You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #124: So Iraq was invaded with 100 troops in only an advisory role? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #116
124. So Iraq was invaded with 100 troops in only an advisory role?
Seriously the comparison is fucking stupid.

Yes the type of skepticism is understandable and all, but that doesn't excuse making knee-jerk reactions and screaming empty rhetoric in place of actual analysis. I'm willing to bet the majority of people screaming about "another war" didn't read anything in the article beyond the excerpt here, if even that (most of the posts seem as if they only read the title.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC