tomhayes
(476 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-13-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Well, what's the law on punching missionaries?? |
| -State court declares (Roseville, Calif.) Galleria's speech rules unconstitutional |
Newsjock |
Aug-13-10 02:38 PM |
#0 |
 -
Well, what's the law on punching missionaries?? |
tomhayes |
Aug-13-10 02:49 PM |
#1 |
  -
that's called assault |
melm00se |
Aug-15-10 04:44 AM |
#35 |
| -
wonder if they could require him to get a permit |
davidinalameda |
Aug-13-10 02:52 PM |
#2 |
| -
I thought that the laws were that any owner of private property |
zbdent |
Aug-13-10 02:54 PM |
#4 |
| -
They want the public to come spend |
izquierdista |
Aug-13-10 03:28 PM |
#14 |
| -
This area is getting fuzzier and fuzzier as the line between 'public spaces' and 'private property' |
X_Digger |
Aug-13-10 04:25 PM |
#24 |
| -
Nope, Cantwell v Connecticut |
X_Digger |
Aug-13-10 04:17 PM |
#20 |
| -
I'm going to argue something |
davidinalameda |
Aug-13-10 06:59 PM |
#30 |
| -
If it's protected speech, yes. |
X_Digger |
Aug-13-10 07:36 PM |
#32 |
| -
ah, but when a lefty is arrested for wearing a T-shirt in a mall where he/she purchased |
zbdent |
Aug-13-10 02:52 PM |
#3 |
| -
I remember when malls were doing that to people in dem t-shirts. |
ThomCat |
Aug-13-10 03:21 PM |
#9 |
| -
actually, if I recall the right case, |
zbdent |
Aug-14-10 07:29 PM |
#34 |
| -
Seems like normal trespass and loitering laws would be enough. |
jobycom |
Aug-13-10 02:55 PM |
#5 |
| -
Well, it's not a "law" but a regulation of the mall. |
X_Digger |
Aug-13-10 04:29 PM |
#25 |
| -
Closer to laws allowing property owners to refuse to allow petitioners |
haele |
Aug-13-10 03:13 PM |
#6 |
| -
That would be a fascinating test case! |
StatGirl |
Aug-13-10 04:21 PM |
#22 |
| -
churches are allow to discriminate per membership |
davidinalameda |
Aug-13-10 07:01 PM |
#31 |
| -
CA (and NJ) have ruled that malls are fair game.. |
X_Digger |
Aug-13-10 04:38 PM |
#27 |
| -
By those rules you can't even ask where the restroom is. |
Downwinder |
Aug-13-10 03:18 PM |
#7 |
| -
C'mon everyone, stop dancing around this |
thelordofhell |
Aug-13-10 03:20 PM |
#8 |
| -
Very true. |
ThomCat |
Aug-13-10 03:22 PM |
#10 |
| -
Panhandling has (and deserves) no protection on private property. |
Lance_Boyle |
Aug-13-10 03:24 PM |
#13 |
| -
yes... those homeless bums are so inconvenient |
fascisthunter |
Aug-13-10 04:04 PM |
#17 |
| -
It's not inconvenience, it's harassment, and illegal. |
Lance_Boyle |
Aug-13-10 04:05 PM |
#18 |
| -
you can make up all the hypotheticals you want but I know when somebody |
fascisthunter |
Aug-13-10 04:18 PM |
#21 |
| -
So harassment is OK as long as the harasser is poor. Gotcha. |
Lance_Boyle |
Aug-13-10 04:24 PM |
#23 |
| -
don't want to be "harrassed"? Then do something about it, like... |
fascisthunter |
Aug-13-10 04:31 PM |
#26 |
| -
I pity you |
thelordofhell |
Aug-13-10 04:09 PM |
#19 |
| -
panhandling is the last ditch, bottom line thing to do |
ThomCat |
Aug-15-10 10:49 AM |
#37 |
| -
If someone tries to talk to me unsolicited about religion, I just start talking about sex. n/t |
Ian David |
Aug-13-10 03:22 PM |
#11 |
| -
Snatchko? Really? |
Lance_Boyle |
Aug-13-10 03:23 PM |
#12 |
| -
So, wait, what if the pastor had been asking about sex instead?... |
Moonwalk |
Aug-13-10 03:42 PM |
#15 |
| -
Honest to Dog the jokes write themselves |
HillWilliam |
Aug-13-10 06:30 PM |
#29 |
| -
If only that store employee had carried a gun. |
greiner3 |
Aug-13-10 04:03 PM |
#16 |
| -
Link to the decision.. |
X_Digger |
Aug-13-10 04:43 PM |
#28 |
| -
If he makes a living at this |
Turbineguy |
Aug-14-10 05:59 AM |
#33 |
| -
I hope that means that we can wear any T-shirt we like in there, and |
annabanana |
Aug-15-10 04:55 AM |
#36 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread