. |
FlashHarry |
Jun-09-04 06:03 PM |
#10 |
 -
I believe this goes more the the exaggeration by US officials,... |
Just Me |
Jun-10-04 01:17 PM |
#32 |
-
The alleged design would HAVE to be a dud If the BFEE or gov't framed |
Vitruvius |
Jun-09-04 07:30 PM |
#13 |
 -
The real reason |
Carolab |
Jun-09-04 08:41 PM |
#14 |
-
Detention Camps |
Zynx |
Jun-09-04 08:44 PM |
#15 |
-
What about this? |
Carolab |
Jun-09-04 09:25 PM |
#17 |
-
Wanting to be able to do that to people... |
Zynx |
Jun-09-04 09:44 PM |
#19 |
-
And yet there it is |
Carolab |
Jun-10-04 01:37 AM |
#23 |
-
Absolutely ridiculous... |
Invalence1 |
Jun-10-04 03:18 AM |
#24 |
-
You have any concept of logistics? |
Zynx |
Jun-10-04 01:30 PM |
#34 |
-
Excuse me, but |
Carolab |
Jun-10-04 01:53 PM |
#37 |
-
Here's the indictment |
Snazzy |
Jun-09-04 09:34 PM |
#18 |
 -
Your BS detector is correct. A gas explosion in an ap't would NOT |
Vitruvius |
Jun-10-04 05:30 AM |
#25 |
-
The biggest problem would be psychological. |
Nile |
Jun-10-04 06:23 AM |
#26 |
-
I remember when they put uranium in chemistry sets for kids |
Snellius |
Jun-10-04 11:22 AM |
#28 |
 -
if we're going for a trip down memory lane, i remember when |
treepig |
Jun-10-04 11:33 AM |
#29 |
-
kick |
struggle4progress |
Jun-10-04 01:05 PM |
#30 |
-
Years from now historians will lament the hysteria caused by |
The_Casual_Observer |
Jun-10-04 01:34 PM |
#35 |
-
kick |
struggle4progress |
Jun-11-04 12:40 AM |
#39 |