You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #11: I'm an employer who doesn't care so I don't test. But, if I ran a charter [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I'm an employer who doesn't care so I don't test. But, if I ran a charter
air service I would drug test everyone. There are some jobs that require drug testing. I wouldn't want to shop in a warehouse-style store that didn't drug test employees. I don't want something dropping on my head because a stoner stayed up all night getting baked and didn't pay full attention while lifting a pallet full of air compressors onto a high shelf.

My company manufactures guitar accessories. Most of my employees are artists and musicians. Drug tests are not going to fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Judge Orders Injunction On Floridas Welfare Drug Testing Law demmiblue  Oct-24-11 02:58 PM   #0 
  - What took so long  musiclawyer   Oct-24-11 03:01 PM   #1 
  - Finally. This is a disgusting abomination.  Liberal Veteran   Oct-24-11 03:01 PM   #2 
  - K&R Thanks ACLU for protecting the poor from suspicionless drug test.  midnight   Oct-24-11 03:03 PM   #3 
  - But getting a drug test to be employed is "suspicionless" as well, if it's a blanket requirement...  villager   Oct-24-11 03:08 PM   #4 
     - and that is just as fucking wrong too!  Kali   Oct-24-11 03:11 PM   #5 
     - And is that conducted by the government?  jberryhill   Oct-24-11 03:21 PM   #7 
     - Not for private employment -- though it's still suspicionless -- and we haven't touched on schools  villager   Oct-24-11 03:39 PM   #8 
        - Not much  jberryhill   Oct-24-11 04:28 PM   #10 
           - It is still "suspicionless," in that it's not occasioned by individual behavior  villager   Oct-24-11 08:31 PM   #12 
              - Ah "folks like me"  jberryhill   Oct-24-11 10:32 PM   #13 
                 - well, you're the one being snippy and snarky -- perhaps that's your definition of "civil?"  villager   Oct-24-11 11:33 PM   #15 
     - I'm an employer who doesn't care so I don't test. But, if I ran a charter  truthisfreedom   Oct-24-11 06:18 PM   #11 
        - ...and that gets to the heart of the distinction  jberryhill   Oct-24-11 10:35 PM   #14 
  - Oh, dear. Poor Governor Rick Voldemort is going to lose all of that potential  1monster   Oct-24-11 03:13 PM   #6 
  - Good. Nt  krabigirl   Oct-24-11 03:45 PM   #9 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC