diane in sf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-22-10 06:03 AM
Response to Original message |
| 32. Bill Wattenburg is a dummy who thinks radiation doesn't harm people |
| -Scientists say they have solution to TSA scanner objections |
truthisfreedom |
Nov-21-10 11:41 PM |
#0 |
 -
would not "fix" the unnecesary pat downs |
Whoa_Nelly |
Nov-21-10 11:43 PM |
#1 |
| -
A cheaper fix would be to unplug the damn things. |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-21-10 11:43 PM |
#2 |
 -
lol |
avaistheone1 |
Nov-22-10 02:11 AM |
#18 |
 -
Wish there was a like button for replies. |
Atypical Liberal |
Nov-22-10 08:17 AM |
#35 |
| -
Doesn't solve the problem of radiation exposure, especially |
marybourg |
Nov-21-10 11:44 PM |
#3 |
| -
Exactly |
Hawkowl |
Nov-22-10 12:14 AM |
#10 |
| -
Have a happy tumor then........ |
blackbart99 |
Nov-22-10 05:03 AM |
#26 |
| -
Doesn't solve the problem of radiation exposure, especially |
james0tucson |
Nov-22-10 08:33 AM |
#37 |
| -
hey james0tucson |
Kali |
Nov-22-10 09:25 AM |
#40 |
| -
All of this should have been done before they bought and installed |
LisaL |
Nov-21-10 11:45 PM |
#4 |
| -
This is key |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-21-10 11:53 PM |
#5 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-22-10 12:07 AM |
#7 |
| -
I have a better solution |
notesdev |
Nov-22-10 12:07 AM |
#6 |
| -
Unfortunately.. |
katnapped |
Nov-22-10 10:42 AM |
#45 |
| -
Some of us . . . |
Richard D |
Nov-22-10 12:07 AM |
#8 |
| -
If you're worried about radiation, *DON'T FLY*. |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 12:43 AM |
#12 |
| -
Naked body scanners may be dangerous: scientists |
avaistheone1 |
Nov-22-10 02:10 AM |
#17 |
| -
Another concern with body scanners-who is going to make |
LisaL |
Nov-22-10 02:19 AM |
#19 |
| -
Good point. |
avaistheone1 |
Nov-22-10 02:31 AM |
#20 |
| -
You're bracketed by *Ignored* posts, but he has valid points. |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 05:01 AM |
#25 |
| -
Most discussions of this sort are brushed aside with a "Trust us, citizen" from the TSA. |
Pholus |
Nov-22-10 06:00 AM |
#31 |
| -
They claimed nuclear tests were no big deal |
daleo |
Nov-22-10 11:06 PM |
#60 |
| -
Probability of getting cancer from scan = Probability of dying from terrorist = negligible. |
Pholus |
Nov-22-10 04:19 AM |
#22 |
| -
I don't think so. |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 05:19 AM |
#27 |
| -
IQ test? Nawwww. I believe TSA just doesn't pass Sagan's BS detection toolkit. |
Pholus |
Nov-22-10 05:51 AM |
#29 |
| -
TSA has actually provided numbers, as have others. |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 04:46 PM |
#52 |
| -
Tobacco companies used to provide numbers too |
daleo |
Nov-22-10 11:09 PM |
#61 |
| -
Congratulations boppers, your link confirms my original statement. |
Pholus |
Nov-23-10 05:01 AM |
#63 |
| -
+1000 |
ProudDad |
Nov-22-10 10:50 AM |
#48 |
| -
I have to fly for work and I don't want to get 10 xrays per flight from CastScope |
CreekDog |
Nov-22-10 07:30 AM |
#34 |
| -
If you're worried about radiation, *DON'T FLY*. |
james0tucson |
Nov-22-10 08:31 AM |
#36 |
| -
You don't think flight radiation is ionizing? |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 04:47 PM |
#53 |
| -
Some more info...... |
catchnrelease |
Nov-22-10 08:58 PM |
#58 |
| -
The POINT is: You're exposed no matter what but NEEDLESS exposure is a waste. |
Pholus |
Nov-23-10 05:06 AM |
#64 |
| -
Yeah, it's def better to get a double dose. |
Doremus |
Nov-22-10 09:52 AM |
#42 |
| -
For it to be "double", you'd have to be on such a short flight you might as well drive. |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 04:58 PM |
#56 |
| -
I don't think it's a valid comparison |
daleo |
Nov-22-10 11:03 PM |
#59 |
| -
How does this fix the health issue problems? |
Matariki |
Nov-22-10 12:13 AM |
#9 |
| -
The fourth sort off |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-22-10 12:44 AM |
#13 |
| -
The fourth sort off |
james0tucson |
Nov-22-10 08:40 AM |
#39 |
| -
They don't have to use the image as evidence. If they see-- |
Moonwalk |
Nov-22-10 09:47 AM |
#41 |
| -
Now you are entering into chain of evidence |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-22-10 02:38 PM |
#51 |
| -
I'm with you. |
sofa king |
Nov-22-10 05:54 PM |
#57 |
| -
How does this fix the health issue problems? |
james0tucson |
Nov-22-10 08:38 AM |
#38 |
| -
Oh thank God. I thought it involved radiation and mutants. |
Safetykitten |
Nov-22-10 12:35 AM |
#11 |
| -
I'm amazed at how many Americans think their image would be attractive in any way. |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 12:47 AM |
#14 |
| -
WTF does it have to do with americans thinking their image |
LisaL |
Nov-22-10 01:16 AM |
#15 |
| -
From the OP: "for their own private porno pleasure" |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 01:19 AM |
#16 |
| -
Well, my image IS pleasurable to look at. Got another pro-grope argument? |
Pholus |
Nov-22-10 04:24 AM |
#23 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-22-10 04:53 AM |
#24 |
| -
That was sarcasm. Don't they test for that in IQ test school? |
Pholus |
Nov-22-10 05:54 AM |
#30 |
| -
since when was porno restricted to "pleasurable to look at in any way, shape or form" |
DrDan |
Nov-22-10 05:45 AM |
#28 |
| -
Here, have a definition: |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 04:51 PM |
#55 |
| -
Some people especially LIKE fat people. n/t |
Ian David |
Nov-22-10 06:19 AM |
#33 |
| -
LOL, point taken. |
boppers |
Nov-22-10 04:48 PM |
#54 |
| -
... |
tomm2thumbs |
Nov-22-10 03:14 AM |
#21 |
| -
Bill Wattenburg is a dummy who thinks radiation doesn't harm people |
diane in sf |
Nov-22-10 06:03 AM |
#32 |
| -
Does it stop the radiation? No? Then it's not a fix. nt |
valerief |
Nov-22-10 09:55 AM |
#43 |
| -
The DHS budget for 2010 |
sulphurdunn |
Nov-22-10 10:18 AM |
#44 |
| -
What about the radiation risk!! This is why I would refuse! |
goforit |
Nov-22-10 10:47 AM |
#46 |
| -
"People" like chertoff and napolitano |
ProudDad |
Nov-22-10 10:49 AM |
#47 |
| -
This does nothing about the more egrigious part of the new fascist policies |
ProudDad |
Nov-22-10 10:51 AM |
#49 |
| -
It's the radiation and the violation of the 4th amendment, people in this country are clueless. |
sarcasmo |
Nov-22-10 11:02 AM |
#50 |
| -
When have the courts determined that this is a 4th Amendment |
24601 |
Nov-24-10 07:14 AM |
#68 |
| -
Still doesnt "fix" the skin cancer danger |
SoCalDemGrrl |
Nov-23-10 12:29 AM |
#62 |
| -
The current images are hardly "titillating" or "exciting". |
johnaries |
Nov-23-10 02:45 PM |
#65 |
| -
Actually, as shown on the TSA blog, the TSA repeatedly refuses to show CURRENT pictures |
Pholus |
Nov-23-10 04:31 PM |
#66 |
| -
wouldn't fix the radiation issue n/t |
TorchTheWitch |
Nov-24-10 02:57 AM |
#67 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread