You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #26: Yeah, so much for the cancer patient who (if the mandate and therefore the pre-existing condition [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Yeah, so much for the cancer patient who (if the mandate and therefore the pre-existing condition
clause are removed) will go back to having to pay 20 times as much as a healthy person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Administration Is Bracing for Setbacks to Health Law BrentWil  Nov-26-10 04:54 PM   #0 
  - Iow, no foresight.  RUMMYisFROSTED   Nov-26-10 05:07 PM   #1 
  - -puke- -puke- -puke- ad infinitum.  BrklynLiberal   Nov-26-10 05:18 PM   #2 
  - If this were a republican issue, the framing would be different...  gtar100   Nov-27-10 02:30 AM   #49 
     - VERY well said!  BrklynLiberal   Nov-27-10 08:54 AM   #56 
     - BINGO!  No Elephants   Nov-27-10 11:24 AM   #59 
  - WH signals they will hand over the lunch money to the bullies...again..n/t  kickysnana   Nov-26-10 05:24 PM   #3 
  - Yep. n/t  pleah   Nov-26-10 05:36 PM   #5 
  - Single payer... nt  4dsc   Nov-26-10 05:25 PM   #4 
  - Way ahead of you  rocktivity   Nov-26-10 06:43 PM   #8 
  - National health service. "Study: UK Only Rich Nation With Wide Access To Low Cost Health Care"  pampango   Nov-27-10 05:41 AM   #51 
  - This is what happens when you compromise... they keep digging for more.  Fearless   Nov-26-10 05:57 PM   #6 
  - No Shit  Dinger   Nov-26-10 07:18 PM   #10 
  - Health Care Lawsuit  italiangirl   Nov-26-10 09:52 PM   #42 
  - It is the old "give 'em a finger and they want the whole hand" concept.  BrklynLiberal   Nov-27-10 08:55 AM   #57 
  - Dang, who could have predicted this? nt  bemildred   Nov-26-10 06:17 PM   #7 
  - Glenn Beckster.....  EarthFirster   Nov-26-10 07:40 PM   #17 
  - He has a lot of company in that, me for example. nt  bemildred   Nov-26-10 07:51 PM   #21 
  - ANYONE  Skittles   Nov-26-10 07:55 PM   #23 
  - Any 1st year law student n/t  24601   Nov-27-10 06:47 AM   #52 
  - SCOTUS will uphold that part---because it means more money for GOP SuperPacs.  McCamy Taylor   Nov-26-10 07:11 PM   #9 
  - Right. They'll just repeal the parts  Jackpine Radical   Nov-26-10 07:22 PM   #11 
     - The corrupted Supreme Court will throw out everything except the mandates  Joe Bacon   Nov-27-10 12:51 AM   #46 
  - Take his efn insurance away.  LiberalFighter   Nov-26-10 07:25 PM   #12 
  - +1. nt  SammyWinstonJack   Nov-26-10 07:28 PM   #13 
  - Have you ASKED your DOCTOR if he will stick around?  EarthFirster   Nov-26-10 07:32 PM   #14 
     - As typical, trolls don't have a clue about the facts.  LiberalFighter   Nov-26-10 07:42 PM   #18 
     - I don't need to talk to Eastern-Blockers.  JDPriestly   Nov-26-10 08:56 PM   #37 
     - Private insurance is precisely the problem  eridani   Nov-27-10 05:18 PM   #74 
     - Yeah, Socialism sucks so badly that everyday thousands of  dflprincess   Nov-26-10 09:28 PM   #39 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-27-10 02:14 AM   #48 
     - My husband is a family doctor  Mojorabbit   Nov-26-10 10:20 PM   #43 
     - Pretty freeperish, but given how this place has gone green party wild I don't really care.  ChimpersMcSmirkers   Nov-27-10 04:09 AM   #50 
     - The Green Party advocates seizing ownership of the means of production?  No Elephants   Nov-27-10 11:54 AM   #65 
     - If you had had the experience I had with 'Third World Doctors'  COLGATE4   Nov-27-10 09:52 AM   #58 
  - Casting HCR as another welfare program is a sure losing strategy n/t  24601   Nov-27-10 06:49 AM   #54 
     - I'm putting the focus on crap they approve that should be considered socialist  LiberalFighter   Nov-27-10 11:37 AM   #63 
  - Admittedly, I've always had a big problem with this part of the law  AllyCat   Nov-26-10 07:32 PM   #15 
  - Competition across state lines...  EarthFirster   Nov-26-10 07:38 PM   #16 
  - There actually are Auto Insurance equivalents to Single Payer Health Insurance  Kennah   Nov-26-10 07:49 PM   #20 
  - it would be fine IF a PUBLIC OPTION was offered  Skittles   Nov-26-10 07:57 PM   #24 
     - Agree  lovuian   Nov-26-10 08:05 PM   #27 
        - it is what made this so-called "health care reform" (PLEASE) a piece of GARBAGE  Skittles   Nov-26-10 08:08 PM   #30 
  - one point  whathappened   Nov-26-10 08:13 PM   #32 
  - That's true. Every time a child of mine turned 18, GEICO called me  BlueCaliDem   Nov-26-10 08:32 PM   #33 
  - not if the teenager does not drive.  Little Star   Nov-26-10 08:35 PM   #34 
  - But the law only requires you buy insurance to protect other drivers  dflprincess   Nov-26-10 09:31 PM   #40 
  - If you can afford health insurance and don't buy it, you are either  JDPriestly   Nov-26-10 09:13 PM   #38 
  - 133% or 400% of poverty level sounds like a lot until you do the math and find out  dflprincess   Nov-26-10 09:38 PM   #41 
  - The whole thing causes me unfathomable frustration and anxiety...  InkAddict   Nov-27-10 12:47 PM   #70 
  - The definition of "afford" is different for most Americans, especially when  AllyCat   Nov-28-10 12:37 AM   #75 
  - Sick or healthy doesn't matter. Either you are poor enough to  No Elephants   Nov-27-10 11:36 AM   #62 
  - I'm not the least bit upset about this  Smashcut   Nov-26-10 07:47 PM   #19 
  - Yeah, so much for the cancer patient who (if the mandate and therefore the pre-existing condition  BzaDem   Nov-26-10 08:04 PM   #26 
     - It's the rare cancer patient who can afford the pre-existing condition pool.  Vinca   Nov-27-10 06:49 AM   #53 
     - Great argument--for single payer.  No Elephants   Nov-27-10 12:01 PM   #67 
  - Politics  ProSense   Nov-26-10 07:53 PM   #22 
  - The requirement should be disallowed.  MrTriumph   Nov-26-10 08:02 PM   #25 
     - In that case, the pre-existing condition clause would have to be disallowed too. n/t  BzaDem   Nov-26-10 08:05 PM   #28 
        - Why? nt  Mojorabbit   Nov-26-10 10:22 PM   #44 
  - I'm sure that we are going to see how Active, these Activist Judges will be...  SoapBox   Nov-26-10 08:07 PM   #29 
  - OK, someone correct me if I'm wrong here...  Rozlee   Nov-26-10 08:11 PM   #31 
  - You could do the same thing with the mandate in place.  girl gone mad   Nov-27-10 03:43 PM   #72 
  - Once again, we see why the Senate is worthless:  laughingliberal   Nov-26-10 08:37 PM   #35 
  - OMA (Oversight, my ass.)  No Elephants   Nov-27-10 11:43 AM   #64 
  - We can only hope.  Milo_Bloom   Nov-26-10 08:55 PM   #36 
  - Isn't that the only part of HCR that republicans and private health insurers like?  applegrove   Nov-26-10 11:33 PM   #45 
  - Yes. It's too bad the Senate failed to put a severability clause in their bill (see #35)  laughingliberal   Nov-27-10 01:30 AM   #47 
     - Yes, but thankfully we still have Harry so he can continue this stellar  24601   Nov-27-10 06:57 AM   #55 
        - And the POTUS so when Harry tries to do something like a Medicare buy in, the CofS can go over...  laughingliberal   Nov-27-10 12:00 PM   #66 
  - awesome  jamiefoxer   Nov-27-10 11:30 AM   #60 
  - The unprincipled apologists are unquestionably for this  IRemember   Nov-27-10 11:32 AM   #61 
  - Bracing for setbacks???  bvar22   Nov-27-10 12:11 PM   #68 
  - Yes. Part of the 'new' approach to be more 'bidness' friendly. nt  laughingliberal   Nov-27-10 02:01 PM   #71 
  - They should have combined Medicare, Medicaid as a Public Option  ProudDad   Nov-27-10 12:34 PM   #69 
  - but wait! crappy as the hc"r" bill was.....  tomp   Nov-27-10 03:59 PM   #73 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC