You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #62: You're a male, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
NOMOREDRUGWAR Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. You're a male,
so before you need worry yourself about what you would or wouldn't do with your hypothetical child, worry about finding someone to mate with first or a child to adopt. Good luck. My guess is ten years from now you'll still be childless and talking hypothetically about what you'd do with your child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -California prevents ban on male circumcision alp227  Oct-02-11 07:20 PM   #0 
  - Dickhead.  Poll_Blind   Oct-02-11 07:23 PM   #1 
  - Those who love cutting up baby's dicks can rejoice, for now.  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:24 PM   #2 
  - You failed hard  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-02-11 07:29 PM   #6 
  - High school is rough, but don't worry, you'll get through it.  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:32 PM   #9 
     - You lost!!!!  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-02-11 07:41 PM   #14 
        - You're right.  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:44 PM   #16 
  - Besides, it clearly violates the establishment clause.  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-02-11 07:30 PM   #8 
  - The government has been able to ban some religious practices,  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:52 PM   #22 
  - You want religion out of government? How about gov out of religion.  demosincebirth   Oct-02-11 07:36 PM   #11 
  - Yes and no. Consider the FLDS compound. Sometimes government  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:40 PM   #13 
     - You just compared part of a religious ceremony practiced by Jews for thousands of years  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-02-11 07:42 PM   #15 
     - If that argument is not PC enough for you, then consider Peyote. nt  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:49 PM   #19 
     - You have a problem with peyote use in ceremonies?  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-02-11 11:33 PM   #49 
     - There are many who consider removing an infants foreskin "Child Molesting"  AnotherDreamWeaver   Oct-02-11 10:36 PM   #44 
     - Mind your own business big  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-02-11 11:33 PM   #50 
     - You should get together with the people in the Gungeon that oppose state pre-emption of local firear  AtheistCrusader   Oct-03-11 01:08 AM   #54 
        - You're a male,  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-03-11 12:30 PM   #62 
        - I already have an adopted son.  AtheistCrusader   Oct-03-11 12:50 PM   #65 
           - That must burn you up inside right?  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-03-11 01:16 PM   #69 
              - I would not have done it.  AtheistCrusader   Oct-03-11 02:02 PM   #71 
                 - I'm glad my parents did mine  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-03-11 03:47 PM   #77 
                    - Cite to evidence.  AtheistCrusader   Oct-03-11 05:35 PM   #82 
        - Until then,  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-03-11 12:31 PM   #63 
           - Boy, did you miss the mark.  AtheistCrusader   Oct-03-11 12:51 PM   #66 
     - Oh, okay, but on your terms only. I see. nt  demosincebirth   Oct-02-11 07:51 PM   #21 
        - Who else's terms should I use? Why shouldn't I advocate for my own opinions? nt  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:53 PM   #23 
  - Government should stay out of this period. Brown was right to sign it. /nt  still_one   Oct-02-11 09:12 PM   #35 
  - Good, it violates the establishment clause, intrudes unnecessarily into families  Warpy   Oct-02-11 07:25 PM   #3 
  - +1  demosincebirth   Oct-02-11 07:30 PM   #7 
  - Child mutilation is the state's business  Cronus Protagonist   Oct-03-11 05:12 AM   #57 
     - Your opinion isn't enforceable, sorry  Warpy   Oct-03-11 02:59 PM   #74 
  - Good. San Francisco JUST GOT PWNED by the California legislature  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-02-11 07:29 PM   #4 
  - Why are you bashing San Francisco for what a group of whackjobs did?  EFerrari   Oct-02-11 11:36 PM   #51 
     - Probably because their BULLSHIT agenda on this issue  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-03-11 01:17 PM   #70 
        - What part of San Francisco didn't do this is unclear to you?  EFerrari   Oct-03-11 02:26 PM   #72 
           - Did San Francisco residents not put this on the ballot?  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-03-11 03:46 PM   #76 
              - So if some random nut in your town puts a petition together, I can blame you?  EFerrari   Oct-03-11 03:56 PM   #78 
                 - It's not just one random nut  NOMOREDRUGWAR   Oct-03-11 04:10 PM   #80 
                    - It was a random nut that put the petition together, not the city or the county.  EFerrari   Oct-03-11 04:14 PM   #81 
  - Because it is unconstitutional to infringe on religion. Duh. nt  Bonobo   Oct-02-11 07:29 PM   #5 
  - Peyote, and faith-only healing for children, can be prosecuted.  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:37 PM   #12 
  - Good point. I support those too. nt  Bonobo   Oct-02-11 07:48 PM   #18 
     - Are you saying parents should be allowed to let their children die  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:50 PM   #20 
        - Yes, you are misstating my position. nt  Bonobo   Oct-02-11 07:54 PM   #24 
           - OK, what is your position? nt  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 07:55 PM   #25 
              - You mean on the "Faith-Healing" thing?  Bonobo   Oct-02-11 08:01 PM   #26 
                 - I completely agree with that position, and that position infringes on religion.  ZombieHorde   Oct-02-11 08:07 PM   #27 
                    - I am glad we agree. So then we also agree that it is not black and white. nt  Bonobo   Oct-02-11 08:15 PM   #28 
  - Yet, it's done all the time.  AtheistCrusader   Oct-03-11 01:09 AM   #55 
  - Good move, Governor Brown.  Lasher   Oct-02-11 07:32 PM   #10 
  - Absolutely /nt  still_one   Oct-02-11 09:13 PM   #36 
  - So does that mean we have to legalize polygamy, peyote, and human sacrifice?  Odin2005   Oct-02-11 07:46 PM   #17 
  - Good question.  snagglepuss   Oct-02-11 08:39 PM   #30 
  - It's time to retire the practice of circumcision.  BenzoDia   Oct-02-11 08:21 PM   #29 
  - The World Health Organization says its time to reconsider it.  pnwmom   Oct-02-11 08:46 PM   #32 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-02-11 09:46 PM   #41 
  - Here is the information. Sorry if you can't make sense of it.  pnwmom   Oct-02-11 10:41 PM   #46 
  - And the British Medical Association, the Royal Dutch Medical Association, Canadian Pediatric Society  BenzoDia   Oct-02-11 09:50 PM   #42 
     - And parents and their doctors can certainly consider that, too.  pnwmom   Oct-02-11 10:44 PM   #47 
  - The practice or the choice?  Blacksheep214   Oct-02-11 09:22 PM   #37 
  - Good. This is a decision for parents and their doctors.  pnwmom   Oct-02-11 08:45 PM   #31 
  - I wish these "activists" would keep their SNOUTS out of a guy's crouch AND a woman's!  SoapBox   Oct-02-11 08:59 PM   #33 
  - Without foreskins?  Remmah2   Oct-02-11 09:07 PM   #34 
  - Good.  emilyg   Oct-02-11 09:23 PM   #38 
  - "a San Francisco group opposed to male circumcision" - so  davidwparker   Oct-02-11 09:37 PM   #39 
  - Jerry Brown comes down on the side of religious freedom and personal choice once again.  slackmaster   Oct-02-11 09:39 PM   #40 
  - It's not your personal choice if you are the baby boy who is getting part of dick cut off.  Manifestor_of_Light   Oct-02-11 10:30 PM   #43 
     - Just because you disagree with the practice doesn't give the cities the right  pnwmom   Oct-02-11 11:18 PM   #48 
     - Get your damn facts out of here  joeglow3   Oct-03-11 01:00 PM   #68 
        - Lack of religion clouds their judgment???  Manifestor_of_Light   Oct-04-11 04:50 PM   #84 
           - Point proven  joeglow3   Oct-04-11 05:31 PM   #85 
              - Scientific evidence is not absolute in this case.  Manifestor_of_Light   Oct-04-11 06:40 PM   #86 
                 - There are clear benefits  joeglow3   Oct-04-11 08:19 PM   #87 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-03-11 07:46 AM   #58 
     - +1000  Cronus Protagonist   Oct-03-11 03:41 PM   #75 
  - Good! While I'm not a fan of circumcision -  lynne   Oct-02-11 10:39 PM   #45 
  - Mutilating children's genitals in the name of religion does not make it right.  Manifestor_of_Light   Oct-03-11 11:48 AM   #61 
  - Thank God my rights are safe - because I've been considering  24601   Oct-02-11 11:39 PM   #52 
  - Do it. n/t  ronnie624   Oct-03-11 12:03 AM   #53 
  - "misdemeanor crime to circumcise a boy before he is 18 years old "  pnorman   Oct-03-11 01:30 AM   #56 
  - Your analogy doesn't work,  ronnie624   Oct-03-11 09:27 AM   #59 
  - Oh, drat! Did I miss the popcorn? Is it all gone?  CTyankee   Oct-03-11 09:36 AM   #60 
  - Yikes!! ... but eventually sanity will win the day, I'm sure ... difficult I imagine  defendandprotect   Oct-03-11 12:35 PM   #64 
  - What bullshit. None of the state's business. It should be challenged on principle alone.  closeupready   Oct-03-11 12:53 PM   #67 
  - Good. It shouldn't be mandatory either way. n/t  Lil Missy   Oct-03-11 02:47 PM   #73 
  - It's high time a local government stood up and said  hughee99   Oct-03-11 04:00 PM   #79 
  - All we have to do is alow disfigured males to sue as adults.  Devil_Fish   Oct-03-11 07:20 PM   #83 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC