Taft_Bathtub
(197 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-24-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 20. Please, read the chart |
|
It says that's the radiation you get from one day. So living near Fukushima is barely more radioactive than living in the Colorado mountains. Or getting a daily x-ray for cavities.
Again, I know it's really popular to freak out about radiation, but the media is freaking people out for no reason.
|
| -Report: Emissions from Japan plant approach Chernobyl levels |
Octafish |
Mar-24-11 05:47 PM |
#0 |
 -
Oh, great. |
Wednesdays |
Mar-24-11 05:47 PM |
#1 |
| -
And how about this little addition at the bottom: |
Sabriel |
Mar-24-11 05:53 PM |
#2 |
  -
lthey are staslling because they know a large portion of Japan may be uninhabitable and where .... |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-24-11 08:16 PM |
#16 |
| -
This could very well be the case |
slay |
Mar-25-11 04:13 AM |
#44 |
| -
lead dust needs to be part of that, not ingots but dust like a dentist gown |
StarsInHerHair |
Mar-26-11 08:42 PM |
#109 |
| -
No way. If we drop a mk-82 nuclear bomb set to yield 250KTs on that plant |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 09:35 AM |
#58 |
| -
How much |
Aerows |
Mar-25-11 10:09 AM |
#61 |
| -
In tokyo sure.. |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 10:23 AM |
#64 |
| -
My B.S. is in Chemistry |
Aerows |
Mar-25-11 12:26 PM |
#74 |
| -
CS and Astronomy. |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 12:49 PM |
#76 |
| -
and the falout was all on NY state....LA was safe ..It was a good day when we didn't have rain in NY |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Mar-26-11 05:29 AM |
#92 |
| -
Oh, joy. "Tell the people of Japan to run!" |
aquart |
Mar-24-11 05:57 PM |
#3 |
| -
Run where? |
RC |
Mar-24-11 06:07 PM |
#4 |
| -
Not from what was measured there, but on their math... |
BrookBrew |
Mar-24-11 06:13 PM |
#5 |
| -
you should move there to comfort the People There |
fascisthunter |
Mar-24-11 06:34 PM |
#7 |
| -
This the 2nd post where I thought the same thing. nt |
nc4bo |
Mar-24-11 07:40 PM |
#12 |
| -
Obviously... |
Aerows |
Mar-25-11 10:13 AM |
#63 |
| -
Forgive me for saying so, but you come off sounding like a complete idiot |
psychopomp |
Mar-25-11 07:00 PM |
#91 |
| -
Japan is so lucky |
marions ghost |
Mar-24-11 07:06 PM |
#8 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-24-11 07:32 PM |
#10 |
| -
Well if the bombs |
marions ghost |
Mar-24-11 07:40 PM |
#11 |
| -
Well I will wait for the hiroshima levels of exposure |
BrookBrew |
Mar-24-11 07:44 PM |
#13 |
| -
Did you read the chart? |
Taft_Bathtub |
Mar-24-11 08:09 PM |
#15 |
| -
You are new here, so I will be gentle. Being exposed 24/7 does not compare |
thereismore |
Mar-24-11 08:46 PM |
#18 |
| -
Please, read the chart |
Taft_Bathtub |
Mar-24-11 09:00 PM |
#20 |
| -
OK, there you go. It's like getting 1 dental X-ray every fucking day for as long as you stay there. |
thereismore |
Mar-24-11 09:08 PM |
#23 |
| -
No doctor |
marions ghost |
Mar-24-11 11:22 PM |
#28 |
| -
jesus.... you don't wanna get it. |
fascisthunter |
Mar-25-11 09:20 AM |
#56 |
| -
Whoops, double post, nt |
Taft_Bathtub |
Mar-24-11 09:00 PM |
#21 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-24-11 10:23 PM |
#25 |
| -
It's OK |
marions ghost |
Mar-24-11 11:33 PM |
#29 |
| -
right |
marions ghost |
Mar-24-11 11:21 PM |
#27 |
| -
You don't get a dental x-ray 24-7. Radiation is cumulative ya know. NT |
Devil_Fish |
Mar-24-11 11:51 PM |
#32 |
| -
One chest x-ray can cause cancer if ur very unlucky. We stopped the tests, next stop the power plant |
grahamhgreen |
Mar-25-11 12:11 AM |
#35 |
| -
You know, you are the first person to get on my ignore list |
Aerows |
Mar-25-11 10:11 AM |
#62 |
| -
and they haven't raised the accident rating - why? |
jpak |
Mar-24-11 06:21 PM |
#6 |
| -
They're saving up the panic for one Mother-Of-All-Panics..... |
Junkdrawer |
Mar-24-11 07:07 PM |
#9 |
| -
I rather enjoyed reading the cleverly-written USA article including... |
hayu_lol |
Mar-24-11 08:05 PM |
#14 |
| -
Who's telling you to go to Mars? It reports radioactivity levels from 5 locations around the world. |
Octafish |
Mar-24-11 09:07 PM |
#22 |
| -
Not much news coming out |
marions ghost |
Mar-24-11 11:39 PM |
#30 |
| -
I Just come here and Have to Shake my Head |
fascisthunter |
Mar-25-11 09:27 AM |
#57 |
| -
Lets see. I am confused. Now I live with a Nuclear Med Engineer |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 10:37 AM |
#65 |
| -
I don't trust anything you have to say |
fascisthunter |
Mar-25-11 11:43 AM |
#71 |
| -
Be sure to buy a SHITTON of KI tabs. A lead line room, 3 pallets |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 01:23 PM |
#79 |
| -
The Japanese affected by this tragedy surely will appreciate your ridicule |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 04:32 PM |
#84 |
| -
Yep, I am not saying the bombs had no impact. They clearly did.. |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 04:38 PM |
#87 |
| -
My only ridicule is pointed to the fear mongers and the soap boxers |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 04:42 PM |
#88 |
| -
I don't see any fearmongers |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 04:56 PM |
#90 |
| -
No I find the end is neigh people funny |
BrookBrew |
Mar-26-11 01:20 PM |
#94 |
| -
studies estimate that Chernobyl caused between 200,000 and one million premature deaths |
reorg |
Mar-26-11 03:22 PM |
#97 |
| -
Talking it down... |
Prana69 |
Mar-24-11 08:43 PM |
#17 |
| -
Is Australia planning to nuke itself in the future -- or are they doing it now? |
defendandprotect |
Mar-24-11 09:18 PM |
#24 |
| -
Not nuclear weapons, but possibly nuclear power... |
Prana69 |
Mar-24-11 10:29 PM |
#26 |
| -
I hope Australians |
marions ghost |
Mar-24-11 11:44 PM |
#31 |
| -
Sad -- |
defendandprotect |
Mar-25-11 12:03 AM |
#33 |
| -
K&R....n/t |
unkachuck |
Mar-24-11 08:49 PM |
#19 |
| -
Somehow, we have to get the nukers to "put down the weapon". |
grahamhgreen |
Mar-25-11 12:07 AM |
#34 |
| -
From the original article: |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-25-11 12:32 AM |
#36 |
| -
the article alerts us of possible grave consequences of the disaster |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 12:56 AM |
#37 |
| -
I showed you the original. There are substantial differences between it & how it's reported in the |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-25-11 01:20 AM |
#38 |
| -
ok, see post #39 |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 02:15 AM |
#40 |
| -
i am questioning the accuracy of the reporting about what *this* report actually says. |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-25-11 03:17 AM |
#43 |
| -
see post #43, I dont see any contradictions |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 10:51 AM |
#68 |
| -
some corrections |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 02:13 AM |
#39 |
| -
if you speak german, i'll accept your translation over google's. however, i don't understand |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-25-11 04:56 AM |
#46 |
| -
It doesn't appear these numbers are taken from the ZAMG website |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 10:47 AM |
#66 |
| -
zamg is linked as the source of the estimates in articles about it: |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-25-11 12:20 PM |
#73 |
| -
Really, I have no idea what you are trying to do here |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 02:54 PM |
#80 |
| -
zamg, & the page i linked, have been linked as the source document |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-25-11 04:10 PM |
#82 |
| -
yawn, the page you linked is NOT the source document for the NS article |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 04:25 PM |
#83 |
| -
If there is some other report the new scientist article is based on, please link it. |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-25-11 04:35 PM |
#86 |
| -
the source for the article cited in the OP is the New Scientist |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 04:49 PM |
#89 |
| -
zamg is the source for the new scientist article. it's where the estimates & the analysis originate. |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-26-11 01:14 PM |
#93 |
| -
sigh, Dr. Wotawa from the ZAMG is the source cited by the New Scientist |
reorg |
Mar-26-11 02:26 PM |
#95 |
| -
zamg is the source for the analysis & extrapolations. wotawa is their employee |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-26-11 02:47 PM |
#96 |
| -
the page you linked is NOT the source for the New Scientist report |
reorg |
Mar-26-11 03:27 PM |
#98 |
| -
you can bluster all you like. the zamg report is the source for the new scientist |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-26-11 04:13 PM |
#99 |
| -
The New Scientist obviously talked to Dr Wotawa like any reporter would do |
reorg |
Mar-26-11 05:49 PM |
#101 |
| -
they didn't just "talk to" wotawa. the estimates are *from* wotawa & zamg. |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-26-11 05:53 PM |
#103 |
| -
So? |
reorg |
Mar-26-11 05:55 PM |
#104 |
| -
did you even read the updated versions? from the 25th |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-26-11 04:41 PM |
#100 |
| -
I already pointed this out in post #39 |
reorg |
Mar-26-11 05:51 PM |
#102 |
| -
there is nothing about foodstuffs in this link. |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-26-11 05:58 PM |
#105 |
| -
I provided the links in post #39 |
reorg |
Mar-26-11 06:07 PM |
#106 |
| -
i'm not talking about the brief from the 23rd, i'm talking about the update from the 25th. |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-26-11 06:09 PM |
#107 |
| -
okay, let's keep this thread kicked |
reorg |
Mar-26-11 06:27 PM |
#108 |
| -
K&R |
DeSwiss |
Mar-25-11 02:26 AM |
#41 |
| -
Tokyo is just 80 miles away. The world may be in for a huge shakeup before long. |
Kablooie |
Mar-25-11 02:36 AM |
#42 |
| -
80 miles, 170 miles, what does it matter? |
Hannah Bell |
Mar-25-11 04:37 AM |
#45 |
| -
Chernobyl affected 150,000k. That's a radius of about 240 miles. |
Kablooie |
Mar-25-11 12:11 PM |
#72 |
| -
Wow.. If the USAF right now dropped a B-61 thermonuclear weapon on that plant |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 09:43 AM |
#60 |
| -
Accumulated 24-Hour Radiation 30 Km Northwest of Fukushima Exeeds Annual Limit on Natural Dose |
Hissyspit |
Mar-25-11 07:53 AM |
#47 |
| -
What does that mean? |
grahamhgreen |
Mar-25-11 07:53 AM |
#48 |
| -
It means that getting cancer or getting radiation poison |
sakabatou |
Mar-25-11 07:53 AM |
#49 |
| -
I qonder how long before that exposure would lead to radiation sickness? |
grahamhgreen |
Mar-25-11 07:53 AM |
#50 |
| -
not radiation sickness, but increased rates of cancer, genetic defects, deformed babies etc. n/t |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 07:53 AM |
#52 |
| -
Lifetimes.. |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 09:39 AM |
#59 |
| -
I've seen that chart, but remember even one x-ray has a chance of giving you cancer. |
grahamhgreen |
Mar-25-11 12:34 PM |
#75 |
| -
And one drink can kill your liver |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 12:51 PM |
#77 |
| -
The idea is to reduce one's exposure to radiation to a minimum. |
grahamhgreen |
Mar-25-11 03:50 PM |
#81 |
| -
Yes of course. However there is a long way from this event to hiroshima |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 04:32 PM |
#85 |
| -
more details |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 07:53 AM |
#51 |
| -
Very confused language |
caraher |
Mar-25-11 07:53 AM |
#53 |
| -
yes, "natural" is a bad choice of words |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 07:53 AM |
#54 |
| -
k&r Thanks Octafish n/t |
Hotler |
Mar-25-11 08:07 AM |
#55 |
| -
Thanks Hannah for the remarks about the poor quality of the... |
hayu_lol |
Mar-25-11 10:48 AM |
#67 |
| -
the poor quality of Hannah's Google translation is obvious |
reorg |
Mar-25-11 10:59 AM |
#69 |
| -
thank you... |
fascisthunter |
Mar-25-11 11:42 AM |
#70 |
| -
Be sure to read "The Road" its a great tutorial |
BrookBrew |
Mar-25-11 12:59 PM |
#78 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread