|
Why are you so deliberately uncomprehending and simultaneously deluded?
1) Where have I been 'defensive about this story'?
I haven't, it's in your head.
2) Maybe I feel like a target because of, well, all the people targeting me.
Seriously, I make one comment about the guy's motives and I'm surrounded by harpies screaming that I've somehow 'defended his behavior'. I'm just amazed at the hysteria
3) You claim we all 'get it', yet still cannot manage to explain how.
Her comment was intended to insinuate that this guy is no better than a rapist. Period. That's exactly what she meant, and when I called her on it everyone flew into hysterics. That's people's real problem with me; I call out the bullshit.
Like I have several times.
If you can't produce an explanation, we're done here.
|
| -Jilted ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard |
savalez |
Jun-06-11 07:07 PM |
#0 |
 -
Marriage. What is it for? |
slackmaster |
Jun-06-11 07:09 PM |
#1 |
| -
Loving v Virginia should be the core of this case |
Taverner |
Jun-06-11 07:09 PM |
#2 |
  -
Why? |
savalez |
Jun-06-11 07:13 PM |
#4 |
| -
Yes but it's, at its core, a privacy issue |
Taverner |
Jun-06-11 11:41 PM |
#109 |
| -
Sue his ass for libel, sue him for every single penny he has |
Drale |
Jun-06-11 07:12 PM |
#3 |
| -
The truth is the ultimate defense for such cases |
ProgressiveProfessor |
Jun-06-11 07:15 PM |
#5 |
| -
If its true she can't sue for libel. I'm no lawyer but perhaps she can win a suit for |
snagglepuss |
Jun-06-11 07:16 PM |
#6 |
| -
Did he have a legal obligation to protect her privacy? |
ProgressiveProfessor |
Jun-06-11 07:20 PM |
#8 |
| -
Regardless of privacy. The libel case is quite clear. |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 07:33 PM |
#15 |
| -
How is a libel case quite clear and that he will be taken to the cleaners? The |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 08:02 PM |
#20 |
| -
He basically called her a murderer...abortion is a legal medical procedure. |
Lars39 |
Jun-06-11 08:19 PM |
#32 |
| -
No, he did not call her a murderer. If he did, I would have agreed with |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 08:32 PM |
#37 |
| -
Well... |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 08:37 PM |
#40 |
| -
Murderers kill people without legal authority. That is the diference.nt |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 09:19 PM |
#61 |
| -
But the whole point of this billboard is this guy did not agree with the legality of the abortion |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 10:17 PM |
#84 |
| -
From the picture below it is clear that he opposes abortion being legal. Libel |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 10:30 PM |
#90 |
| -
"shit house lawyer" LOL, projection being what it is... |
liberation |
Jun-07-11 02:04 AM |
#127 |
| -
It's not necessarily libel/slander to say a person killed someone. |
Hosnon |
Jun-07-11 10:13 AM |
#146 |
| -
I don't agree. |
Lars39 |
Jun-06-11 08:53 PM |
#46 |
| -
That is nice, not relevant or enlightening, but nice. nt |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 09:21 PM |
#62 |
| -
Abortion is not murder, and an embryo is not a child. |
PassingFair |
Jun-07-11 07:19 AM |
#135 |
| -
But if she did have an abortion, |
Hosnon |
Jun-07-11 10:15 AM |
#147 |
| -
Bullshit. |
PassingFair |
Jun-07-11 10:33 AM |
#149 |
| -
That's a good point. But the truth is an absolute defense. If I said you killed your skin |
Hosnon |
Jun-07-11 01:20 PM |
#152 |
| -
When I had chemotherapy, it killed the cancer cells in my body. |
Jim Lane |
Jun-07-11 10:38 PM |
#211 |
| -
When my friend had his kidney removed. |
PassingFair |
Jun-07-11 10:44 PM |
#213 |
| -
That's not the point. |
Hosnon |
Jun-07-11 11:13 PM |
#214 |
| -
The kidney did die. The doctor didn't exclaim it because that wasn't the purpose. |
Jim Lane |
Jun-08-11 10:06 AM |
#217 |
| -
Actually he said, "...she killed MY child..." nt |
kenichol |
Jun-08-11 03:14 PM |
#220 |
| -
Because he defamed her character in written (i.e. printed) words in a public manner |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 08:40 PM |
#41 |
| -
The truth is not libelous |
askeptic |
Jun-06-11 09:09 PM |
#53 |
| -
What "truth?" |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 10:19 PM |
#85 |
| -
Just publishing negative information about someone is not |
LisaL |
Jun-06-11 09:11 PM |
#55 |
| -
Nope, it is a printed defamation of character. Look up the definition. |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 10:19 PM |
#86 |
| -
Right after you do it. |
LisaL |
Jun-07-11 12:06 AM |
#113 |
| -
So you're saying you do not know the definition of "defamation of character?" |
liberation |
Jun-07-11 02:07 AM |
#128 |
| -
You are the one who seem to have no clue as to what |
LisaL |
Jun-07-11 07:39 PM |
#203 |
| -
Simple yes or no question. Is the truth a defense to libel? nt |
kelly1mm |
Jun-07-11 01:42 AM |
#123 |
| -
Oh, yes! I can play this game: Is this not a defamation of character in writing, also known as libel |
liberation |
Jun-07-11 02:09 AM |
#129 |
| -
I will answer your question once you answer mine. Is truth an absolute defense to libel? nt |
kelly1mm |
Jun-07-11 12:04 PM |
#151 |
| -
i love all the folks here coming to do one thing: comment only to defend the guy |
CreekDog |
Jun-07-11 09:04 AM |
#140 |
| -
No one is defending the asshole. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 04:19 PM |
#177 |
| -
Did you read the absolute defences to libel when reading that definition? |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 09:23 PM |
#63 |
| -
Because he did not use the term "abortion" he accused her of killing someone. |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 10:24 PM |
#87 |
| -
Killing someone is not always illegal. Capital punishment, military |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 10:37 PM |
#92 |
| -
Technically an abortion is just the termination of a pregnancy |
liberation |
Jun-07-11 02:23 AM |
#131 |
| -
Yes Yes Yes +1 million...nt |
StopTheNeoCons |
Jun-06-11 09:04 PM |
#50 |
| -
If what he put on the billboard is not false info, then it's not libel. |
LisaL |
Jun-06-11 09:10 PM |
#54 |
| -
Unless she didn't have an abortion it isn't libel. |
Kurska |
Jun-06-11 09:48 PM |
#68 |
| -
he's actually admitted he's not sure whether she had an abortion |
rebecca_herman |
Jun-07-11 02:12 AM |
#130 |
| -
Her name, picture or likeness isn't on the billboard... |
snooper2 |
Jun-07-11 09:13 AM |
#142 |
| -
And now anyone with a lick of sense |
Karenina |
Jun-06-11 07:17 PM |
#7 |
| -
+1000 |
valerief |
Jun-06-11 07:31 PM |
#14 |
| -
+2000 |
cosmicone |
Jun-06-11 08:05 PM |
#21 |
| -
Yup. |
surrealAmerican |
Jun-06-11 08:54 PM |
#48 |
| -
"Would you have this asshole's baby?" |
hamsterjill |
Jun-07-11 09:28 AM |
#144 |
| -
Or perhaps just a statistic of how much domestic abuse begins |
gkhouston |
Jun-07-11 10:27 AM |
#148 |
| -
Ha! ... eom |
Kolesar |
Jun-06-11 08:11 PM |
#27 |
| -
indeed! |
fishwax |
Jun-06-11 08:51 PM |
#45 |
| -
And that should be her billboard in response to his. nt |
Ilsa |
Jun-06-11 09:49 PM |
#69 |
| -
I hope no one else will either. |
alarimer |
Jun-07-11 08:20 AM |
#138 |
| -
They really ARE subhuman monsters... |
saras |
Jun-06-11 07:21 PM |
#9 |
| -
Doesn't HIPPA |
tinymontgomery |
Jun-06-11 07:24 PM |
#10 |
| -
I *think* it applies to providers, not John Q Public |
ProgressiveProfessor |
Jun-06-11 07:28 PM |
#11 |
| -
Yea, I don't know |
tinymontgomery |
Jun-06-11 07:52 PM |
#18 |
| -
Your friend is not obligated to keep your medical issues |
LisaL |
Jun-06-11 09:16 PM |
#59 |
| -
Okay |
tinymontgomery |
Jun-06-11 09:45 PM |
#67 |
| -
Your friend is not obligated BY HIPPA to do so, but there's a more general right of privacy. |
Jim Lane |
Jun-07-11 10:40 PM |
#212 |
| -
HIPPA applies broadly, but not to everybody. |
boppers |
Jun-06-11 09:59 PM |
#75 |
| -
Does HIPPA apply to employer/provider only? n/t |
BadgerKid |
Jun-06-11 07:30 PM |
#13 |
| -
it's HIPAA |
Skittles |
Jun-06-11 08:13 PM |
#28 |
| -
HIPAA applies to medical providers. |
LisaL |
Jun-06-11 09:14 PM |
#58 |
| -
I would think defamation of character and slander would also apply. |
Lars39 |
Jun-06-11 07:28 PM |
#12 |
| -
Indeed, the civil case is quite clear. |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 07:35 PM |
#16 |
| -
This man is at the very least emotionally abusive. |
madaboutharry |
Jun-06-11 07:39 PM |
#17 |
| -
What an asshole! |
Odin2005 |
Jun-06-11 07:53 PM |
#19 |
| -
Put up a billboard saying he abused her. And yes, odds are that he did. |
cali |
Jun-06-11 08:06 PM |
#22 |
| -
Instead of courts ... |
cosmicone |
Jun-06-11 08:07 PM |
#23 |
| -
Here's the photo: truly shabby and stupid. |
Judi Lynn |
Jun-06-11 08:07 PM |
#24 |
| -
I don't see the invasion of her privacy... |
RevStPatrick |
Jun-06-11 08:16 PM |
#31 |
| -
It doesn't seem worth pondering to you that anyone who knew her, even superficially, |
Judi Lynn |
Jun-06-11 08:24 PM |
#34 |
| -
Actually, quite a few depending |
gejohnston |
Jun-07-11 12:04 AM |
#112 |
| -
very weird looking individual. n/t |
trud |
Jun-06-11 08:34 PM |
#39 |
| -
He's a real winner. Hard to believe she went anywhere with him in the first place. n/t |
Judi Lynn |
Jun-06-11 08:53 PM |
#47 |
| -
Wouldn't he have to identify the woman for slander or libel? |
ChrisBorg |
Jun-06-11 09:42 PM |
#66 |
| -
hmmm |
rebecca_herman |
Jun-06-11 09:52 PM |
#71 |
| -
One ugly dude! Wow! nt |
Lucky Luciano |
Jun-06-11 11:09 PM |
#103 |
| -
I also encourage anyone to stop doing business with the greedy assholes |
plumbob |
Jun-07-11 01:57 AM |
#125 |
| -
ooh, the douche has a facebook account! |
shanti |
Jun-06-11 08:08 PM |
#25 |
| -
http://www.facebook.com/gfultz |
Kolesar |
Jun-06-11 08:16 PM |
#30 |
| -
The facebook page is kinda strange... |
jmowreader |
Jun-06-11 10:07 PM |
#79 |
| -
The media company should not have allowed him to rent that billboard |
Kolesar |
Jun-06-11 08:10 PM |
#26 |
| -
Well, technically it should be up to the courts to decide what is or isn't libel |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 08:45 PM |
#42 |
| -
Could you expand on why you think she has a clear libel case? Truth |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 09:49 PM |
#70 |
| -
You keep repeating that argument, copy and paste ad infinitum a point makes not. |
liberation |
Jun-06-11 10:26 PM |
#88 |
| -
and you keep failing to recognise that truth is an absolute defense to libel. nt |
kelly1mm |
Jun-06-11 10:41 PM |
#96 |
| -
he admits he doesn't even know if she had an abortion |
rebecca_herman |
Jun-06-11 11:01 PM |
#101 |
| -
The OP link says "her friends" say it was a miscarage. His attorney |
kelly1mm |
Jun-07-11 01:05 AM |
#120 |
| -
If he has to subpoena her medical records, then he could be in even worse shape |
liberation |
Jun-07-11 02:27 AM |
#132 |
| -
the thing that troubles you the most about this story is that she might sue the guy |
CreekDog |
Jun-07-11 09:08 AM |
#141 |
| -
How very strange. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 03:29 PM |
#166 |
| -
they posted again and again on the same issue |
CreekDog |
Jun-07-11 03:54 PM |
#169 |
| -
No, it's actually fantastic to assume, as you have, that the poster cares at all. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 04:04 PM |
#171 |
| -
You found the male who did this a sympathetic character --that's that |
CreekDog |
Jun-07-11 05:55 PM |
#185 |
| -
Absolute bullshit. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 06:13 PM |
#188 |
| -
Then what was it you were not ready to believe about the man who did this? |
CreekDog |
Jun-07-11 06:20 PM |
#189 |
| -
Huh? Where do you get this stuff? |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 06:56 PM |
#195 |
| -
He didn't name her |
leftynyc |
Jun-07-11 08:47 AM |
#139 |
| -
He did name her. His "organization" NANI - her name is Nani. n/t |
tammywammy |
Jun-07-11 05:47 PM |
#183 |
| -
That's a very common asshole pattern. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jun-07-11 05:53 PM |
#184 |
| -
More likely, business before ideology |
gejohnston |
Jun-06-11 11:52 PM |
#111 |
| -
Wow this guy seems very controlling. Good for her because its her body. For me |
southernyankeebelle |
Jun-06-11 08:16 PM |
#29 |
| -
We had a name for guys who acted like this in college |
alcibiades_mystery |
Jun-06-11 08:22 PM |
#33 |
| -
The way this fucker is acting, she did the right thing |
MrScorpio |
Jun-06-11 08:27 PM |
#35 |
| -
Or maybe he's just very upset. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-06-11 09:00 PM |
#49 |
| -
Correction: He should be with someone |
musette_sf |
Jun-06-11 09:12 PM |
#56 |
| -
On the first point, I agree. On the second, I didn't realize he had raped her. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-06-11 09:14 PM |
#57 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-06-11 10:08 PM |
#81 |
| -
Not what she said |
gejohnston |
Jun-07-11 12:08 AM |
#114 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-07-11 12:48 AM |
#117 |
| -
thank you |
musette_sf |
Jun-07-11 02:31 PM |
#154 |
| -
Yes, it is. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 03:11 PM |
#158 |
| -
It was explained to you last night. More than once, as I recall |
petronius |
Jun-07-11 03:30 PM |
#167 |
| -
And not very well. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 04:12 PM |
#174 |
| -
He's not a rapist, as far as we know. And you're the only one who thinks anyone |
petronius |
Jun-07-11 04:30 PM |
#179 |
| -
Then do explain why she even mentioned it. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 06:20 PM |
#190 |
| -
Who insinuated anything about you, and what was it? |
petronius |
Jun-07-11 06:55 PM |
#194 |
| -
It was something to the effect of me 'hating women', and it was more than insinuated. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 06:58 PM |
#196 |
| -
You have a vivid imagination. The only people in that sub-thread were you, me, and |
petronius |
Jun-07-11 07:07 PM |
#199 |
| -
I hate to break this to you, but that subthread wasn't the only exchange I've had |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 07:15 PM |
#200 |
| -
Again, why do you feel that you are a victim or a target here? Why are you so |
petronius |
Jun-07-11 07:21 PM |
#202 |
| -
Wow. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 07:51 PM |
#204 |
| -
"No better than a rapist" =/= 'a rapist' |
petronius |
Jun-07-11 08:17 PM |
#206 |
| -
Wow. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 09:04 PM |
#207 |
| -
Oh, and I'm still waiting for that explanation that was apparently perfect and rational |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 07:06 PM |
#198 |
| -
i don't think THAT was the post that got the subthread deleted LOL n/t |
Scout |
Jun-08-11 07:55 AM |
#215 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jun-06-11 10:17 PM |
#83 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-07-11 01:24 AM |
#121 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-07-11 01:41 AM |
#122 |
| -
We need a new internet "law" similar to Godwin's Law. |
Hosnon |
Jun-08-11 10:54 AM |
#218 |
| -
When you have a child with someone |
Alcibiades |
Jun-06-11 10:40 PM |
#94 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jun-06-11 11:12 PM |
#105 |
| -
He needs to be prevented from reproducing - don't need these genes. |
plumbob |
Jun-07-11 01:59 AM |
#126 |
| -
Definitely a dick move... |
MellowDem |
Jun-06-11 08:32 PM |
#36 |
| -
I guess the question is |
savalez |
Jun-06-11 09:31 PM |
#64 |
| -
I think the word "kill" is the key... |
MellowDem |
Jun-06-11 09:53 PM |
#72 |
| -
This is why contraception exists |
MadMaddie |
Jun-06-11 08:33 PM |
#38 |
| -
Maybe he should have married her & not made a bastard |
Cherchez la Femme |
Jun-06-11 08:45 PM |
#43 |
| -
or wrapped it up beforehand |
shanti |
Jun-06-11 11:31 PM |
#107 |
| -
true too |
Cherchez la Femme |
Jun-08-11 12:58 PM |
#219 |
| -
I would imagine... |
jmowreader |
Jun-06-11 08:48 PM |
#44 |
| -
I love that nt |
demgrrrll |
Jun-06-11 09:04 PM |
#51 |
| -
I like it too. Free speech is free speech, right? |
The Doctor. |
Jun-06-11 09:18 PM |
#60 |
| -
his actions don't necessarily mean he wanted children. |
iemitsu |
Jun-06-11 10:27 PM |
#89 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-06-11 10:40 PM |
#95 |
| -
i am a male and certainly don't believe they are all assholes. |
iemitsu |
Jun-06-11 11:02 PM |
#102 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-06-11 11:21 PM |
#106 |
| -
clearly i don't know the true motivation of the sign poster. |
iemitsu |
Jun-06-11 11:39 PM |
#108 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-07-11 12:50 AM |
#119 |
| -
We simply don't know. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 03:19 PM |
#161 |
| -
his paying for and posting the sign reveals much |
iemitsu |
Jun-07-11 10:36 PM |
#210 |
| -
I have to judge your story by the way you defend the guy in this story's actions |
CreekDog |
Jun-07-11 09:31 AM |
#145 |
| -
I do not 'defend' anyone. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 03:07 PM |
#157 |
| -
This maybe true. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 03:15 PM |
#160 |
| -
oh, poor innocent victim.... |
Scout |
Jun-07-11 03:26 PM |
#164 |
| -
Wow. I'm going to do something for you that you seem incapable of; |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 03:49 PM |
#168 |
| -
Your first caption is a good one, but I'm pretty sure he's already sent that message more |
petronius |
Jun-07-11 12:49 AM |
#118 |
| -
Perhaps.. |
sendero |
Jun-06-11 09:08 PM |
#52 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-06-11 10:01 PM |
#76 |
| -
Harassment and violation of one's privacy is not free speech. |
glinda |
Jun-06-11 09:41 PM |
#65 |
| -
I have an interesting question... |
The Doctor. |
Jun-06-11 09:53 PM |
#73 |
| -
He's going to win every case filed against him. |
Meldread |
Jun-06-11 09:54 PM |
#74 |
| -
allegedly it does name her |
rebecca_herman |
Jun-06-11 10:07 PM |
#80 |
| -
The town only has about 30,000 people. |
Lars39 |
Jun-06-11 10:15 PM |
#82 |
| -
Here is the Billboard: |
Meldread |
Jun-06-11 10:42 PM |
#97 |
| -
Nani is the girlfriend's name. |
Cerridwen |
Jun-06-11 10:57 PM |
#100 |
| -
If that is his idea of humour |
gejohnston |
Jun-07-11 12:17 AM |
#115 |
| -
In another thread, I noted that she should get a protective order and |
Cerridwen |
Jun-07-11 12:28 AM |
#116 |
| -
No problem. I am American who |
gejohnston |
Jun-07-11 05:09 PM |
#182 |
| -
He names her in the billboard (nani) and she already had a previous restraining order against him |
liberation |
Jun-07-11 02:44 AM |
#134 |
| -
Comments from a law prof over coffee this AM |
ProgressiveProfessor |
Jun-07-11 09:22 AM |
#143 |
| -
Anyone who would make a 'billboard' like that is a piece of shit. nt |
BlueIris |
Jun-06-11 10:03 PM |
#77 |
| -
Why? |
The Doctor. |
Jun-06-11 10:06 PM |
#78 |
| -
convinced now? |
CreekDog |
Jun-07-11 02:27 PM |
#153 |
| -
Right, he's a piece of shit. That much is clear. I still disagree with the above statement. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 03:04 PM |
#156 |
| -
What valid, plausible scenarios would validate his actions as moral? |
LanternWaste |
Jun-07-11 03:13 PM |
#159 |
| -
There are any number of reasons. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 03:24 PM |
#162 |
| -
really, really stretching it here LOL |
Scout |
Jun-07-11 03:28 PM |
#165 |
| -
Hey, you asked. And it's hardly a stretch. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 04:03 PM |
#170 |
| -
''That would be a highly moral position.'' |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jun-07-11 04:11 PM |
#173 |
| -
I'm not a fan of 'morality'. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 04:16 PM |
#175 |
| -
What you call ''hysterics'' is the natural reaction to seeing someone try to defend the indefensible |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jun-07-11 04:25 PM |
#178 |
| -
Just what is it that you think I'm defending? |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 06:05 PM |
#186 |
| -
It is painfully obvious and therefore in no need to be pointed out. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jun-07-11 06:10 PM |
#187 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-07-11 06:41 PM |
#192 |
| -
Yes, of course, it's so immensely obvious that you can't point to any of the blatant obviousness |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 08:01 PM |
#205 |
| -
I'm afraid I do not see how your circumstances justify his actions. |
LanternWaste |
Jun-07-11 06:35 PM |
#191 |
| -
Where did I ever say his actions were justified? |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 06:49 PM |
#193 |
| -
"Not that I disagree" |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jun-07-11 04:10 PM |
#172 |
| -
So, I agree with the guy and I ask what his reasoning is. |
The Doctor. |
Jun-07-11 07:03 PM |
#197 |
| -
**FULTZ Posting Domestic Abuse "Jokes" on Twitter** |
Starry Messenger |
Jun-06-11 10:35 PM |
#91 |
| -
I hope the far right latches on to this guy |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody |
Jun-07-11 10:35 PM |
#209 |
| -
Holy crap, check out his twitter! |
tammywammy |
Jun-06-11 10:38 PM |
#93 |
| -
ya, this dude needs some help |
Supply Side Jesus |
Jun-06-11 11:10 PM |
#104 |
| -
Astounding, the guy is literally making death threads against his ex-gf |
liberation |
Jun-07-11 02:34 AM |
#133 |
| -
Freudian Post O' The Month! |
KamaAina |
Jun-07-11 04:19 PM |
#176 |
| -
That was cruel |
GETPLANING |
Jun-06-11 10:43 PM |
#98 |
| -
I take issue with the headline..... |
DeSwiss |
Jun-06-11 10:49 PM |
#99 |
| -
Greg FOOLtz might've stolen the photo too. |
alp227 |
Jun-06-11 11:42 PM |
#110 |
| -
I'd be happy to contribute to a billboard explaining how moronic, |
plumbob |
Jun-07-11 01:53 AM |
#124 |
| -
So he's taking the breakup pretty hard, huh? |
WatsonT |
Jun-07-11 07:49 AM |
#136 |
| -
Kind of amazing that any woman would have found him worth |
JAnthony |
Jun-07-11 08:01 AM |
#137 |
| -
Has he established that it was indeed "his" child? N/T |
indypaul |
Jun-07-11 11:41 AM |
#150 |
| -
If he didn't name her or depict her in another way, can she say he libeled 'her' specifically. |
aikoaiko |
Jun-07-11 02:57 PM |
#155 |
| -
Oh, but he did. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jun-07-11 04:52 PM |
#180 |
| -
Ahh, he tries to be clever with the acronym. I see that. Wonder if that matters? |
aikoaiko |
Jun-07-11 05:05 PM |
#181 |
| -
what a putz! (the boyfriend) |
ellenrr |
Jun-07-11 03:26 PM |
#163 |
| -
Ex-girl friend, not even his wife... |
and-justice-for-all |
Jun-07-11 07:21 PM |
#201 |
| -
Reading Yahoo comments on this story confirms for me...... |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody |
Jun-07-11 10:34 PM |
#208 |
| -
At least the girlfriend knows beyond a doubt that she made the right decision |
Blue_Tires |
Jun-08-11 09:31 AM |
#216 |
| -
Yours is the best perspective I've seen |
kenichol |
Jun-08-11 03:15 PM |
#221 |
| -
abortion is an issue where if the two parties disagree, there's no way to compromise |
yurbud |
Jun-08-11 05:50 PM |
#222 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore