90. I'd suggest that that clause is what put this contract over the top.
It must have caused quite the ruckus internally, especially with some staff already quite involved in LGBT advocacy.
I doubt the clause was simply "overlooked" and wonder if there wasn't some less than honest dealings among those who accepted the contract, which then burdened the firm.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
