opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-30-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 23. A tad supect despite his many years in office...but linked to Scientology thingy |
| -Clinton To Congress: Obama Would Ignore Your War Resolutions |
kpete |
Mar-30-11 04:10 PM |
#0 |
 -
It was a nice republic while it lasted. n/t |
EFerrari |
Mar-30-11 04:11 PM |
#1 |
 -
No kidding. |
enlightenment |
Mar-30-11 04:14 PM |
#3 |
| -
yep. because it most certainly is a republic no longer. |
ixion |
Mar-30-11 04:31 PM |
#10 |
 -
I know when the republic died |
Baby Bear |
Mar-30-11 09:20 PM |
#48 |
| -
Yes sireee. |
avaistheone1 |
Mar-31-11 10:12 AM |
#62 |
| -
One more time, with feeling: The Presidency Should be Abolished |
Jack Rabbit |
Mar-31-11 02:19 PM |
#85 |
| -
Clear, official notice that Obama thinks he's above the law |
FiveGoodMen |
Mar-30-11 04:12 PM |
#2 |
| -
That notice came when he refused to prosecute BushCo. n/t |
EFerrari |
Mar-30-11 04:20 PM |
#6 |
| -
The US has had an imperial presidency for a few decades now |
liberation |
Mar-30-11 04:20 PM |
#7 |
| -
Nothing like what it has been since 911. Constitution in shreds. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 11:14 AM |
#66 |
| -
Now that was Spinely to stick up for the Spineful President....indicating the GOP is flummoxed |
opihimoimoi |
Mar-30-11 04:15 PM |
#4 |
| -
The US Constitution is becoming tattered and torn all in the name of |
lumpy |
Mar-30-11 04:31 PM |
#11 |
| -
I don't think so.... |
opihimoimoi |
Mar-30-11 05:18 PM |
#20 |
| -
The constitution has a clause to specifically prevent standing armies. |
caseymoz |
Mar-30-11 06:09 PM |
#34 |
| -
No it doesn't |
ttwiddler |
Mar-30-11 10:56 PM |
#53 |
| -
Sorry, you're so wrong, yes it does!! |
caseymoz |
Mar-31-11 09:49 AM |
#58 |
| -
Legal constraints on executive power are silly? How Nixonian! |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 11:45 AM |
#70 |
| -
Congress may authorize an army, but only for 2 years at a time. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 02:08 PM |
#84 |
| -
Well, as long as YOU don't THINK so, it must be as you say. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 11:20 AM |
#68 |
| -
don't know if you caught this or not, but brad sherman is a dem.. |
frylock |
Mar-30-11 05:09 PM |
#19 |
| -
A tad supect despite his many years in office...but linked to Scientology thingy |
opihimoimoi |
Mar-30-11 05:23 PM |
#23 |
| -
Of course your ad hominems and narrative are not suspect at all... |
liberation |
Mar-30-11 05:57 PM |
#29 |
| -
The negative narrative in our society has reached imbalanced levels... |
opihimoimoi |
Mar-30-11 06:03 PM |
#31 |
| -
Right... |
liberation |
Mar-30-11 06:06 PM |
#33 |
| -
Lots of imbalance of all kinds. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 01:35 PM |
#78 |
| -
suspect in what respect? |
frylock |
Mar-30-11 06:55 PM |
#40 |
| -
A true believer automatically finds him suspect because he's not |
ThomCat |
Mar-31-11 09:50 AM |
#59 |
| -
Remind us which President said he'd override a war vote by Congress. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 11:18 AM |
#67 |
| -
The imperial presidency, an impeachable offense. |
Metta |
Mar-30-11 04:20 PM |
#5 |
| -
So..... |
DeSwiss |
Mar-30-11 04:23 PM |
#8 |
| -
Illegal shortcut to war. |
lumpy |
Mar-30-11 04:29 PM |
#9 |
| -
I was sort of for this action on behalf of Libya before I'm now against it. I'm |
monmouth |
Mar-30-11 04:37 PM |
#12 |
| -
and in breaking news, the President states he will simple ignore the Articles of Impeachment........ |
stockholmer |
Mar-30-11 04:40 PM |
#13 |
| -
The repubs may attempt to impeach the President. nt |
Zorra |
Mar-30-11 04:44 PM |
#14 |
| -
On what? |
Iliyah |
Mar-30-11 04:51 PM |
#15 |
| -
You're assuming the Koch snorters are rational beings |
Jack Rabbit |
Mar-31-11 03:03 PM |
#89 |
| -
we don`t have the ability to fight another land war... |
madrchsod |
Mar-30-11 05:05 PM |
#16 |
| -
Hell, we do not have the ability to deal with Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan without driving our |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 11:51 AM |
#71 |
| -
What? |
abelenkpe |
Mar-30-11 05:05 PM |
#17 |
| -
decider 2: electric bugaloo |
frylock |
Mar-30-11 05:07 PM |
#18 |
| -
Funny, his ardents are always claiming his powers are very |
Bluenorthwest |
Mar-30-11 05:19 PM |
#21 |
| -
To be fair the extent of their stance has been that if Obama does it, it must be for a reason |
liberation |
Mar-30-11 06:02 PM |
#30 |
| -
it will be even more entertaining when the self-fufilling prophecy of president palin.. |
frylock |
Mar-30-11 06:18 PM |
#36 |
| -
OFGS...that Palin/Bachman thing is the Powers that Be Pushing to keep Obama in Power... |
KoKo |
Mar-31-11 09:16 PM |
#102 |
| -
"Funny, his ardents are always claiming his powers are very limited" |
Gravel Democrat |
Mar-31-11 01:19 AM |
#55 |
| -
It's also funny that the only time Obama shows a spine is when |
ThomCat |
Mar-31-11 09:55 AM |
#60 |
| -
So long representative government the last nail went into your coffin. n/t |
abqmufc |
Mar-30-11 05:22 PM |
#22 |
| -
I don't think a resolution carries the force of law. |
Wilms |
Mar-30-11 05:27 PM |
#24 |
| -
Not so simple. Start with the Constitution, which gives Congress the |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 12:44 PM |
#72 |
| -
Too late to edit, but year of War Powers Resolution is wrong. I apologize. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 01:53 PM |
#80 |
| -
Thanks for the response. |
Wilms |
Mar-31-11 07:04 PM |
#94 |
| -
Hope President Obama is enjoying his Nobel Peace Prize. |
democrank |
Mar-30-11 05:44 PM |
#25 |
| -
I don't support Obama generally, nor do I support wars |
oNobodyo |
Mar-30-11 05:44 PM |
#26 |
| -
Those of us who think that he should follow the War Powers Resolutions, |
amandabeech |
Mar-30-11 05:51 PM |
#28 |
| -
"I don't support Obama generally, nor do I support wars..." |
liberation |
Mar-30-11 06:03 PM |
#32 |
| -
True enough... |
oNobodyo |
Mar-30-11 06:24 PM |
#37 |
| -
Based on what you've said, you support certain wars. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 01:20 PM |
#76 |
| -
"So far Libya has been done correctly and it's saved lives." ???? |
Frank Ness |
Mar-31-11 10:06 AM |
#61 |
| -
What in the Constitutiion gives the Senate authority to pass a Resolution like that? |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 01:07 PM |
#73 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-30-11 05:47 PM |
#27 |
| -
oh for pity's sake. |
cali |
Mar-30-11 07:42 PM |
#44 |
| -
Yeah, no shit |
Avant Guardian |
Mar-31-11 10:32 AM |
#64 |
| -
It's awful, but the irony is bittersweet. |
caseymoz |
Mar-30-11 06:13 PM |
#35 |
| -
This still getting to be a worse nighmare than the day before... |
bluesmail |
Mar-30-11 06:25 PM |
#38 |
| -
"Fascism du jour." Did you just make that up? I'm jealous. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 01:43 PM |
#79 |
| -
Okay hold it - since Reagan was in office we have been TOLD they could deploy |
underpants |
Mar-30-11 06:25 PM |
#39 |
| -
It's 60, although that was an expansion, too, iirc. n/t |
EFerrari |
Mar-30-11 06:56 PM |
#41 |
| -
Please see Reply 72. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 01:59 PM |
#81 |
| -
Go ahead. Make him ignore them and then do what you need to do Congress |
Catherina |
Mar-30-11 07:36 PM |
# |
| -
and what is it that you think they'd need to do? |
cali |
Mar-30-11 07:41 PM |
#43 |
| -
Nothing will be done, except maybe more bloviating. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 02:54 PM |
#88 |
| -
I'm not holding my breath either. n/t |
Catherina |
Mar-31-11 08:24 PM |
#96 |
| -
I've always thought that the War Powers Act had Constitutional |
24601 |
Mar-30-11 07:36 PM |
#42 |
| -
Obama was "lecturer in law" was not a "professor", and there is a difference. |
amandabeech |
Mar-30-11 08:55 PM |
#47 |
| -
Politically flawed, morally flawed - yes. Constitutionally flawed - no, |
24601 |
Mar-31-11 03:43 AM |
#57 |
| -
Wha? Are you saying the Constitution is not Constitutionally flawed since |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 02:35 PM |
#87 |
| -
Many think that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional, BUT that analysis |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 02:21 PM |
#86 |
| -
Why, how very special. |
Stinky The Clown |
Mar-30-11 08:06 PM |
#45 |
| -
And somehow everyone neglects the fact that we didn't put any people on the ground in Libya. |
Arkana |
Mar-30-11 08:29 PM |
#46 |
| -
It has been reported this evening that the CIA is on the ground and has been for some time. |
amandabeech |
Mar-30-11 09:31 PM |
#49 |
| -
CIA is in Libya and likely Special Forces. |
EFerrari |
Mar-30-11 09:31 PM |
#50 |
| -
CIA is in every country. |
joshcryer |
Mar-30-11 09:56 PM |
#52 |
| -
No boots on the ground = no war? |
WatsonT |
Mar-31-11 02:01 PM |
#83 |
| -
You don't think there are "boots on ground" in Libya? CIA wears Sneakers? |
KoKo |
Mar-31-11 09:20 PM |
#103 |
| -
Obama is building a precident for an imperial "presidency". asdfasdfsda!!! (nt) |
w4rma |
Mar-30-11 09:43 PM |
#51 |
| -
This is stupid |
ttwiddler |
Mar-30-11 11:01 PM |
#54 |
| -
Queen Hillary got the warfever |
Baclava |
Mar-31-11 01:27 AM |
#56 |
| -
Did it say "Hillary Would Ignore Your War Resolutions?" |
Avant Guardian |
Mar-31-11 10:30 AM |
#63 |
| -
I just have the feeling that this is Hillary's War, and Obama is being dragged along |
Baclava |
Mar-31-11 01:10 PM |
#74 |
| -
Is your hypothesis that he's lame, helpless, not too bright, too easily led?? |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 04:39 PM |
#91 |
| -
No, I just think Hillary wants Moe's head on a stick and she's gonna by gawd get it |
Baclava |
Mar-31-11 07:53 PM |
#95 |
| -
That dog won't hunt, Obama's her boss. She does his bidding, not the other way round. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 04:51 PM |
#92 |
| -
Maybe the Queen has aspirations for higher office. You can't tell me she's not out for blood. |
Baclava |
Mar-31-11 08:45 PM |
#98 |
| -
I agree with Obama/Clinton on this one..... |
Keith Bee |
Mar-31-11 11:03 AM |
#65 |
| -
We can ignore laws, even the Constitution, at will? Please see Reply # 72. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 01:25 PM |
#77 |
| -
Must be more to it than just the RW...though. That's a pretty harsh statement from her.. |
KoKo |
Mar-31-11 09:15 PM |
#101 |
| -
Isn't having an Emperor grand? What could possibly go wrong? |
harun |
Mar-31-11 11:21 AM |
#69 |
| -
Emperor in chief. nt |
ProgressIn2008 |
Mar-31-11 01:16 PM |
#75 |
| -
They wanted to anoint George Washington as King. |
F Bastiat |
Mar-31-11 04:33 PM |
#90 |
| -
Yeehaw! Let's kill us some ferriners |
WatsonT |
Mar-31-11 01:59 PM |
#82 |
| -
I recall folks saying Obama could not possibly have the $$ to close Gitmo unless Congress voted. |
No Elephants |
Mar-31-11 05:13 PM |
#93 |
| -
"The White House would forge ahead with military action in Libya..." |
unkachuck |
Mar-31-11 08:33 PM |
#97 |
| -
How would Senator Obama respond? n/t |
rayofreason |
Mar-31-11 09:13 PM |
#99 |
| -
Oh My..That's pretty harsh. Hard to know what's going on with that... |
KoKo |
Mar-31-11 09:13 PM |
#100 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread