You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: Which doesn't give her or anyone the right to define public policy. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-11 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
47. Which doesn't give her or anyone the right to define public policy.
Personal tragedy does not make you an expert in what is right. Invoking the shooting of a family member to justify a crusade against guns and gun owners is nothing but writ small of the principle behind invoking 9/11 to justify endless wars. Public policy has to be based on SCIENTIFIC understanding, not irrational emotional hyperbole. In this case, we tried magazine capacity limits before, 1994 to 2004, and the Department of Justice tells us that there is absolutely no evidence that it reduced crime in any way.

Remember Virginia Tech? The shooter there used 10-round magazines which would be legal under this bill, and he managed to kill far more people than Jared Loughner did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Rep. McCarthy Intros Bill to Ban High-Capacity Ammo Clips onehandle  Jan-18-11 09:20 PM   #0 
  - 10 rounds good, 11 rounds bad  derby378   Jan-18-11 09:28 PM   #1 
  - I thought Loughner's gun had 31 rounds?  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-18-11 09:32 PM   #2 
  - From McCarthy's press release  derby378   Jan-18-11 09:40 PM   #5 
     - Well I don't think anyone needs 31 rounds  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-18-11 09:43 PM   #7 
     - Well, uh...  derby378   Jan-18-11 09:45 PM   #9 
        - If I do, well, I've got even bigger problems  AlbertCat   Jan-18-11 10:06 PM   #19 
           - The thing is....  FarLeftFist   Jan-18-11 10:46 PM   #35 
           - Tell that to the guy..  X_Digger   Jan-18-11 11:02 PM   #37 
              - True but...  FarLeftFist   Jan-18-11 11:45 PM   #44 
                 - Your argument is the BEST way to dismatle the Constitution  FreakinDJ   Jan-19-11 01:04 AM   #49 
                 - why are you using the exact argument as the right?  StarsInHerHair   Jan-20-11 12:13 AM   #95 
                    - Oh - very intelligent rebuttal there  FreakinDJ   Jan-20-11 07:31 AM   #96 
                 - And it may just piss them off..  X_Digger   Jan-19-11 10:24 AM   #72 
                 - It appears you are more then willing  Riftaxe   Jan-19-11 11:40 AM   #77 
                 - Another great argument for getting rid of guns entirely -- !!  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 10:44 PM   #91 
           - This is apparently an emotional issue for you. I understand.  The Doctor.   Jan-18-11 11:51 PM   #45 
           - When St Gun enters the room, logic always seems to leave.  sellitman   Jan-19-11 06:54 AM   #58 
           - Concrete limits based on what?  derby378   Jan-19-11 04:36 PM   #81 
     - Forgetting bullets for a moment, what about concerns for life?  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 10:43 PM   #90 
  - Oh, so we are 'Strict Constitutionalists' now?  onehandle   Jan-18-11 09:34 PM   #3 
  - "Intellectual?" no, common sense yes  demosincebirth   Jan-18-11 09:39 PM   #4 
  - So, your "common sense" tells you criminals will give a $%#t about this law?  Tejas   Jan-18-11 09:44 PM   #8 
     - It's a start .... and given the rising right wing violence, it's a necessity ....  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 09:50 PM   #12 
     - And there we strike upon a serious problem.  The Doctor.   Jan-19-11 12:06 AM   #46 
        - Exactly  customerserviceguy   Jan-19-11 06:16 AM   #55 
           - McCarthy, not Maloney  derby378   Jan-19-11 04:39 PM   #82 
     - So, your "common sense" tells you criminals will give a $%#t about this law?  AlbertCat   Jan-18-11 10:11 PM   #21 
     - I know a couple of "intellectuals" who have a hard time tying their shoe laces  demosincebirth   Jan-20-11 02:34 PM   #102 
  - ...but "intellectually" the Supremes could justify W and guns for everyone?  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 09:49 PM   #11 
  - How long was the precedent for PLESSY V. FERGUSON?  derby378   Jan-18-11 09:52 PM   #15 
     - Was there an opening clause which cited a "well-regulated militia" in Plessy?  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 09:56 PM   #17 
        - Crime, voilent and otherwise are at historic lows down about half from the early 1970's.  davepc   Jan-19-11 06:21 AM   #56 
           - GOPs/NRA will continue to push for selling more guns --  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 11:00 AM   #76 
  - lines have to be drawn somewhere  harmonicon   Jan-18-11 10:13 PM   #22 
     - ICBM?  gejohnston   Jan-18-11 10:54 PM   #36 
        - It's not a straw man, but the end of a logical progression.  harmonicon   Jan-18-11 11:31 PM   #41 
           - And who decides the criteria by which Congress draws those lines?  derby378   Jan-19-11 04:42 PM   #83 
              - Criteria should certainly not be what's good for GOPs/NRA but what's good for America ....  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 10:47 PM   #92 
              - simple answer again: we do.  harmonicon   Jan-20-11 09:50 AM   #99 
  - I've seen this before......  aikoaiko   Jan-18-11 09:42 PM   #6 
  - Good for her -- Canada has 7 million guns in 10 million homes and only 200 deaths by gun  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 09:46 PM   #10 
  - Personally, I tend to favor mandated training...  derby378   Jan-18-11 09:51 PM   #13 
  - You don't need a permit for "freedom of speech" -- you need permits to protest now ....  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 09:59 PM   #18 
     - Are you saying "free-speech zones" are a good thing?  derby378   Jan-19-11 04:30 PM   #80 
        - I'm saying that free speech is now based on $$ if you read the latest right wing  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 10:12 PM   #85 
  - however  gejohnston   Jan-18-11 11:30 PM   #40 
  - Presented it as an example of sanity ...which we could use here --  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 10:14 PM   #86 
  - post script  gejohnston   Jan-18-11 11:38 PM   #42 
  - Canada is generally sane -- America is not -- that's the comparison....  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 10:19 PM   #87 
  - Annnnnd....  pipoman   Jan-19-11 12:58 AM   #48 
  - why should your ex-spouse have that much of a say?  bossy22   Jan-19-11 09:00 AM   #64 
     - Evidently, you're unaware of domestic violence and men shooting women after  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 10:21 PM   #88 
  - if she doesn't know the difference between a clip and a magazine  naaman fletcher   Jan-18-11 09:52 PM   #14 
  - McCarthy knows the difference between a dead husband and a wounded son.. by gunman ...  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 09:53 PM   #16 
  - Sure,  naaman fletcher   Jan-18-11 10:19 PM   #24 
  - Re-read your message ....  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 10:26 PM   #26 
     - meant to say "if"  naaman fletcher   Jan-18-11 10:31 PM   #29 
        - So you made a mistake which made a huge difference in meaning of your post ...  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 10:44 PM   #34 
           - i made a typo..  naaman fletcher   Jan-18-11 11:39 PM   #43 
              - I know what you did - I brought it to your attention ... McCarthy has dyslexia...  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 08:35 AM   #59 
  - Which doesn't give her or anyone the right to define public policy.  TheWraith   Jan-19-11 12:51 AM   #47 
  - A "Crusade" against guns and gun owners .... ?  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 08:41 AM   #60 
  - If she was half as anxious to  pipoman   Jan-19-11 01:14 AM   #50 
  - They weren't armed  Ter   Jan-19-11 11:56 PM   #94 
  - then she has no business legislating on the subject.  AlbertCat   Jan-18-11 10:18 PM   #23 
  - She has had endless hearings over her career,  naaman fletcher   Jan-18-11 10:22 PM   #25 
     - Or you have an GOP/NRA interpretation of what she is saying ... ?  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 10:29 PM   #27 
        - nope.  naaman fletcher   Jan-18-11 10:30 PM   #28 
           - You mean like the Patriot Act ... ?  defendandprotect   Jan-18-11 10:35 PM   #30 
           - I think you made the previous poster's point for him..  X_Digger   Jan-18-11 10:41 PM   #32 
           - any time the gun crowd talks about emotion  HankyDubs   Jan-19-11 03:20 AM   #52 
              - I'm not the one who brought up emotion  naaman fletcher   Jan-19-11 06:27 AM   #57 
              - GOPs/NRA "emotions" are based on aggression, violence, fearmongering ....  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 08:51 AM   #61 
              - +1000% -- Where would the entire right wing be without appeals to FEAR -- ??  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 08:53 AM   #62 
  - For her sake  gejohnston   Jan-18-11 11:19 PM   #39 
     - For your sake --  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 08:57 AM   #63 
  - K&R for actual political leadership on the left. n/t  intheflow   Jan-18-11 10:08 PM   #20 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-18-11 10:36 PM   #31 
  - This bill is going nowhere  Upton   Jan-18-11 10:43 PM   #33 
  - I don't have a problem with this feel-good bill.  Dappleganger   Jan-18-11 11:07 PM   #38 
  - because your government is so violent against people,I shudder if they ban you from having firearms  stockholmer   Jan-19-11 01:15 AM   #51 
  - It is not like that where I live, Mr. Fear Monger ... eom  Kolesar   Jan-19-11 05:25 AM   #54 
  - Actually gun dealers and gun owners should love this.  zogofzorkon   Jan-19-11 04:48 AM   #53 
  - 100% for this...No real reason anybody needs that many rounds loaded  snooper2   Jan-19-11 09:11 AM   #65 
  - so why do we give police handguns with 15 round magazines?  bossy22   Jan-19-11 09:46 AM   #66 
     - Why do we give Navy pilots missles?  snooper2   Jan-19-11 09:55 AM   #67 
        - If individual police officers duties included shooting down planes,  benEzra   Jan-19-11 10:11 AM   #70 
        - they are not apples and oranges  bossy22   Jan-19-11 10:17 AM   #71 
        - Its not really... police encounter the same criminals victimizing regular folks.  aikoaiko   Jan-19-11 10:59 AM   #75 
  - *yawn* What a waste of time and resources.  cleanhippie   Jan-19-11 10:09 AM   #68 
  - Indeed...  Imajika   Jan-19-11 10:25 AM   #73 
     - Yup. It sucks because there ARE so many things that need attention.  cleanhippie   Jan-19-11 10:33 AM   #74 
  - She's a classic "loose cannon" for our party  slackmaster   Jan-19-11 10:11 AM   #69 
  - Accomplishing nothing but driving voters to the other side.  cleanhippie   Jan-19-11 01:31 PM   #78 
  - Ambulance chasing.  Tejas   Jan-19-11 03:41 PM   #79 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-19-11 08:13 PM   #84 
  - Let's see if America can be sane for a change?  defendandprotect   Jan-19-11 10:40 PM   #89 
  - So what about the people who buy up all of the high-capacity clips before this law is enacted?  truthisfreedom   Jan-19-11 11:33 PM   #93 
  - So she wants people to hand load their 10+ round magazines?  davepc   Jan-20-11 07:36 AM   #97 
  - Why are police (and retired police) exempted from this?  Hoopla Phil   Jan-20-11 09:33 AM   #98 
  - Police are exempt from all gun control legislation.  davepc   Jan-20-11 10:46 AM   #100 
  - Because gun ban proponents are all authoritarians at their core  slackmaster   Jan-20-11 10:50 AM   #101 
  - The Op has a misleading title.  beevul   Jan-20-11 07:27 PM   #103 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC