You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #73: The Worst Big Bank on Wall Street? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
73. The Worst Big Bank on Wall Street?
Edited on Fri Nov-25-11 10:24 AM by mahatmakanejeeves
The Worst Big Bank on Wall Street?

By John Reeves

....
In his new book, Exile on Wall Street, {Mike Mayo, a bank analyst who has been covering Wall Street for more than 20 years,} argues that the big Wall Street banks are set up nowadays to take excessive risks, while providing outsized compensation for bankers. And despite numerous though lightly enforced regulations, the federal government is there to bail these institutions out when things go wrong.

Mayo believes that Citigroup, which he describes as the "poster child for the financial industry's problems," provides a perfect example of all that is wrong with our big banks right now. The two chapters that he devotes to Citi are very disturbing.

A dubious track record
Mayo shows us that over the past decade Citi has been "involved in virtually every major financial screw-up, from Enron to WorldCom, to the analyst scandals of the tech bubble, to the mortgage fiasco." And this has cost shareholders a lot of money. Mayo calculates that this dubious track record has resulted in "about $100 billion in pre-tax losses from fines, settlements, reserves, or writedowns from 2001 to 2010."

Perhaps more troubling is that Citi's entire history reveals a similar recklessness. Mayo notes that the company has "come close to failing six times in its history." And on many occasions it has required a federal bailout to remain in business. Sadly, a predictable pattern has emerged during the course of Citi's history. First, it takes excessive risks and then gets into trouble. At that point, the government has to "step in simply so it can survive." Ultimately, new regulations are created, which Citi "grumbles about and then doesn't follow anyway."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC