You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #63: There is video. The Hotel said a lot of things that turned out not [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. There is video. The Hotel said a lot of things that turned out not
to be true in the early stages also. The only thing WE do not yet know, although it's very likely DSK's attorneys and their investigative team DO, is who are the contacts in the Hotel who called Sarkozy's presidential residence to tell them of an arrest that HAD NOT YET HAPPENED, and who at the hotel told the French version of Andrew Breitbart about the same arrest that did not happen until hours later.

Initially it was the timeline that never made sense. The lies about DSK 'fleeing' and 'booking a flight' to quickly leave etc. etc. all of which conflicted with the facts and has now been corrected, by the Prosecutor's office. Although looking at the comments here you would think that Rupert Murdoch was the factual recorder of events, despite all evidence that obliterates the lies told in the tabloids.

Someone at the hotel knew a lot about an event that had not yet happened. But since DSK is suing Sarkozy's Political Party, they may be keeping that information to themselves, until they are in court.

I myself asked on Twitter the Andrew Breitbart clone who he was in contact with at the hotel, many people did actually, but he as expected, he did not respond. Now of course he will be put under oath and his phone records and the hotel's looked at.

There were glaring contradictions in this case from the very beginning which is what alerted people who actually care about facts, to withhold judgement until those questions were answered. The NYPD spokesperson, Browne, eg, conflicted in his statements with what was easily checked even then, but then, we are talking about the NYPD so that was no surprise.

Most of those questions very astute people were asking, have now been mostly answered. Except who at the hotel was the French connection. But I have a feeling that may already be known to the attorneys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC