You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: What are you so angry about? You're winning. Aside from that it makes you sound like a right-winger. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Bogart Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. What are you so angry about? You're winning. Aside from that it makes you sound like a right-winger.
Edited on Sat Dec-10-11 11:44 PM by Bogart
Then again, there are a lot of people from both sides of the spectrum who are unemployed and they are angry about it.

The left and the right also agree on something at the moment--the American economy is in bad shape. Thus, in the view of the unemployed, and working people in general, it doesn't make sense that some in the government are actually trying to make things worse. By EPA's own 2011 estimates, their new regulations will cost industry $37 billion, 6.3 million paperwork burden hours, and 60,100 jobs.

Now, the EPA is going after farmers and ranchers--threatening to fine them for moving cattle, tilling a field or even driving down a dirt road, if they stir up to much dust.

With 9% unemployment and 2% economic growth, is this level of regulation appropriate today?

You are not just hurting the right, my friend. If you recall, labor unions were for the pipeline that was recently regulated out of reality. But right-wingers need jobs too. Perhaps if they were employed, they wouldn't be so angry all the time.

Here is what another one of "your right-wingers" has to say about it.

We need to avoid the regulatory uncertainty that has slowed investment and job creation over the last three years. Measures that threaten the balance of supply and demand, and the cost, of our electricity do just that. The administration should take these significant concerns into consideration before going forward with the rule by the end of the year. EPA should ensure that, at minimum, the rule is revised to provide adequate time for cost-effective compliance in ways that do not threaten the reliability of electricity. - Evan Bayh D, former U.S. Senator from Indiana





Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Offshoring comes under bipartisan attack in Congress Newsjock  Dec-09-11 11:24 PM   #0 
  - a start. but can we up the outrage a bit higher on the salary scale, as well, congress people? n/t  marasinghe   Dec-09-11 11:45 PM   #1 
  - I think they SHOULD NOT get Federal loans or grants-they do now? Negative  StarsInHerHair   Dec-10-11 12:11 AM   #2 
  - This is a bit too late.  JDPriestly   Dec-10-11 01:40 AM   #3 
  - yup  Skittles   Dec-10-11 08:44 AM   #10 
  - A lot late  harun   Dec-10-11 04:45 PM   #22 
  - what about manufacturing  KT2000   Dec-10-11 02:00 AM   #4 
  - I'm not sure but that they should get a credit if they DO move them offshore.  jtuck004   Dec-10-11 04:07 AM   #5 
  - And what about the millions of manufacturing jobs? This is just more theatre. Instead we should be  Citizen Worker   Dec-10-11 05:23 AM   #6 
  - Perhaps these "Four U.S. lawmakers" should refrain from making laws that force businesses to choose  Bogart   Dec-10-11 07:00 AM   #7 
  - and just exactly what laws would those be? Labor laws? Health and Safety? Environmental laws?  bread_and_roses   Dec-10-11 07:21 AM   #8 
     - One of many examples (this fight to save jobs is also bipartisan)  Bogart   Dec-10-11 08:25 AM   #9 
        - sorry, this is RW nonsense  bread_and_roses   Dec-10-11 09:19 AM   #12 
           - "...regulations are too weak, too friendly to polluters and exploiters, inadequately enforced,..."  Bogart   Dec-10-11 09:32 AM   #14 
              - Oh bullshit.  JoeyT   Dec-10-11 10:05 AM   #15 
              - EPA Regs DO have that effect  joeglow3   Dec-10-11 10:21 AM   #16 
              - Companies will do whatever increases their profits, even if it kills us.  No Elephants   Dec-11-11 12:03 AM   #27 
              - What are you so angry about? You're winning. Aside from that it makes you sound like a right-winger.  Bogart   Dec-10-11 11:37 PM   #23 
                 - The poster of Reply 15 did not sound like a right winger at all to me!  No Elephants   Dec-11-11 12:15 AM   #28 
              - Then maybe the government should offer DIRECT support  socialist_n_TN   Dec-10-11 10:44 AM   #17 
              - It case you haven't noticed, the government doesn't have any money...  Bogart   Dec-10-11 11:41 PM   #24 
              - LOL!  No Elephants   Dec-10-11 11:55 PM   #25 
  - Walgreens is outsourcing its billing (and some accounting) effective Jan 1  underpants   Dec-10-11 09:01 AM   #11 
  - Too little, too late. And long overdue. eom  tawadi   Dec-10-11 09:28 AM   #13 
  - Now there's a bill that's deader than fried chicken upon arrival.  Gman   Dec-10-11 01:23 PM   #18 
  - Toyota is the most popular nameplate in America; what's so special about call center jobs?  Romulox   Dec-10-11 03:59 PM   #19 
  - All jobs are special. But some foreign companies make stuff here. Trick is to find  No Elephants   Dec-11-11 12:01 AM   #26 
  - Good. Hurry up. (nt)  w4rma   Dec-10-11 04:04 PM   #20 
  - This is good. But I hoped this article was going to be about offshore financial/tax havens...  Dover   Dec-10-11 04:07 PM   #21 
  - gawd forbid we should step on Rich Mitt's toes  wordpix   Dec-12-11 09:33 PM   #31 
  - Why the focus on call centers?  DCBob   Dec-12-11 11:23 AM   #29 
  - but it's OK for Rich Mitt to offshore investments so his clients can access tax havens?  wordpix   Dec-12-11 09:32 PM   #30 
  - weak start -- how about requiring all US military equipment be made in the US?  0rganism   Dec-12-11 09:53 PM   #32 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC