NOMOREDRUGWAR
(319 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-03-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #71 |
| 77. I'm glad my parents did mine |
|
I'm glad that it reduces my risk of contracting HIV by at least 50% without decreasing any sexual pleasure, and I am also glad that my sexual organ no longer resembles an ant-eater.
|
| -California prevents ban on male circumcision |
alp227 |
Oct-02-11 07:20 PM |
#0 |
-
Dickhead. |
Poll_Blind |
Oct-02-11 07:23 PM |
#1 |
-
Those who love cutting up baby's dicks can rejoice, for now. |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:24 PM |
#2 |
 -
You failed hard |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-02-11 07:29 PM |
#6 |
  -
High school is rough, but don't worry, you'll get through it. |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:32 PM |
#9 |
 -
You lost!!!! |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-02-11 07:41 PM |
#14 |
 -
You're right. |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:44 PM |
#16 |
 -
Besides, it clearly violates the establishment clause. |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-02-11 07:30 PM |
#8 |
  -
The government has been able to ban some religious practices, |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:52 PM |
#22 |
 -
You want religion out of government? How about gov out of religion. |
demosincebirth |
Oct-02-11 07:36 PM |
#11 |
  -
Yes and no. Consider the FLDS compound. Sometimes government |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:40 PM |
#13 |
 -
You just compared part of a religious ceremony practiced by Jews for thousands of years |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-02-11 07:42 PM |
#15 |
  -
If that argument is not PC enough for you, then consider Peyote. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:49 PM |
#19 |
   -
You have a problem with peyote use in ceremonies? |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-02-11 11:33 PM |
#49 |
  -
There are many who consider removing an infants foreskin "Child Molesting" |
AnotherDreamWeaver |
Oct-02-11 10:36 PM |
#44 |
   -
Mind your own business big |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-02-11 11:33 PM |
#50 |
  -
You should get together with the people in the Gungeon that oppose state pre-emption of local firear |
AtheistCrusader |
Oct-03-11 01:08 AM |
#54 |
 -
You're a male, |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-03-11 12:30 PM |
#62 |
  -
I already have an adopted son. |
AtheistCrusader |
Oct-03-11 12:50 PM |
#65 |
 -
That must burn you up inside right? |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-03-11 01:16 PM |
#69 |
 -
I would not have done it. |
AtheistCrusader |
Oct-03-11 02:02 PM |
#71 |
 -
I'm glad my parents did mine |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-03-11 03:47 PM |
#77 |
 -
Cite to evidence. |
AtheistCrusader |
Oct-03-11 05:35 PM |
#82 |
 -
Until then, |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-03-11 12:31 PM |
#63 |
 -
Boy, did you miss the mark. |
AtheistCrusader |
Oct-03-11 12:51 PM |
#66 |
 -
Oh, okay, but on your terms only. I see. nt |
demosincebirth |
Oct-02-11 07:51 PM |
#21 |
 -
Who else's terms should I use? Why shouldn't I advocate for my own opinions? nt |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:53 PM |
#23 |
 -
Government should stay out of this period. Brown was right to sign it. /nt |
still_one |
Oct-02-11 09:12 PM |
#35 |
-
Good, it violates the establishment clause, intrudes unnecessarily into families |
Warpy |
Oct-02-11 07:25 PM |
#3 |
 -
+1 |
demosincebirth |
Oct-02-11 07:30 PM |
#7 |
 -
Child mutilation is the state's business |
Cronus Protagonist |
Oct-03-11 05:12 AM |
#57 |
-
Your opinion isn't enforceable, sorry |
Warpy |
Oct-03-11 02:59 PM |
#74 |
-
Good. San Francisco JUST GOT PWNED by the California legislature |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-02-11 07:29 PM |
#4 |
 -
Why are you bashing San Francisco for what a group of whackjobs did? |
EFerrari |
Oct-02-11 11:36 PM |
#51 |
-
Probably because their BULLSHIT agenda on this issue |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-03-11 01:17 PM |
#70 |
-
What part of San Francisco didn't do this is unclear to you? |
EFerrari |
Oct-03-11 02:26 PM |
#72 |
-
Did San Francisco residents not put this on the ballot? |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-03-11 03:46 PM |
#76 |
-
So if some random nut in your town puts a petition together, I can blame you? |
EFerrari |
Oct-03-11 03:56 PM |
#78 |
-
It's not just one random nut |
NOMOREDRUGWAR |
Oct-03-11 04:10 PM |
#80 |
-
It was a random nut that put the petition together, not the city or the county. |
EFerrari |
Oct-03-11 04:14 PM |
#81 |
-
Because it is unconstitutional to infringe on religion. Duh. nt |
Bonobo |
Oct-02-11 07:29 PM |
#5 |
 -
Peyote, and faith-only healing for children, can be prosecuted. |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:37 PM |
#12 |
  -
Good point. I support those too. nt |
Bonobo |
Oct-02-11 07:48 PM |
#18 |
 -
Are you saying parents should be allowed to let their children die |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:50 PM |
#20 |
 -
Yes, you are misstating my position. nt |
Bonobo |
Oct-02-11 07:54 PM |
#24 |
 -
OK, what is your position? nt |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 07:55 PM |
#25 |
 -
You mean on the "Faith-Healing" thing? |
Bonobo |
Oct-02-11 08:01 PM |
#26 |
 -
I completely agree with that position, and that position infringes on religion. |
ZombieHorde |
Oct-02-11 08:07 PM |
#27 |
 -
I am glad we agree. So then we also agree that it is not black and white. nt |
Bonobo |
Oct-02-11 08:15 PM |
#28 |
 -
Yet, it's done all the time. |
AtheistCrusader |
Oct-03-11 01:09 AM |
#55 |
-
Good move, Governor Brown. |
Lasher |
Oct-02-11 07:32 PM |
#10 |
 -
Absolutely /nt |
still_one |
Oct-02-11 09:13 PM |
#36 |
-
So does that mean we have to legalize polygamy, peyote, and human sacrifice? |
Odin2005 |
Oct-02-11 07:46 PM |
#17 |
 -
Good question. |
snagglepuss |
Oct-02-11 08:39 PM |
#30 |
-
It's time to retire the practice of circumcision. |
BenzoDia |
Oct-02-11 08:21 PM |
#29 |
 -
The World Health Organization says its time to reconsider it. |
pnwmom |
Oct-02-11 08:46 PM |
#32 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-02-11 09:46 PM |
#41 |
   -
Here is the information. Sorry if you can't make sense of it. |
pnwmom |
Oct-02-11 10:41 PM |
#46 |
  -
And the British Medical Association, the Royal Dutch Medical Association, Canadian Pediatric Society |
BenzoDia |
Oct-02-11 09:50 PM |
#42 |
 -
And parents and their doctors can certainly consider that, too. |
pnwmom |
Oct-02-11 10:44 PM |
#47 |
 -
The practice or the choice? |
Blacksheep214 |
Oct-02-11 09:22 PM |
#37 |
-
Good. This is a decision for parents and their doctors. |
pnwmom |
Oct-02-11 08:45 PM |
#31 |
-
I wish these "activists" would keep their SNOUTS out of a guy's crouch AND a woman's! |
SoapBox |
Oct-02-11 08:59 PM |
#33 |
-
Without foreskins? |
Remmah2 |
Oct-02-11 09:07 PM |
#34 |
-
Good. |
emilyg |
Oct-02-11 09:23 PM |
#38 |
-
"a San Francisco group opposed to male circumcision" - so |
davidwparker |
Oct-02-11 09:37 PM |
#39 |
-
Jerry Brown comes down on the side of religious freedom and personal choice once again. |
slackmaster |
Oct-02-11 09:39 PM |
#40 |
 -
It's not your personal choice if you are the baby boy who is getting part of dick cut off. |
Manifestor_of_Light |
Oct-02-11 10:30 PM |
#43 |
-
Just because you disagree with the practice doesn't give the cities the right |
pnwmom |
Oct-02-11 11:18 PM |
#48 |
 -
Get your damn facts out of here |
joeglow3 |
Oct-03-11 01:00 PM |
#68 |
-
Lack of religion clouds their judgment??? |
Manifestor_of_Light |
Oct-04-11 04:50 PM |
#84 |
-
Point proven |
joeglow3 |
Oct-04-11 05:31 PM |
#85 |
-
Scientific evidence is not absolute in this case. |
Manifestor_of_Light |
Oct-04-11 06:40 PM |
#86 |
-
There are clear benefits |
joeglow3 |
Oct-04-11 08:19 PM |
#87 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-03-11 07:46 AM |
#58 |
-
+1000 |
Cronus Protagonist |
Oct-03-11 03:41 PM |
#75 |
-
Good! While I'm not a fan of circumcision - |
lynne |
Oct-02-11 10:39 PM |
#45 |
 -
Mutilating children's genitals in the name of religion does not make it right. |
Manifestor_of_Light |
Oct-03-11 11:48 AM |
#61 |
-
Thank God my rights are safe - because I've been considering |
24601 |
Oct-02-11 11:39 PM |
#52 |
 -
Do it. n/t |
ronnie624 |
Oct-03-11 12:03 AM |
#53 |
-
"misdemeanor crime to circumcise a boy before he is 18 years old " |
pnorman |
Oct-03-11 01:30 AM |
#56 |
 -
Your analogy doesn't work, |
ronnie624 |
Oct-03-11 09:27 AM |
#59 |
-
Oh, drat! Did I miss the popcorn? Is it all gone? |
CTyankee |
Oct-03-11 09:36 AM |
#60 |
-
Yikes!! ... but eventually sanity will win the day, I'm sure ... difficult I imagine |
defendandprotect |
Oct-03-11 12:35 PM |
#64 |
-
What bullshit. None of the state's business. It should be challenged on principle alone. |
closeupready |
Oct-03-11 12:53 PM |
#67 |
-
Good. It shouldn't be mandatory either way. n/t |
Lil Missy |
Oct-03-11 02:47 PM |
#73 |
-
It's high time a local government stood up and said |
hughee99 |
Oct-03-11 04:00 PM |
#79 |
-
All we have to do is alow disfigured males to sue as adults. |
Devil_Fish |
Oct-03-11 07:20 PM |
#83 |