D-Lee
(457 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-12-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Lucky for teenage girls living where there are statutory rape laws ... |
|
If a 17 year old girl had 5 children, she would have started at around 12 ...
WHAT are you recommending?
(Geesh!)
|
| -Gilroy police: Canadian military man rode 3,000 miles to have sex with teen girl |
alp227 |
Apr-12-10 05:29 PM |
#0 |
 -
Seriously? |
XemaSab |
Apr-12-10 05:31 PM |
#1 |
 -
Lucky for teenage girls living where there are statutory rape laws ... |
D-Lee |
Apr-12-10 05:44 PM |
#2 |
| -
imo, 17 is ridiculously old for stat rape laws |
paulsby |
Apr-12-10 05:56 PM |
#4 |
| -
"Bitch set me up" n/t |
24601 |
Apr-12-10 10:36 PM |
#39 |
 -
lol nt |
paulsby |
Apr-12-10 11:05 PM |
#42 |
| -
Canada's was recently raised to 16. |
JBoy |
Apr-13-10 09:18 AM |
#74 |
| -
thank you |
paulsby |
Apr-13-10 12:24 PM |
#96 |
| -
That's nuts - you could legally have sex with a 17yo, but go to jail for asking her |
BR_Parkway |
Apr-13-10 12:06 PM |
#95 |
| -
not in california |
paulsby |
Apr-13-10 12:27 PM |
#97 |
| -
The Older I Get, The More I Think That Any Man Who'd Ride 3k Miles To Get In My Pants |
NashVegas |
Apr-13-10 01:47 PM |
#111 |
| -
I'm saying that it weakens the meaning of pedophilia |
XemaSab |
Apr-12-10 05:56 PM |
#5 |
| -
I agree 17 year olds may make poor decision but know what they are doing. |
bamacrat |
Apr-12-10 06:57 PM |
#12 |
| -
A line has to be drawn somewhere. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-12-10 09:22 PM |
#21 |
| -
A 17 yr old is not a child. This sounds more like Dad or Mom freaking out |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 09:27 PM |
#23 |
| -
By law she is a MINOR. Parents be damned. This asshole |
liquid diamond |
Apr-12-10 09:29 PM |
#26 |
| -
This asshole? You know him personally? |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 09:30 PM |
#28 |
| -
Anybody who would drive 3,000 miles to |
liquid diamond |
Apr-12-10 09:34 PM |
#30 |
| -
Anyone who would drive 3000 miles to see a girl sounds like a kid to me. |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 09:40 PM |
#32 |
| -
"See" a girl? Way to downplays this guy's sick intentions. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-12-10 09:47 PM |
#33 |
| -
Sex between young people is sick? Okay. |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 09:49 PM |
#34 |
| -
No. Sex between an adult and a minor is. n/t |
liquid diamond |
Apr-12-10 09:54 PM |
#36 |
| -
I see. |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 11:36 PM |
#45 |
| -
You have a dirty mind.. |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 05:00 AM |
#56 |
| -
If finding sex between an adult and a minor to be sick makes |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 09:42 PM |
#130 |
| -
Yea, if you characterize a |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 10:02 PM |
#136 |
| -
I'm shocked it took this long for somebody to makes the |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 10:12 PM |
#140 |
| -
If the shoe fits... |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 10:27 PM |
#142 |
| -
That's what I thought... |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 10:30 PM |
#143 |
| -
There is zero evidence that this young women was abused in any way. |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 10:47 PM |
#146 |
| -
Letting laws decide your ethics is ridiculous. |
Threedifferentones |
Apr-13-10 09:09 AM |
#73 |
| -
It is 2010. Why are you talking about Homer? |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 09:46 PM |
#131 |
| -
"It is 2010. Why are you talking about Homer?" You could make up a lot of those |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 11:15 PM |
#149 |
| -
My, my....how we've changed.... |
Lagomorph |
Apr-13-10 10:02 PM |
#137 |
| -
24 and 17? |
CreekDog |
Apr-14-10 01:44 PM |
#163 |
| -
I am amused and sickened at the same time |
Codeine |
Apr-13-10 04:45 AM |
#55 |
| -
I'm not talking about anywhere else in the civilized world. I live in the U.S.A. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 09:51 PM |
#132 |
| -
"Child abuser"? |
Codeine |
Apr-13-10 10:23 PM |
#141 |
| -
I'm happy you are not a legislator. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 10:31 PM |
#144 |
| -
You have a strange definition of a "child abuser" or "sick intentions" |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 06:34 PM |
#117 |
| -
I don't approve of sex between an adult and a minor. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 09:54 PM |
#133 |
| -
So if the age of consent in California was brought in line with 78% |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 11:12 PM |
#148 |
| -
Right on brother |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 06:31 PM |
#116 |
| -
Unless that person is ALSO a minor. n/t |
Ian David |
Apr-13-10 07:17 AM |
#70 |
| -
So, it started when he was 20 and she was 13? |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:00 AM |
#80 |
| -
You really should read the article |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 01:23 PM |
#105 |
| -
I was taking college classes at 17 |
Mojorabbit |
Apr-13-10 03:59 AM |
#53 |
| -
I was doing half day at high school, and a half day at college |
snooper2 |
Apr-13-10 10:14 AM |
#77 |
| -
13 and 20 sounds a lot worse, doesn't it? |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:03 AM |
#82 |
| -
How about when you were 13? |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:11 AM |
#85 |
| -
You are right but 17 is too old. |
bamacrat |
Apr-13-10 08:55 AM |
#72 |
| -
Send your recommendations to your congressman or congresswoman. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 09:57 PM |
#134 |
| -
Eh, I'd rather get pot legalized. |
bamacrat |
Apr-14-10 12:19 AM |
#152 |
| -
Stop pretending law and ethics are the same |
Threedifferentones |
Apr-14-10 04:37 PM |
#165 |
| -
According to Reply 74, it's now 16, not 14. |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 10:59 AM |
#79 |
| -
So pedophilia is OK if a kid is older than 11, "almost" an adult? |
damntexdem |
Apr-12-10 05:46 PM |
#3 |
| -
Wait, what? |
XemaSab |
Apr-12-10 05:59 PM |
#6 |
| -
Gilroy is known for its garlic festival. |
eagertolearn |
Apr-12-10 06:31 PM |
#11 |
| -
I must admit, this is one post I did not expect to see in this thread. |
rug |
Apr-12-10 10:25 PM |
#38 |
| -
But if an 18 year-old has sex with a 17 year-old, is he a pedophile? |
villager |
Apr-12-10 06:03 PM |
#8 |
| -
It sounds like something a kid would do, doesn't it? |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 08:14 PM |
#17 |
| -
Pedophilia is the attraction to pre-pubescent children. |
foxfeet |
Apr-12-10 07:09 PM |
#13 |
| -
Apparently, he was first attracted to her when she was 13 and he was 20. |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:02 AM |
#81 |
| -
Still not pedophilia. |
foxfeet |
Apr-13-10 06:18 PM |
#114 |
| -
He's only 24. HIs brain isn't even finished developing yet. |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 08:08 PM |
#16 |
| -
Neither has her mind developed fully, which is the whole point of statutory rape laws. |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:09 AM |
#84 |
| -
You are embroidering. How do you know "he's been waiting" ? |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 10:51 PM |
#147 |
| -
My Grandfather Married at 22 |
NashVegas |
Apr-15-10 11:08 AM |
#169 |
| -
Finally. A voice of reason in this twisted thread. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 09:58 PM |
#135 |
| -
Both of you need to look up the word to see what it means. n/t |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 10:42 PM |
#145 |
| -
The contact started when she was 13, and he was 20. |
boppers |
Apr-12-10 06:10 PM |
#9 |
| -
but there was no sexual contact then? So whats the point of your post? |
provis99 |
Apr-13-10 01:24 AM |
#51 |
| -
If you don't think it's creepy for a 20 to be grooming a 13, I don't know what to say. |
boppers |
Apr-13-10 05:04 AM |
#57 |
| -
Never been on Facebook huh? |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 05:15 AM |
#59 |
| -
My god-daughters are on facebook. |
boppers |
Apr-13-10 05:21 AM |
#60 |
| -
Ok grandma/pa |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 05:31 AM |
#62 |
| -
Congrats on your ignorance. |
boppers |
Apr-13-10 05:57 AM |
#65 |
| -
Kids have always been stupid..er..done stupid things |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 06:19 AM |
#66 |
| -
How about the online culture of 13 year olds and 20 year olds. |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:14 AM |
#86 |
| -
Notice there was no real contact or relationship at that point? |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 01:11 PM |
#100 |
| -
Is it just me or are people much more uptight than they were twenty years ago? |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 01:15 PM |
#102 |
| -
I think they are more uptight than they have been |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 01:19 PM |
#103 |
| -
And maybe he wasn't at the time. You know that 13 year old girls |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 01:13 PM |
#101 |
| -
My little sister couldn't stop laughing at me when she found out |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 06:46 PM |
#119 |
| -
I didn't realize you were supervising and recording all of their contact |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 06:43 PM |
#118 |
| -
No physical contact, or so they say. "The heart wants what it wants" Woody Allen. |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:05 AM |
#83 |
| -
You said "physical", not me, the article if you chose to read it |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 01:28 PM |
#106 |
| -
Isn't that the plot to "Daddy Longlegs"? |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 01:34 PM |
#108 |
| -
I agree with you here. Besides, a relationship that lasts that long |
icee |
Apr-12-10 08:04 PM |
#14 |
| -
Damn that 13 year old, egging on a 20 year old for four years, until he could not help |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:17 AM |
#87 |
| -
There is NOTHING suggesting that they have been doing this for four years. |
Xithras |
Apr-13-10 01:33 PM |
#107 |
| -
I think you're going overboard in foul interpretation of that which |
icee |
Apr-13-10 03:15 PM |
#113 |
| -
Where does it say they were in a relationship for the last four years? |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 06:54 PM |
#120 |
| -
That "is" a relationship. |
icee |
Apr-13-10 11:34 PM |
#150 |
| -
I am not in a relationship with 257 people |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 11:39 PM |
#151 |
| -
Relationship is also "the way one feels about another", not simply |
icee |
Apr-14-10 08:20 AM |
#158 |
| -
You're assuming quite a bit about me |
tburnsten |
Apr-14-10 01:20 PM |
#160 |
| -
You didn't explain how you see me being in a relationship with |
tburnsten |
Apr-14-10 06:08 PM |
#166 |
| -
They lost contact |
muriel_volestrangler |
Apr-14-10 04:14 AM |
#154 |
| -
My initial post said simply "relationship". Subsequent posts |
icee |
Apr-14-10 08:08 AM |
#157 |
| -
It's nice to know someone else on this board can read |
tburnsten |
Apr-14-10 01:24 PM |
#161 |
| -
When I was 17, my boyfriend was 24. |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 08:06 PM |
#15 |
| -
When I was 17 |
creeksneakers2 |
Apr-12-10 09:14 PM |
#20 |
| -
When I was 17, there were a lot of guys coming back from Viet Nam |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 09:26 PM |
#22 |
| -
What's his name, address & local police department? n/t |
24601 |
Apr-12-10 10:38 PM |
#40 |
| -
DU authoritarians untie! |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 11:38 PM |
#46 |
| -
"untie", that's brilliant! |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 06:57 PM |
#121 |
| -
It's a revision of an old joke, "Dyslexics untie!" for "unite". n/t |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 08:49 PM |
#128 |
| -
When you were 13, was your boyfriend 20? |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:18 AM |
#88 |
| -
Somewhere he was. |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 12:57 PM |
#98 |
| -
owned |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 06:59 PM |
#122 |
| -
Photo of Mr. DeBruyn |
WillParkinson |
Apr-12-10 06:01 PM |
#7 |
| -
He looks like a Senators fan |
Doctor_J |
Apr-13-10 09:42 AM |
#76 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Apr-12-10 06:11 PM |
#10 |
| -
So? |
droidamus2 |
Apr-12-10 08:30 PM |
#18 |
| -
Well said. |
DeSwiss |
Apr-12-10 08:56 PM |
#19 |
| -
Comparing murder and sex with minors is kind of a stretch |
liquid diamond |
Apr-12-10 09:28 PM |
#24 |
| -
Less of a stretch than calling a 17 year old a child. |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 09:29 PM |
#27 |
| -
17 is a minor. Under 18 is a minor. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-12-10 09:33 PM |
#29 |
| -
So, what does that mean to you? |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 09:38 PM |
#31 |
| -
I've said it several times. It means a line has been clearly drawn. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-12-10 09:53 PM |
#35 |
| -
Okay. |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 11:36 PM |
#44 |
| -
Yet the laws which were written were picked and chosen |
The2ndWheel |
Apr-13-10 05:22 AM |
#61 |
| -
well, no. In some states, age of consent is 16. |
provis99 |
Apr-13-10 01:23 AM |
#50 |
| -
However, it would have been legal for them to marry with the parents' consent |
muriel_volestrangler |
Apr-13-10 04:37 AM |
#54 |
| -
The line is clear. No sex with a 17 year old unless married to him or her. |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:26 AM |
#91 |
| -
I'd believe him if he said he didn't know it was illegal |
muriel_volestrangler |
Apr-13-10 01:20 PM |
#104 |
| -
Gilroy is not a bastion of liberalism. n/t |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 01:35 PM |
#109 |
| -
Thank you no elephants. |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 10:03 PM |
#138 |
| -
Wrong comparison |
droidamus2 |
Apr-13-10 12:53 AM |
#49 |
| -
Are you assuming something is wrong with setting different minimum ages for |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:42 AM |
#92 |
| -
You still haven't read the article have you? |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 07:16 PM |
#123 |
| -
No |
droidamus2 |
Apr-13-10 08:26 PM |
#127 |
| -
"Comparing murder and sex with minors is kind of a stretch" WTF? |
boppers |
Apr-13-10 05:41 AM |
#63 |
| -
Sure thing bub, consentual sex between a young adult and a 17 year old |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 07:19 PM |
#124 |
| -
What are you talking about? |
liquid diamond |
Apr-13-10 10:07 PM |
#139 |
| -
Some stats: |
boppers |
Apr-14-10 02:19 AM |
#153 |
| -
If you don't see a major difference between a nine year old and a 17 year old |
tburnsten |
Apr-14-10 01:33 PM |
#162 |
| -
Reading is fun! |
boppers |
Apr-14-10 11:27 PM |
#168 |
| -
I went by the median figure YOU posted |
tburnsten |
Apr-15-10 08:49 PM |
#171 |
| -
No kidding. n/t |
EFerrari |
Apr-12-10 09:28 PM |
#25 |
| -
Um, what about a 24 year old who breaks the law? |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:20 AM |
#89 |
| -
You didn't bother to read the article did you? |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 07:20 PM |
#125 |
| -
In most US states, this would have been perfectly legal. |
Xithras |
Apr-13-10 01:45 PM |
#110 |
| -
Canadian Armed Forces? |
onager |
Apr-12-10 10:00 PM |
#37 |
| -
And maple syrup grenades. |
proteus_lives |
Apr-12-10 11:31 PM |
#43 |
| -
I guess Canada should spend as much as the US, huh? |
time_has_come |
Apr-13-10 12:14 AM |
#47 |
| -
Which is why the Canadians could never have defeated |
golfguru |
Apr-13-10 02:55 AM |
#52 |
| -
Oh, you'll do well here, |
Dogtown |
Apr-13-10 06:58 AM |
#67 |
| -
Don't like him picking on your darling |
tburnsten |
Apr-13-10 07:22 PM |
#126 |
| -
What are you going on about? |
Dogtown |
Apr-14-10 05:53 AM |
#156 |
| -
Yeah, Canadians were NEVER there for any battle, eh? |
Darth_Kitten |
Apr-14-10 10:05 AM |
#159 |
| -
I never said that Canadians never helped...I was replying to |
golfguru |
Apr-14-10 11:23 PM |
#167 |
| -
I'm just being saucy. |
Darth_Kitten |
Apr-15-10 05:04 PM |
#170 |
| -
A simple $ and population comparison is as simplistic as what you CLAIM an |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:51 AM |
#94 |
| -
The only issue here is the age of the beaver. |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:21 AM |
#90 |
| -
Damn |
guitar man |
Apr-12-10 10:40 PM |
#41 |
| -
If you were a 24 year old male, |
ronnie624 |
Apr-13-10 12:40 AM |
#48 |
| -
Yeah I guess I've forgotten |
guitar man |
Apr-13-10 08:04 AM |
#71 |
| -
The paper should be ashamed |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 05:08 AM |
#58 |
| -
A true story |
pipoman |
Apr-13-10 05:44 AM |
#64 |
| -
I think the age of consent should be whatever age you need to be to have a driver's license. n/t |
Ian David |
Apr-13-10 07:13 AM |
#68 |
| -
That's really up to the state legislators and the people who elect them. |
No Elephants |
Apr-13-10 11:47 AM |
#93 |
| -
What a fucking moron... |
Ian David |
Apr-13-10 07:16 AM |
#69 |
| -
Please have a seat. |
slackmaster |
Apr-13-10 09:34 AM |
#75 |
| -
As he's neither a priest nor a teacher... |
LanternWaste |
Apr-13-10 10:51 AM |
#78 |
| -
The headline may be bullshit for all we know. Yeah, it sounds overblown to me. |
EFerrari |
Apr-13-10 01:07 PM |
#99 |
| -
Strange responses in this thread - apparently it's akin to pedophilia |
BR_Parkway |
Apr-13-10 02:24 PM |
#112 |
| -
A simple fact: sometimes the law is wrong. -nt |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Apr-13-10 06:28 PM |
#115 |
| -
We are so hung up on this 'sex' thing in this country... |
hayu_lol |
Apr-13-10 09:39 PM |
#129 |
| -
I'd suggest 16. -nt |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Apr-14-10 05:30 AM |
#155 |
| -
that makes sense. we are all for the right to have an abortion at any age (mostly) but a 24 yr old |
Divine Discontent |
Apr-14-10 01:48 PM |
#164 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
