You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #22: K&R for more visibility. n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. K&R for more visibility. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Anthrax report casts doubt on scientific evidence in FBI case against Bruce Ivins RufusTFirefly  Feb-15-11 10:29 AM   #0 
  - We need a real 9-11 investigation. Who profited the most from the attacks?  grahamhgreen   Feb-15-11 10:46 AM   #1 
  - Off hand I would say Haliburton/Dick Cheney  Bandit   Feb-15-11 12:12 PM   #10 
     - The really creepy part for me is, I expect FBI with its history of political activity  EFerrari   Feb-15-11 01:17 PM   #15 
  - Whoever was behind the anthrax attacks must be very powerful.  jtrockville   Feb-15-11 11:17 AM   #2 
  - Some anthrax attack facts  RufusTFirefly   Feb-15-11 11:25 AM   #3 
  - Neocons blamed Iraq soon after attacks  Kingofalldems   Feb-15-11 11:33 AM   #4 
  - this WP article did not shed any light on other lines of research  northoftheborder   Feb-15-11 11:34 AM   #5 
  - Mueller told Leahy in an open session that the science would be conclusive.  EFerrari   Feb-15-11 01:00 PM   #13 
  - Strategy of Tension  RufusTFirefly   Feb-15-11 11:39 AM   #6 
  - RW attack conspiracy to drive war and the patriot act  on point   Feb-15-11 11:43 AM   #7 
  - smack is not the word for it  Marblehead   Feb-15-11 11:52 AM   #9 
  - The messages accompanying the anthrax letters....  JohnyCanuck   Feb-15-11 01:20 PM   #16 
  - Sure, pin it on the dead guy.  blackspade   Feb-15-11 11:48 AM   #8 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Feb-15-11 12:20 PM   #11 
  - Mueller knew he was lying when he told Pat Leahy the science would prove the case  EFerrari   Feb-15-11 12:48 PM   #12 
  - I doubt we'll ever hear the truth about that. nt  raccoon   Feb-15-11 01:01 PM   #14 
  - We may never hear it but I think we know it. nt  virtus_contagiosa   Feb-15-11 01:43 PM   #18 
  - Lead scientist on FBI Ivins case: "I never felt that science alone would solve this investigation."  EFerrari   Feb-15-11 01:42 PM   #17 
  - Special Prosecutor needed in this case  Kingofalldems   Feb-15-11 01:46 PM   #19 
  - Funny, NPR seems to leave the opposite sense of that headline.  Festivito   Feb-15-11 08:13 PM   #20 
  - This is Dr. Meryl Nass's blog post. I guess NPR didn't get to her yet, lol.  EFerrari   Feb-15-11 09:39 PM   #21 
     - It's also ironic that this investigation  newspeak   Feb-16-11 09:54 AM   #23 
  - K&R for more visibility. n/t  Mnemosyne    Feb-16-11 09:02 AM   #22 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC