pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-07-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
| 40. You're twisting the timeline. Is that on purpose or do you just not understand? |
|
Edited on Sat May-07-11 06:57 PM by pnwmom
"which he had promised to stream" implies that she saw images AFTER he promised to stream them, which is simply untrue.
First, after setting up his webcam, he came into her room, asked to use the computer, and showed her images for a couple minutes.
The next day, he tweeted to 150 friends that he planned to do it again and make it available for all to see. He didn't mention anything about Molly being involved, just himself. And then Tyler found out and that was the end of the plan.
|
| -Former student accepts deal in Rutgers suicide case |
alp227 |
May-06-11 11:49 PM |
#0 |
-
This isn't due to her social status. It's due to the fact that she didn't plan |
pnwmom |
May-06-11 11:58 PM |
#1 |
 -
OK thanks for clarifying; I didn't check all the facts about what Ravi/Wei did n/t |
alp227 |
May-07-11 12:08 AM |
#2 |
-
She's also agreed to testify against Ravi, her former friend. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 12:13 AM |
#3 |
-
even if it hadn't resulted in death they should have been kicked out |
JI7 |
May-07-11 12:30 AM |
#4 |
 -
They both left Rutgers, though I've never seen actual evidence reported |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 12:37 AM |
#5 |
-
she described the guy Tyler was with as looking "sketchy" with ragged clothes |
JI7 |
May-07-11 12:46 AM |
#6 |
 -
Never heard anything of the sort. Where is that info came from? |
LisaL |
May-07-11 12:52 AM |
#7 |
 -
Are you suggesting she's guilty because she thought someone looked sketchy? |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 12:54 AM |
#8 |
-
no, i'm saying she knew what Ravi was doing |
JI7 |
May-07-11 12:57 AM |
#9 |
-
That doesn't prove anything about what she knew about Ravi's plans. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 01:38 AM |
#10 |
-
I wonder how long she let him continue to live stream the video |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 07:23 AM |
#11 |
-
He didn't stream the video with her at all. After the first time, |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 02:10 PM |
#13 |
 -
I do not believe that is clear. |
LisaL |
May-07-11 04:46 PM |
#16 |
  -
yeah, he did plan to stream the videos and I thought it was pretty clear that was at Molly's |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 04:50 PM |
#17 |
   -
If it was streamed at all, it was during the first encounter. |
LisaL |
May-07-11 04:53 PM |
#18 |
    -
was Molly at the first one only? How woud it not be planned if he set up the camera? |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 04:55 PM |
#20 |
     -
He didn't set up the camera. The camera was on his laptop. |
LisaL |
May-07-11 05:02 PM |
#22 |
      -
by set up I meant pointing it to the target and turning it on, and so he did set it up |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 06:10 PM |
#31 |
     -
He planned it, he set up the camera. Molly didn't have anything to do with that. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 05:34 PM |
#25 |
    -
showed her images of him spying on someone- which he had romised to stream on Twitter |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 06:15 PM |
#33 |
    -
You're twisting the timeline. Is that on purpose or do you just not understand? |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 06:53 PM |
#40 |
    -
So Ravi didn;t set up the camera a second time? Whoa I never heard that.! |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 07:23 PM |
#44 |
    -
I didn't say that. I think I read that his roommate discovered it, |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 08:08 PM |
#45 |
    -
Actually it makes Molly look like she stood by and let it happen again. Maybe thatls why she |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 08:15 PM |
#47 |
    -
How? He tweeted about it, the roommate found out about it, |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 08:18 PM |
#49 |
    -
It was never streamed. And there was no indication |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 05:31 PM |
#24 |
   -
the victims parent referred to Molly's actions as "unlawful" today- what do you think that means?" |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 06:13 PM |
#32 |
   -
I'm not making excuses for Ravi. I support the charges against him. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 07:01 PM |
#41 |
   -
Those are not the "facts." If the images were never streamed, |
LisaL |
May-07-11 08:32 PM |
#52 |
   -
PW was unaware of the reports that images were distributed. |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 09:00 PM |
#54 |
    -
Not true. I knew those claims were initially made, |
pnwmom |
May-08-11 04:05 AM |
#58 |
   -
The claims might be disputed by his defense. |
LisaL |
May-08-11 03:21 PM |
#73 |
   -
Could you show me a link to that quote? |
pnwmom |
May-08-11 03:59 AM |
#57 |
   -
no one is saying Molly distributed them, but you already knew that |
bettyellen |
May-08-11 06:53 AM |
#59 |
   -
Ravi is NOT being prosecuted for disseminating images. |
pnwmom |
May-08-11 12:59 PM |
#67 |
   -
yet the prosecuter said he did share them. So he's being charged w/ lesser crime? |
bettyellen |
May-08-11 01:15 PM |
#68 |
   -
No, he isn't being charged with lesser crime. |
LisaL |
May-08-11 03:18 PM |
#72 |
   -
Why do you keep saying that? |
LisaL |
May-08-11 03:16 PM |
#71 |
   -
that's what I thought, but I rmember there being speculation about another charge |
bettyellen |
May-08-11 04:22 PM |
#74 |
   -
It never got streamed at all -- whatever Ravi had planned. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 05:29 PM |
#23 |
  -
no "webcast" just images and maybe video clips then? |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 06:39 PM |
#38 |
  -
No images were broadcast on the internet. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 08:16 PM |
#48 |
  -
It was pretty well established that the victim stopped it, certainly not Molly, LOL. |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 09:04 PM |
#55 |
  -
The prosecution initially claimed that, but withdrew that claim. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 05:51 PM |
#28 |
 -
wasn't that ONLY because the victim found out the camera was set up- again? |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 06:22 PM |
#36 |
  -
Could be. But Molly was only involved in the first incident. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 06:49 PM |
#39 |
 -
i thought that is the one he disributed images from |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 07:16 PM |
#43 |
 -
She wasn't charged with distributing any images. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 08:21 PM |
#50 |
 -
I didn't say she was. I;m saying it looks like she knew he had done it |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 08:30 PM |
#51 |
 -
"It looks like" isn't evidence of anything. |
pnwmom |
May-08-11 03:55 AM |
#56 |
 -
I had never seen reports that someone told Tyler, did you? |
bettyellen |
May-08-11 07:12 AM |
#60 |
  -
Tyler actually found out from checking Ravi's tweeter feeds. |
LisaL |
May-08-11 10:29 AM |
#65 |
 -
okay, so she was making that shit up. I know I specualted Molly say the tweets or heard the gossip |
bettyellen |
May-08-11 01:19 PM |
#70 |
 -
Nobody told Tyler. Tyler found out from checking Ravi's tweeter |
LisaL |
May-08-11 10:29 AM |
#64 |
 -
she's crazy to speculate that Molly told Tyler, and dishonest to minimize the second attempt by |
bettyellen |
May-08-11 12:58 PM |
#66 |
 -
Im not interested in what Molly;s lawyer says, but thanks! |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 06:29 PM |
#37 |
 -
It seems they (he?) planned on streaming from Molly's place. |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 04:53 PM |
#19 |
-
The police say it wasn't streamed. Isn't that good enough for you? |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 05:39 PM |
#26 |
-
very private images did get out on the internet, and Molly was among those who knew where they came |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 06:20 PM |
#35 |
 -
Show me a link that proves that. I've never seen that stated anywhere. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 07:04 PM |
#42 |
-
here: |
bettyellen |
May-08-11 09:43 AM |
#63 |
-
That's not what prosecution says. |
LisaL |
May-07-11 08:33 PM |
#53 |
-
it's interesting of all the things that have been said |
JI7 |
May-07-11 04:15 PM |
#14 |
-
sounds like she participated -or her lawyers would be all over the news |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 04:58 PM |
#21 |
 -
She's pleaded not guilty. But, in any case, the only thing |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 05:58 PM |
#29 |
-
There was never any indication that she was involved with the planning. |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 05:44 PM |
#27 |
-
she wondered what he was doing LOL, you mean Ravi didn;t tell her like he did all of Rutgers? HA. |
bettyellen |
May-07-11 06:18 PM |
#34 |
-
Why do you keep distorting the timeline? He didn't tweet about it |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 08:12 PM |
#46 |
-
I think you need to get up to speed with this. Sorry, you missed quite a bit of reporting. |
bettyellen |
May-08-11 07:15 AM |
#61 |
-
That's Called "Accessory" IIRC |
NashVegas |
May-08-11 08:56 AM |
#62 |
-
It's a plea to testify against Ravi. She'll be able to testify as to what he said, |
msanthrope |
May-07-11 07:47 AM |
#12 |
-
Considering prosecutors recently brought additional charges |
LisaL |
May-07-11 04:43 PM |
#15 |
-
I doubt that, too. n/t |
pnwmom |
May-07-11 05:59 PM |
#30 |
-
They might--if only to avoid appeals that might not work out in their |
msanthrope |
May-08-11 01:18 PM |
#69 |