You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #68: Would be Inert [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #44
68. Would be Inert
It should be inert after 5 years, that means either it was just a big threat or that something doesn't add up.

All I see is lots of talk happening on this subject, yet no real details on it, no significant evidence of real WMDs.

To be totally honest, this was even within my parameters of predicted ploys by the Administration as I set down over a year ago, this will be used as proof of WMDs and if this isn't enough they'll find someone huge about a month before the election. Timing with this country and the confusion over it makes this an event of questionable authenticity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC