You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: Actually, the cop wasn't being a butthead. Hear me out--- [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-11 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. Actually, the cop wasn't being a butthead. Hear me out---
Edited on Sat Dec-03-11 06:09 AM by msanthrope
Under this screwed-up law, there is no provision for 'ticketing.' The cop was required, by law, to 'detain.'

But he didn't.

Technically, IDL is not a 'license.' It is a translation of the license issued by your home country. You need to carry both. I know, I've had one. So when the man showed up in court with his actual driver's license--the Japan one, charges were dropped.

This is a good case for the challenge of the law...the law is confusing, hard to implement, and is not tailored to be 'least restrictive' to the liberty of ordinary citizens and other people legally going about their business.****

The thing is, that cop KNEW the guy was ok. The cop also knew that he, technically, didn't have the proper documents under the poorly written law.

So the cop made a decision, and on the fly, decided to put the matter before a judge, WITHOUT arrest. He made a judgment call that he isn't allowed to do, under this very bad law.%%%%

This is very embarrassing to the individual. But, it also may help getting a horrible law overturned.


****Alabama cops got a 4-hour training course on this law. Immigration officials gets 8 weeks, minimum, of intensive training.

&&&&On edit, I've been thinking. One point to bring up in challenge to this law is that LEOs routinely have the discretion to ticket you, and have a judge sort it out, or give you time to comply when it comes to traffic enforcement, zoning, etc....so why don't cops have this discretion written into this law?

All this from a state too lazy to adopt E-Verify. Right--because then, EVERYONE would have to be checked out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC