You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: and what would be the grounds for impeachment? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
55. and what would be the grounds for impeachment?
Phelps is despicable scum. But the fact that the prevailing party is despicable scum is not generally grounds for departing from the standard rule (Fed Rule Appellate Procedure Rule 39) providing for the award of costs to the prevailing party in an appeal. The court has broad, but not unbridled, discretion, in deciding whether to depart from the standard rule. The fact that the winning side deserves to rot in hell for an eternity is, unfortunately, not the sort of grounds on which a court usually bases this sort of decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC