You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: Same udder, different teat. n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Same udder, different teat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Bill seeks to require drug screening for jobless benefits Newsjock  Dec-09-11 03:35 PM   #0 
  - Sigh... same old shit, different day. WTF is wrong w/these Pubs? I think they are mentally ill.  CurtEastPoint   Dec-09-11 03:38 PM   #1 
  - You "think"? There is no guesswork to it. They are fucking NUTS.  RBInMaine   Dec-09-11 07:58 PM   #23 
  - And who's paying for the thousands of drug screenings? Oh yeah, taxpayers.  NickB79   Dec-09-11 03:46 PM   #2 
  - All so their drug screening cronies can make more $$$ n/t  iscooterliberally   Dec-09-11 03:52 PM   #3 
  - The Pathology Institute of Middle Georgia  DissedByBush   Dec-09-11 10:26 PM   #26 
  - Make no mistake this hippie-punching pure and simple  MindPilot   Dec-09-11 04:02 PM   #4 
  - wasn't this found unconstitutional in WI years ago? FL is trying it under pRick Scott  Roland99   Dec-09-11 04:21 PM   #5 
  - Colbert's sidekick tried to pass Scott a piss cup at one of  russspeakeasy   Dec-09-11 04:27 PM   #7 
  - "...ensuring job seekers are at their competitive best"  KansDem   Dec-09-11 04:22 PM   #6 
  - It's an IQ Test  Blacksheep214   Dec-09-11 04:28 PM   #8 
  - You'd better watch it, some labs can distinguish synthetic urine from the real thing.  Leftist Agitator   Dec-09-11 05:22 PM   #12 
     - Sucks, don't it?  Blacksheep214   Dec-09-11 06:45 PM   #19 
  - Even Repubs get high.  DocMac   Dec-09-11 04:33 PM   #9 
  - in Kingston's defense, he is an ignorant fool, and possibly a moron.  provis99   Dec-09-11 05:17 PM   #10 
  - Yeah - the unemployed were FIRED because of drug use - and then they got UI benefits - to do more  jpak   Dec-09-11 05:21 PM   #11 
  - looking to screen lazy from lazy with a reason  Demonaut   Dec-09-11 05:37 PM   #13 
  - How about drug testing congress first?  Shoe Horn   Dec-09-11 05:49 PM   #14 
  - This could be a windfall for LabCorp  WhatsNext   Dec-09-11 06:01 PM   #15 
  - Didn't Orrin Hatch start this meme?  WhatsNext   Dec-09-11 06:04 PM   #16 
  - Let's go all out then.  bluedigger   Dec-09-11 06:13 PM   #17 
  - when they test congressmen for Satanism, by throwing them into the Potomac every Xmas,  marasinghe   Dec-09-11 06:32 PM   #18 
  - I'm just thinking of persons in Aerospace or Airlines, over the years that have lost their jobs...  SoapBox   Dec-09-11 07:03 PM   #20 
  - Attention, Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert  Missy Vixen   Dec-09-11 07:16 PM   #21 
  - Same udder, different teat. n/t  A Simple Game   Dec-09-11 07:52 PM   #22 
  - This already happened in FL did it not?  Stevepol   Dec-09-11 09:20 PM   #24 
  - Yup, nothing more than a waste of time and money n/t  geomon666   Dec-10-11 11:52 AM   #29 
  - Swell. So medical marijuana patients like me should either starve or go blind.  Zhade   Dec-09-11 09:28 PM   #25 
  - Hey Jack, you first!  Earth_First   Dec-09-11 10:50 PM   #27 
  - Because this worked so well in Florida  geomon666   Dec-10-11 11:51 AM   #28 
  - Drug screening should be required for all politicians at all levels of government.  sarcasmo   Dec-10-11 05:34 PM   #30 
  - republican swine is setting his sites  ElMuertoMonkey   Dec-12-11 05:36 PM   #31 
  - "Those identified as having a high probability of drug use" == ?  0rganism   Dec-12-11 10:00 PM   #32 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC