You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #6: A redacted version of the defense filing can be obtained from the link here: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. A redacted version of the defense filing can be obtained from the link here:
28 November 2011
Defense Request for Production of Evidence
The Defense filed the following request for production of evidence on November 22, 2011 /

The link leads to google docs, and you will need a google account (and will need to sign into that account) to read the redacted filing

It's pretty dull imo: Coombs asks broadly for White House, Justice, State, and Defense materials relating to the case, including various damage assessments

Given the variety of damage assessments he requests, it may be somewhat incongruous that he also petitions for a ruling that the government not be allowed to argue damage inconsistent with the assessments -- since it's likely the multiple assessments are mutually inconsistent in various ways.This, however, is entirely secondary in any case, since the government obviously cannot take the position that soldiers, with access to restricted information, are entitled to release it, if the resulting damage would not be catastrophic
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -Bradley Manning lawyer: White House review found 'leak' did no real damage alp227  Nov-28-11 06:02 PM   #0 
  - That poor kid.  PETRUS   Nov-28-11 06:05 PM   #1 
  - So e can expect Bradley Manning to be released and offered some recompense?  Vincardog   Nov-28-11 06:06 PM   #2 
  - No - he still broke the law  hack89   Nov-29-11 01:40 PM   #12 
     - OH? How do we know "He broke the law"?  Vincardog   Nov-29-11 03:09 PM   #13 
        - Ask me after the article 32 hearing  hack89   Nov-29-11 03:13 PM   #14 
           - if they proceed to trial. Would that be the trial that determines if he broke the law? Or have we  Vincardog   Nov-29-11 03:20 PM   #15 
              - OK - so lets wait until the trial.  hack89   Nov-29-11 03:21 PM   #16 
  - Don't Confuse The Govt. With Facts  Demeter   Nov-28-11 06:07 PM   #3 
  - There must be something to do with getting Julian Assange. None of this  midnight   Nov-28-11 06:19 PM   #4 
  - Having lived in other countries, the Wikileaks sounded like  JDPriestly   Nov-28-11 06:21 PM   #5 
  - A redacted version of the defense filing can be obtained from the link here:  struggle4progress   Nov-28-11 08:03 PM   #6 
  - Do you expect it's offered up to reduce any sentence?  Robb   Nov-28-11 08:23 PM   #7 
     - ianal either.but there can be no actual proceedings until after the mid-december hearing.  struggle4progress   Nov-28-11 09:39 PM   #9 
  - Treason!!!111!!! Shut him up in Leavenworth for the rest of his life!!1111!!!  riderinthestorm   Nov-28-11 08:25 PM   #8 
  - K&R  Solly Mack   Nov-29-11 06:49 AM   #10 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-29-11 01:37 PM   #11 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC