You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: The problem, Mr. brown, is these Senators saw opposition to gay marriage [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. The problem, Mr. brown, is these Senators saw opposition to gay marriage
as a violation of their principles. Deal with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -NOM To GOP Senators: “We Pledge $2 Million to Reverse Same-Sex Marriage in New York” brooklynite  Jun-25-11 01:28 PM   #0 
  - Fine, let them commit $2 Mil of their money for this  Not Me   Jun-25-11 01:32 PM   #1 
  - I was going to start a thread on DOMA  HockeyMom   Jun-25-11 01:58 PM   #14 
     - This SCOTUS will never protect GLBT marriage, as the Loving court protected interracial marriage.  No Elephants   Jun-27-11 07:16 AM   #73 
  - Sweet. Divide and conquer. I bet Rove didn't see this coming.  buddysmellgood   Jun-25-11 01:32 PM   #2 
  - They are dividing and conquering themselves.  LetTimmySmoke   Jun-26-11 01:38 AM   #66 
  - Gay marriage has "Implications for small business owners"????  Raven   Jun-25-11 01:36 PM   #3 
  - Teh Gays  Turbineguy   Jun-25-11 01:37 PM   #4 
  - I wondered about that myself....What the hell does THAT have to do with anything???  BlueJazz   Jun-25-11 01:54 PM   #11 
  - Because there is no way to dispute them  Drale   Jun-25-11 01:54 PM   #12 
  - There is no logical argument against gay marriage so all they have left is to try to make up things  totodeinhere   Jun-25-11 02:30 PM   #21 
  - Because they'll be forced to treat same-sex couples who want to get married  Unvanguard   Jun-25-11 02:34 PM   #25 
  - Hell, I remember when the first place my husband and I tried to rent after we got married  calimary   Jun-25-11 08:30 PM   #62 
  - Bed & Breakfasts here in VT are reaping economic rewards  SPedigrees   Jun-25-11 02:38 PM   #29 
  - Bingo! It's interesting when money is to be made for the big  MadMaddie   Jun-25-11 04:54 PM   #48 
  - Hi neighbor! I'm 20 min. south of you. In that little classy town starting with a D. .  Auntie Bush   Jun-25-11 09:34 PM   #64 
  - REPUG extremists attach all their ideologies to Economics!  CarmanK   Jun-25-11 02:41 PM   #30 
  - Because they'd have to cover same-sex spouses under insurance plans.  Lil Missy   Jun-25-11 02:50 PM   #32 
  - Sadlly, many mall business will probably stop providing insurance anyway.  No Elephants   Jun-27-11 07:21 AM   #75 
  - Yes, but not like they think  bluestateguy   Jun-25-11 02:50 PM   # 
  - The wedding industry should benefit  Mz Pip   Jun-25-11 02:56 PM   #35 
  - The assertion is...  Chan790   Jun-25-11 03:04 PM   #36 
  - "might require an employer to extend the same marital benefits"  demigoddess   Jun-25-11 05:20 PM   #51 
     - It doesn't.  Chan790   Jun-25-11 06:05 PM   #53 
  - Yes, wedding planners are going to make a killing.  Starbucks Anarchist   Jun-25-11 03:29 PM   #41 
  - Businesses BOOM when gay marriage/civil unions are passed  LynneSin   Jun-25-11 04:36 PM   #44 
  - Look what it has done in the little Iowa town of ....  Botany   Jun-25-11 05:05 PM   #50 
  - He's right. It does.  jmowreader   Jun-25-11 06:29 PM   #55 
  - Big implications for wedding planners, owners of B&Bs, clergy who marry gay couples, caterers....  yardwork   Jun-25-11 06:37 PM   #56 
  - It does. Florists, reception halls, caterers, providers of formal wear, and on and on will make  No Elephants   Jun-27-11 07:18 AM   #74 
  - It's like watching a two year old screaming in frustration  ruggerson   Jun-25-11 01:37 PM   #5 
  - It is enjoyable but my joy is tempered by the realization that marriage rights do not yet exist in  totodeinhere   Jun-25-11 02:33 PM   #24 
     - And 30 of those 44 have constitutional amendments banning same gender marriage.  No Elephants   Jun-27-11 07:38 AM   #76 
  - Do they really think they have a hope of reversing this in the Assembly?  GodlessBiker   Jun-25-11 01:43 PM   #6 
  - Sadly, the rw reversed ban on capital punishment at great expense to states .... and  defendandprotect   Jun-25-11 02:37 PM   #27 
  - It's theoretically possible. If they could primary every Republican who voted for gay marriage  totodeinhere   Jun-25-11 02:38 PM   #28 
     - That's the Senate. The Assembly is largely dominated by NYC democrats.  GodlessBiker   Jun-25-11 04:00 PM   #43 
     - Exactly, there is like an 80-60 margin in the Assembly in favor.  TheWraith   Jun-25-11 04:37 PM   #45 
     - But, virulent anti-gay Republicans, with all their other pernicious ideas will  MsPithy   Jun-25-11 04:50 PM   #46 
     - not to mention a Dem Governor who would veto any repeal  ruggerson   Jun-25-11 06:22 PM   #54 
     - I agree it's not going to happen. Theoretically,  totodeinhere   Jun-25-11 08:24 PM   #61 
     - Not so fast. Remember Prop 8.  No Elephants   Jun-27-11 07:45 AM   #77 
        - New York doesn't have referendums like that.  yardwork   Jun-27-11 08:29 AM   #80 
  - I hope they end up pledging $200,000,000---they will  fredamae   Jun-25-11 01:43 PM   #7 
  - Are they targeting GOP legislators who voted for gay marriage such as  totodeinhere   Jun-25-11 01:44 PM   #8 
  - No initiative process in NY  customerserviceguy   Jun-25-11 01:54 PM   #13 
  - Good, let 'em waste their money.  Arkana   Jun-25-11 01:46 PM   #9 
  - 58% of New Yorkers support gay marriage  Tempest   Jun-25-11 01:46 PM   #10 
  - As my neighbor would say; "it's time for members of NOM to come out of  Lorien   Jun-25-11 02:06 PM   #15 
  - Let the games begin. Happy karma, thugs.  Metta   Jun-25-11 02:10 PM   #16 
  - Can't we tell these bigots to go fuck themselves yet?  Initech   Jun-25-11 02:15 PM   #17 
  - The problem, Mr. brown, is these Senators saw opposition to gay marriage  BeyondGeography   Jun-25-11 02:16 PM   #18 
  - Infighting-y. More of this please, GOP. nt  onehandle   Jun-25-11 02:22 PM   #19 
  - How kind of them to include a phone number in the release  idiotgardener   Jun-25-11 02:23 PM   #20 
  - ROFLMAO.  Unvanguard   Jun-25-11 02:32 PM   #22 
  - Say?  placton   Jun-25-11 02:33 PM   #23 
  - Well, by "states," they mean right wing nuts. Unless the "states" decide their way, in which  No Elephants   Jun-27-11 07:50 AM   #78 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-25-11 02:36 PM   #26 
  - welcome to DU!  tomm2thumbs   Jun-25-11 02:50 PM   #33 
  - They're pissed off because they live in terror that they won't be able to--  Moonwalk   Jun-25-11 03:15 PM   #38 
     - If the baker wants to refuse them let him  MadMaddie   Jun-25-11 04:57 PM   #49 
     - BTW, that baker knows he won't throw away money. If they want to sell  glowing   Jun-26-11 01:37 PM   #68 
  - Losing battle, even if they get the state senate back a repeal will never pass the assembly.  Kurska   Jun-25-11 02:44 PM   #31 
  - I pledge 2 million to reverse Newt's 3rd marriage  fantomas   Jun-25-11 02:51 PM   #34 
  - No, reverse his 1st divorce!  idiotgardener   Jun-25-11 03:46 PM   #42 
  - As Spock would say..."Specify"  SoapBox   Jun-25-11 03:11 PM   #37 
  - As if no one in the next generation will be gay. Teen suicides by gays have a big effect on  No Elephants   Jun-27-11 07:55 AM   #79 
  - Correct. There is no logical argument. Straight people (and I am  smirkymonkey   Jun-27-11 12:50 PM   #81 
  - Yes, marriage has consequences  Renew Deal   Jun-25-11 03:25 PM   #39 
  - Someone has money.  roody   Jun-25-11 03:28 PM   #40 
  - NOM is funded by the Catholic Church.  yardwork   Jun-25-11 06:39 PM   #57 
  - A whole organization dedicated to stopping people from marrying.  NYC Liberal   Jun-25-11 04:51 PM   #47 
  - NOM Contact info below  benld74   Jun-25-11 05:56 PM   #52 
  - Their sister organization is NOAM  fantomas   Jun-25-11 06:41 PM   #58 
  - Win-win indeed.  bemildred   Jun-25-11 06:49 PM   #59 
  - " fight to protect marriage in New York..."  and-justice-for-all   Jun-25-11 07:20 PM   #60 
  - NOM is nuts  Politicub   Jun-25-11 09:17 PM   #63 
  - NOM? What is that, National Organization of Morans?  NYC_SKP   Jun-25-11 10:48 PM   #65 
  - Sorry, assholes. That ship has sailed.  COLGATE4   Jun-26-11 11:10 AM   #67 
  - Sorry boys, there's already an agreement in place with WAY deeper pockets than yours.  Capn Sunshine   Jun-26-11 02:21 PM   #69 
  - One of my friends has already received several calls from them,  pnwmom   Jun-26-11 05:34 PM   #70 
  - Go ahead and piss $2 million down the drain  ButterflyBlood   Jun-27-11 12:05 AM   #71 
  - Marriage seems to be more protected in Massachusetts than in many red states.  No Elephants   Jun-27-11 07:12 AM   #72 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC