You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: You presume "facts not yet evident" as well [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. You presume "facts not yet evident" as well
Edited on Tue Mar-22-11 10:35 AM by Missy Vixen
The NFL has lost every court case for the past several years. They were terrified of Judge Doty for good reason. I don't have a lot of info about the judge hearing the case on April 6, but I did find it interesting they're going in front of a female this time.

>Also there has been a dissident faction inside the NFLPA for some time.<

The "dissident faction" consists of Antonio Cromartie. If the "dissident faction" was so powerful, they would have been heard from long before now.

>This is not exactly working people up against the man either.<

Based on what? Perhaps you might explain. Is it because half the league makes under $1.9 million a year? The average career of a NFL player is three and a half seasons. MOST retire due to injury, while billionaire owners clean up year after year. The only injuries they have to worry about might be a paper cut.

NFL players are dealing with the same management mentality any other worker is - owners who believe that calling NFL players "partners" but not offering pertinent financial information is acceptable, owners who do not guarantee 100% of player salaries or health insurance after five years out of the league, owners who will cut or trade any player at any time if it improves their bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -NFL: No Legal Grounds to Halt Lockout Omaha Steve  Mar-21-11 05:51 PM   #0 
  - I will be pissed if we don't have football this year. I need my FF fix already.  no limit   Mar-21-11 05:59 PM   #1 
  - BS Fox News (Goodell) PR set the story first news cycle nonsense  underpants   Mar-21-11 06:07 PM   #2 
  - Millionaires versus Billionaires: Who cares?  FailureToCommunicate   Mar-21-11 06:26 PM   #3 
  - It's the NFL's attempt to bust the union  Missy Vixen   Mar-21-11 06:38 PM   #4 
  - At this point there is no NFLPA...they voluntarily disbanded  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-21-11 06:46 PM   #5 
  - Thanks for the update  Missy Vixen   Mar-21-11 07:43 PM   #14 
     - You presume facts not yet evident  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-21-11 10:05 PM   #17 
        - You presume "facts not yet evident" as well  Missy Vixen   Mar-22-11 10:25 AM   #20 
  - I support collective bargaining  SnakeEyes   Mar-21-11 06:52 PM   #6 
     - Nice to know you don't approve  Missy Vixen   Mar-21-11 07:44 PM   #15 
  - Anyone who supports the Unions...  LanternWaste   Mar-21-11 07:16 PM   #10 
  - +1 /nt  October   Mar-22-11 12:01 AM   #18 
  - B/c the millionaires are the workers who sacrifice their bodies---and this will be used  CrossChris   Mar-22-11 10:51 AM   #21 
  - Won't Hurt Me One Bit  Possumpoint   Mar-21-11 06:55 PM   #7 
  - We have a DUer with a daughter that pays for college with her income on football Sundays  Omaha Steve   Mar-21-11 09:00 PM   #16 
  - There's collective bargaining, and then their's collective bargaining. n/t  tcaudilllg   Mar-21-11 07:00 PM   #8 
  - "accusing the players of trying to manipulate the law." Isn't that what lawyers are supposed to do?  GodlessBiker   Mar-21-11 07:10 PM   #9 
  - Lost to everyone, it is our money they are fighting about  PuppyBismark   Mar-21-11 07:25 PM   #11 
  - In that case  christx30   Mar-21-11 07:35 PM   #13 
     - It's the main reason I don't have cable.  Skink   Mar-22-11 09:20 AM   #19 
  - What do they mean "no legal ground"?  Fool Count   Mar-21-11 07:30 PM   #12 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC