You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #24: Is Australia planning to nuke itself in the future -- or are they doing it now? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Is Australia planning to nuke itself in the future -- or are they doing it now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Report: Emissions from Japan plant approach Chernobyl levels Octafish  Mar-24-11 05:47 PM   #0 
  - Oh, great.  Wednesdays   Mar-24-11 05:47 PM   #1 
  - And how about this little addition at the bottom:  Sabriel   Mar-24-11 05:53 PM   #2 
  - lthey are staslling because they know a large portion of Japan may be uninhabitable and where ....  ElsewheresDaughter   Mar-24-11 08:16 PM   #16 
     - This could very well be the case  slay   Mar-25-11 04:13 AM   #44 
     - lead dust needs to be part of that, not ingots but dust like a dentist gown  StarsInHerHair   Mar-26-11 08:42 PM   #109 
     - No way. If we drop a mk-82 nuclear bomb set to yield 250KTs on that plant  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 09:35 AM   #58 
        - How much  Aerows   Mar-25-11 10:09 AM   #61 
        - In tokyo sure..  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 10:23 AM   #64 
           - My B.S. is in Chemistry  Aerows   Mar-25-11 12:26 PM   #74 
              - CS and Astronomy.  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 12:49 PM   #76 
        - and the falout was all on NY state....LA was safe ..It was a good day when we didn't have rain in NY  ElsewheresDaughter   Mar-26-11 05:29 AM   #92 
  - Oh, joy. "Tell the people of Japan to run!"  aquart   Mar-24-11 05:57 PM   #3 
  - Run where?  RC   Mar-24-11 06:07 PM   #4 
  - Not from what was measured there, but on their math...  BrookBrew   Mar-24-11 06:13 PM   #5 
  - you should move there to comfort the People There  fascisthunter   Mar-24-11 06:34 PM   #7 
  - This the 2nd post where I thought the same thing. nt  nc4bo   Mar-24-11 07:40 PM   #12 
     - Obviously...  Aerows   Mar-25-11 10:13 AM   #63 
        - Forgive me for saying so, but you come off sounding like a complete idiot  psychopomp   Mar-25-11 07:00 PM   #91 
  - Japan is so lucky  marions ghost   Mar-24-11 07:06 PM   #8 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-24-11 07:32 PM   #10 
  - Well if the bombs  marions ghost   Mar-24-11 07:40 PM   #11 
     - Well I will wait for the hiroshima levels of exposure  BrookBrew   Mar-24-11 07:44 PM   #13 
  - Did you read the chart?  Taft_Bathtub   Mar-24-11 08:09 PM   #15 
     - You are new here, so I will be gentle. Being exposed 24/7 does not compare  thereismore   Mar-24-11 08:46 PM   #18 
     - Please, read the chart  Taft_Bathtub   Mar-24-11 09:00 PM   #20 
     - OK, there you go. It's like getting 1 dental X-ray every fucking day for as long as you stay there.  thereismore   Mar-24-11 09:08 PM   #23 
     - No doctor  marions ghost   Mar-24-11 11:22 PM   #28 
     - jesus.... you don't wanna get it.  fascisthunter   Mar-25-11 09:20 AM   #56 
     - Whoops, double post, nt  Taft_Bathtub   Mar-24-11 09:00 PM   #21 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-24-11 10:23 PM   #25 
     - It's OK  marions ghost   Mar-24-11 11:33 PM   #29 
     - right  marions ghost   Mar-24-11 11:21 PM   #27 
     - You don't get a dental x-ray 24-7. Radiation is cumulative ya know. NT  Devil_Fish   Mar-24-11 11:51 PM   #32 
  - One chest x-ray can cause cancer if ur very unlucky. We stopped the tests, next stop the power plant  grahamhgreen   Mar-25-11 12:11 AM   #35 
  - You know, you are the first person to get on my ignore list  Aerows   Mar-25-11 10:11 AM   #62 
  - and they haven't raised the accident rating - why?  jpak   Mar-24-11 06:21 PM   #6 
  - They're saving up the panic for one Mother-Of-All-Panics.....  Junkdrawer   Mar-24-11 07:07 PM   #9 
     - I rather enjoyed reading the cleverly-written USA article including...  hayu_lol   Mar-24-11 08:05 PM   #14 
        - Who's telling you to go to Mars? It reports radioactivity levels from 5 locations around the world.  Octafish   Mar-24-11 09:07 PM   #22 
           - Not much news coming out  marions ghost   Mar-24-11 11:39 PM   #30 
           - I Just come here and Have to Shake my Head  fascisthunter   Mar-25-11 09:27 AM   #57 
              - Lets see. I am confused. Now I live with a Nuclear Med Engineer  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 10:37 AM   #65 
                 - I don't trust anything you have to say  fascisthunter   Mar-25-11 11:43 AM   #71 
                    - Be sure to buy a SHITTON of KI tabs. A lead line room, 3 pallets  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 01:23 PM   #79 
                       - The Japanese affected by this tragedy surely will appreciate your ridicule  reorg   Mar-25-11 04:32 PM   #84 
                          - Yep, I am not saying the bombs had no impact. They clearly did..  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 04:38 PM   #87 
                          - My only ridicule is pointed to the fear mongers and the soap boxers  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 04:42 PM   #88 
                             - I don't see any fearmongers  reorg   Mar-25-11 04:56 PM   #90 
                                - No I find the end is neigh people funny  BrookBrew   Mar-26-11 01:20 PM   #94 
                                   - studies estimate that Chernobyl caused between 200,000 and one million premature deaths  reorg   Mar-26-11 03:22 PM   #97 
  - Talking it down...  Prana69   Mar-24-11 08:43 PM   #17 
  - Is Australia planning to nuke itself in the future -- or are they doing it now?  defendandprotect   Mar-24-11 09:18 PM   #24 
     - Not nuclear weapons, but possibly nuclear power...  Prana69   Mar-24-11 10:29 PM   #26 
        - I hope Australians  marions ghost   Mar-24-11 11:44 PM   #31 
        - Sad --  defendandprotect   Mar-25-11 12:03 AM   #33 
  - K&R....n/t  unkachuck   Mar-24-11 08:49 PM   #19 
  - Somehow, we have to get the nukers to "put down the weapon".  grahamhgreen   Mar-25-11 12:07 AM   #34 
  - From the original article:  Hannah Bell   Mar-25-11 12:32 AM   #36 
  - the article alerts us of possible grave consequences of the disaster  reorg   Mar-25-11 12:56 AM   #37 
  - I showed you the original. There are substantial differences between it & how it's reported in the  Hannah Bell   Mar-25-11 01:20 AM   #38 
     - ok, see post #39  reorg   Mar-25-11 02:15 AM   #40 
        - i am questioning the accuracy of the reporting about what *this* report actually says.  Hannah Bell   Mar-25-11 03:17 AM   #43 
           - see post #43, I dont see any contradictions  reorg   Mar-25-11 10:51 AM   #68 
  - some corrections  reorg   Mar-25-11 02:13 AM   #39 
     - if you speak german, i'll accept your translation over google's. however, i don't understand  Hannah Bell   Mar-25-11 04:56 AM   #46 
        - It doesn't appear these numbers are taken from the ZAMG website  reorg   Mar-25-11 10:47 AM   #66 
           - zamg is linked as the source of the estimates in articles about it:  Hannah Bell   Mar-25-11 12:20 PM   #73 
              - Really, I have no idea what you are trying to do here  reorg   Mar-25-11 02:54 PM   #80 
                 - zamg, & the page i linked, have been linked as the source document  Hannah Bell   Mar-25-11 04:10 PM   #82 
                 - yawn, the page you linked is NOT the source document for the NS article  reorg   Mar-25-11 04:25 PM   #83 
                    - If there is some other report the new scientist article is based on, please link it.  Hannah Bell   Mar-25-11 04:35 PM   #86 
                       - the source for the article cited in the OP is the New Scientist  reorg   Mar-25-11 04:49 PM   #89 
                          - zamg is the source for the new scientist article. it's where the estimates & the analysis originate.  Hannah Bell   Mar-26-11 01:14 PM   #93 
                             - sigh, Dr. Wotawa from the ZAMG is the source cited by the New Scientist  reorg   Mar-26-11 02:26 PM   #95 
                                - zamg is the source for the analysis & extrapolations. wotawa is their employee  Hannah Bell   Mar-26-11 02:47 PM   #96 
                                   - the page you linked is NOT the source for the New Scientist report  reorg   Mar-26-11 03:27 PM   #98 
                                      - you can bluster all you like. the zamg report is the source for the new scientist  Hannah Bell   Mar-26-11 04:13 PM   #99 
                                         - The New Scientist obviously talked to Dr Wotawa like any reporter would do  reorg   Mar-26-11 05:49 PM   #101 
                                            - they didn't just "talk to" wotawa. the estimates are *from* wotawa & zamg.  Hannah Bell   Mar-26-11 05:53 PM   #103 
                                               - So?  reorg   Mar-26-11 05:55 PM   #104 
                 - did you even read the updated versions? from the 25th  Hannah Bell   Mar-26-11 04:41 PM   #100 
                    - I already pointed this out in post #39  reorg   Mar-26-11 05:51 PM   #102 
                       - there is nothing about foodstuffs in this link.  Hannah Bell   Mar-26-11 05:58 PM   #105 
                          - I provided the links in post #39  reorg   Mar-26-11 06:07 PM   #106 
                             - i'm not talking about the brief from the 23rd, i'm talking about the update from the 25th.  Hannah Bell   Mar-26-11 06:09 PM   #107 
                                - okay, let's keep this thread kicked  reorg   Mar-26-11 06:27 PM   #108 
  - K&R  DeSwiss   Mar-25-11 02:26 AM   #41 
  - Tokyo is just 80 miles away. The world may be in for a huge shakeup before long.  Kablooie   Mar-25-11 02:36 AM   #42 
  - 80 miles, 170 miles, what does it matter?  Hannah Bell   Mar-25-11 04:37 AM   #45 
  - Chernobyl affected 150,000k. That's a radius of about 240 miles.  Kablooie   Mar-25-11 12:11 PM   #72 
  - Wow.. If the USAF right now dropped a B-61 thermonuclear weapon on that plant  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 09:43 AM   #60 
  - Accumulated 24-Hour Radiation 30 Km Northwest of Fukushima Exeeds Annual Limit on Natural Dose  Hissyspit   Mar-25-11 07:53 AM   #47 
  - What does that mean?  grahamhgreen   Mar-25-11 07:53 AM   #48 
  - It means that getting cancer or getting radiation poison  sakabatou   Mar-25-11 07:53 AM   #49 
     - I qonder how long before that exposure would lead to radiation sickness?  grahamhgreen   Mar-25-11 07:53 AM   #50 
        - not radiation sickness, but increased rates of cancer, genetic defects, deformed babies etc. n/t  reorg   Mar-25-11 07:53 AM   #52 
        - Lifetimes..  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 09:39 AM   #59 
           - I've seen that chart, but remember even one x-ray has a chance of giving you cancer.  grahamhgreen   Mar-25-11 12:34 PM   #75 
              - And one drink can kill your liver  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 12:51 PM   #77 
                 - The idea is to reduce one's exposure to radiation to a minimum.  grahamhgreen   Mar-25-11 03:50 PM   #81 
                    - Yes of course. However there is a long way from this event to hiroshima  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 04:32 PM   #85 
  - more details  reorg   Mar-25-11 07:53 AM   #51 
  - Very confused language  caraher   Mar-25-11 07:53 AM   #53 
     - yes, "natural" is a bad choice of words  reorg   Mar-25-11 07:53 AM   #54 
  - k&r Thanks Octafish n/t  Hotler   Mar-25-11 08:07 AM   #55 
     - Thanks Hannah for the remarks about the poor quality of the...  hayu_lol   Mar-25-11 10:48 AM   #67 
        - the poor quality of Hannah's Google translation is obvious  reorg   Mar-25-11 10:59 AM   #69 
           - thank you...  fascisthunter   Mar-25-11 11:42 AM   #70 
              - Be sure to read "The Road" its a great tutorial  BrookBrew   Mar-25-11 12:59 PM   #78 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC