You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: Touching someone else's personal property is not comparable to speech.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
67. Touching someone else's personal property is not comparable to speech..
Edited on Sat Sep-24-11 10:47 AM by No Elephants
I've not heard of instances were people have been jailed for making noise at a concert, such as booing or cheering or singing along (often very badly), even if so doing drowned out the performers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Irvine 11: Jury reaches verdict in free-speech case aggiesal  Sep-23-11 01:50 PM   #0 
  - deliberate & malicious interuptions of a presentation by others have consequences. n  msongs   Sep-23-11 01:56 PM   #1 
  - Yup, these 11 stood up ...  aggiesal   Sep-23-11 01:58 PM   #3 
  - Self-deleted  Kelvin Mace   Sep-23-11 02:18 PM   #10 
  - Indistinguishable from a Governor Reagan speech during the crackdown on students.  JackRiddler   Sep-23-11 04:21 PM   #19 
  - Too bad Tea Baggers weren't held to that standard during Health Care Debate  Bandit   Sep-23-11 06:11 PM   #32 
  - "deliberate & malicious interuptions of a presentation by others have consequences"  Heywood J   Sep-23-11 06:56 PM   #38 
  - People used to practice civility.  Indydem   Sep-23-11 01:57 PM   #2 
  - "Free speech has limits"....did you read that back after you typed it or did you just hit enter?  truebrit71   Sep-23-11 02:05 PM   #4 
  - Free speech has limits.  Indydem   Sep-23-11 02:09 PM   #6 
     - One more time  Kelvin Mace   Sep-23-11 02:24 PM   #11 
     - Sure you can.....  DeSwiss   Sep-23-11 05:52 PM   #29 
     - Was the ballroom on fire?  Psephos   Sep-23-11 10:39 PM   #51 
     - I realize that metaphor is lost on most...... :-/ n/t  DeSwiss   Sep-23-11 11:10 PM   #52 
     - I get your metaphor  Kelvin Mace   Sep-24-11 09:54 AM   #56 
        - '....it clouds the issue."  DeSwiss   Sep-24-11 11:49 AM   #71 
     - And people tell me I'm too literal.  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:12 AM   #59 
     - Thank you for this post.  boppers   Sep-24-11 03:08 PM   #79 
     - "It was pure showmanship"  Heywood J   Sep-23-11 06:50 PM   #35 
  - Rev Falwell main streamed shouting down others when  alfredo   Sep-23-11 02:06 PM   #5 
  - Well then,  Indydem   Sep-23-11 02:10 PM   #7 
     - No, but we should call them out on their rudeness.  alfredo   Sep-23-11 02:15 PM   #9 
     - Nah, it's easier  Kelvin Mace   Sep-23-11 03:19 PM   #14 
        - I'm sure some will agree with you, especially those who  alfredo   Sep-23-11 04:20 PM   #17 
        - Or criminalize malicious organized disruptions of private events.  Kurska   Sep-23-11 04:20 PM   #18 
           - *sigh*  Kelvin Mace   Sep-23-11 04:31 PM   #22 
           - Both were private events, I fail to see the difference because one was free. n/t  Kurska   Sep-23-11 04:40 PM   #23 
              - show me the contract Einstein.  U4ikLefty   Sep-23-11 04:54 PM   #25 
              - "....in a crowded UC Irvine ballroom."  DeSwiss   Sep-23-11 06:01 PM   #30 
              - Hmmm...  Kelvin Mace   Sep-24-11 09:29 AM   #54 
           - Touching someone else's personal property is not comparable to speech..  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:45 AM   #67 
     - This isn't about what "we" should be, but about the rights of all individuals.  JackRiddler   Sep-23-11 04:19 PM   #16 
        - It was a private event, this isn't a first amendment issue. n/t  Kurska   Sep-23-11 04:21 PM   #20 
           - How was it a private event?  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:25 AM   #63 
  - "Now if we don't like someone's message we shout over them and act like animals."  KansDem   Sep-23-11 02:11 PM   #8 
  - Indeed, we should hold ourselves to higher standards. n/t  Kurska   Sep-23-11 02:24 PM   #12 
  - You are free to do so, but voluntarily.  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:27 AM   #64 
  - No one is arresting folk at Fox.  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:25 AM   #62 
  - That only seems to be the case  Kelvin Mace   Sep-23-11 03:08 PM   #13 
     - Brilliant, obvious, and effective  saras   Sep-23-11 06:23 PM   #34 
     - I am not sure every Arab who takes an anti-Israel stance is "left of center."  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:21 AM   #61 
  - The powerful...the rich...and the crazy (as in Perry and Palin) can say all they want...  SoapBox   Sep-23-11 04:16 PM   #15 
  - I generally dislike this form of 'activism', and the defense's argument that  petronius   Sep-23-11 04:26 PM   #21 
  - I agree with everything you say  Kelvin Mace   Sep-24-11 10:01 AM   #57 
  - Fair point. My objection was to the notion that taking away this particular mode of protest  petronius   Sep-24-11 12:24 PM   #76 
  - +1. nt  bemildred   Sep-24-11 10:13 AM   #60 
  - This as all about protecting Israel.  U4ikLefty   Sep-23-11 04:49 PM   #24 
  - disgusting! further proof of the stranglehold that Israel has on most levels of US politics & policy  stockholmer   Sep-23-11 05:34 PM   #26 
  - Orange County, long known as a bastion of civil rights. This verdict will  coalition_unwilling   Sep-23-11 05:39 PM   #27 
  - How many Muslims live in Orange County?  Major Hogwash   Sep-23-11 06:05 PM   #31 
  - It's OK  azureblue   Sep-23-11 05:41 PM   #28 
  - Disrupting speech is NOT free speech! simple as that!  alp227   Sep-23-11 06:21 PM   #33 
  - You know, you're right.  Heywood J   Sep-23-11 06:54 PM   #36 
  - NO, i mean disrupting events like what these students did.  alp227   Sep-23-11 06:56 PM   #37 
     - "disrupting events"  Heywood J   Sep-23-11 06:58 PM   #39 
     - are you seriously comparing the Israeli ambassador speech to a KKK rally?  alp227   Sep-23-11 07:32 PM   #41 
        - A public university is ...  aggiesal   Sep-23-11 07:38 PM   #42 
        - For the sake of the thread, I'm not getting into I/P politics  Heywood J   Sep-23-11 07:44 PM   #43 
        - Why is it so hard to understand the difference between expression and disruption????  alp227   Sep-23-11 08:15 PM   #47 
        - To the protestors, he may be the equivalent. I don't think the way to analyze this is  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:34 AM   #65 
           - The CA Supreme Court actually decided, when it addressed this law, that context  petronius   Sep-24-11 12:10 PM   #74 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-23-11 06:58 PM   #40 
     - Publicly funded university  Kelvin Mace   Sep-24-11 10:04 AM   #58 
  - All together now  Kelvin Mace   Sep-24-11 09:49 AM   #55 
  - Students have no obligation to grant anyone free speech and that is simply true.  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:42 AM   #66 
  - This reminds me of the ruling that matching funds dilute the free speech of the rich.  McCamy Taylor   Sep-23-11 08:03 PM   #44 
  - I thought there were only 10  vminfla   Sep-23-11 08:10 PM   #45 
  - 10 that organized  aggiesal   Sep-23-11 08:13 PM   #46 
     - oh, you mean the 10 incited a riot.  vminfla   Sep-23-11 08:17 PM   #48 
        - You forgot to display the SARCASM icon n/t  aggiesal   Sep-23-11 08:37 PM   #49 
           - What sarcasm  vminfla   Sep-23-11 10:06 PM   #50 
              - Not true ...  aggiesal   Sep-24-11 11:17 AM   #70 
                 - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-24-11 12:00 PM   #72 
                 - True  vminfla   Sep-24-11 02:51 PM   #78 
  - Freedom Works Organized Tea Partiers To Do The Same Thing During HCR Debate  TomCADem   Sep-24-11 12:27 AM   #53 
  - Lesson: don't interrupt the Israeli government anytime anywhere.  plumbob   Sep-24-11 10:54 AM   #68 
  - I don't think we can discuss this thoughtfully without knowing exactly what they were convicted of.  No Elephants   Sep-24-11 10:54 AM   #69 
  - It would have been CPC 403  petronius   Sep-24-11 12:02 PM   #73 
  - I'm sorry, but those students were being rude assholes.  Odin2005   Sep-24-11 12:23 PM   #75 
     - agree, this is indefensible, and why's it so hard to understand the diff  alp227   Sep-24-11 02:02 PM   #77 
     - Were the people who staged protests in the US during the 60s assholes?  Ash_F   Sep-24-11 04:59 PM   #80 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC