proteus_lives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-27-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #67 |
| 72. Do you really think we should have let South Korea be overwhelmed? |
| -S.Korean ship sinking with 100 on board, North attack suspected |
pampango |
Mar-26-10 09:53 AM |
#0 |
 -
gulf of tonkin nt |
msongs |
Mar-26-10 09:55 AM |
#1 |
 -
no. no one wants war with north korea. |
Teaser |
Mar-26-10 09:58 AM |
#3 |
 -
I tend to disagree with you. I believe the Right very much wants a "war" |
Winterblues |
Mar-26-10 10:43 AM |
#16 |
| -
oh, some of their crazies do |
Teaser |
Mar-26-10 07:07 PM |
#50 |
| -
The Right might want a war with them, but the Military does not |
jmowreader |
Mar-27-10 09:54 AM |
#63 |
| -
But they don't have technology |
treestar |
Mar-27-10 12:09 PM |
#69 |
| -
No, Gulf of Tonkin was fictional. |
RaleighNCDUer |
Mar-26-10 10:06 AM |
#4 |
| -
Too bad the article has so little information. Anyone know of good streaming SK English news.... |
Poll_Blind |
Mar-26-10 09:56 AM |
#2 |
| -
Don't know that, but here's an update from the Washington Post. |
pampango |
Mar-26-10 10:14 AM |
#7 |
| -
Just google... |
hayu_lol |
Mar-26-10 10:17 AM |
#9 |
| -
Do you think the SK ships were trying to intercept the Iranian-bound NK vessel? |
Adsos Letter |
Mar-26-10 11:35 AM |
#25 |
| -
Who knows but I bet every sub fielded by N Korea |
Pavulon |
Mar-26-10 12:54 PM |
#43 |
| -
This is scary |
UndertheOcean |
Mar-26-10 10:10 AM |
#5 |
| -
technically, an act of war, |
mahatmakanejeeves |
Mar-26-10 10:15 AM |
#8 |
| -
I agree, deeply concerning. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Mar-26-10 10:27 AM |
#12 |
| -
Crap. |
crim son |
Mar-26-10 10:12 AM |
#6 |
| -
There are a very large number of US troops |
Pavulon |
Mar-26-10 10:19 AM |
#10 |
| -
Then we should get them home |
whats_a_zip |
Mar-26-10 10:33 AM |
#13 |
| -
Unfortunately, it would become our fight. |
Akoto |
Mar-26-10 10:41 AM |
#14 |
| -
What obligation? |
whats_a_zip |
Mar-26-10 10:42 AM |
#15 |
| -
You can't be serious. |
Akoto |
Mar-26-10 10:45 AM |
#18 |
| -
So you do want to die for South Korea? |
whats_a_zip |
Mar-26-10 10:49 AM |
#19 |
| -
You have no Idea |
cowman |
Mar-26-10 11:23 AM |
#23 |
| -
NK has massive artillary aimed directly at Seoul. My In-laws are in Seoul. |
yodermon |
Mar-26-10 11:55 AM |
#28 |
| -
Are you 12? |
proteus_lives |
Mar-26-10 12:32 PM |
#37 |
| -
I know the U.S. has a lengthy HISTORY of aggressive imperialism, |
ronnie624 |
Mar-27-10 12:23 AM |
#55 |
| -
Actually, it' Japan, China, Russia, North Korea. |
proteus_lives |
Mar-27-10 03:29 AM |
#62 |
| -
And then, out of a sense of genuine altruism and global responsibility, |
ronnie624 |
Mar-27-10 11:55 AM |
#67 |
| -
Do you really think we should have let South Korea be overwhelmed? |
proteus_lives |
Mar-27-10 01:15 PM |
#72 |
| -
I don't know. |
ronnie624 |
Mar-27-10 01:32 PM |
#73 |
| -
What are you talking about? |
proteus_lives |
Mar-27-10 01:36 PM |
#74 |
| -
NATO, you mean nato right? |
Pavulon |
Mar-27-10 10:05 AM |
#64 |
| -
Yeah, that's the ticket, NATO did it. |
ronnie624 |
Mar-27-10 11:59 AM |
#68 |
| -
10 years is not immediate. This aint chavez friend |
Pavulon |
Mar-27-10 12:32 PM |
#70 |
| -
The division of Korea |
ronnie624 |
Mar-27-10 12:45 PM |
#71 |
| -
Opposed because they did want to live in a communist state? |
Pavulon |
Mar-28-10 01:53 PM |
#77 |
| -
No but there are plenty who are ready to kill for it. |
Pavulon |
Mar-26-10 12:48 PM |
#39 |
| -
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.... |
citizen snips |
Mar-26-10 12:50 PM |
#41 |
| -
Have our troops been killing people? |
crim son |
Mar-26-10 12:17 PM |
#33 |
| -
He was referring to Ohio class sub as a "nation killer" |
Statistical |
Mar-27-10 12:29 AM |
#56 |
| -
I'm sure cooler heads will prevail, right? |
AngryAmish |
Mar-26-10 10:22 AM |
#11 |
| -
I'm not so sure. |
nc4bo |
Mar-26-10 10:44 AM |
#17 |
| -
I,m trying to recall the last time an event of this magnitutde occurred there... |
Adsos Letter |
Mar-26-10 11:34 AM |
#24 |
| -
January 23, 1968, NK captured the U.S.S. Pueblo |
GreenStormCloud |
Mar-26-10 02:39 PM |
#45 |
| -
Historically, they do scrap a bit then cool off. The stakes are pretty high otherwise.n/t |
Poll_Blind |
Mar-26-10 10:51 AM |
#20 |
| -
I've read a couple of reports on Google news that the ship has sunk |
IScreamSundays |
Mar-26-10 11:04 AM |
#21 |
| -
Yeah, there's a bit of confusion also about how many SK ships were involved (1 or 2).n/t |
Poll_Blind |
Mar-26-10 11:10 AM |
#22 |
| -
There are some serious wing-nuts commenting on that site. |
Uncle Joe |
Mar-27-10 11:01 AM |
#66 |
| -
So are the 104 people dead? Were they saved? |
superconnected |
Mar-26-10 11:39 AM |
#26 |
| -
I was just looking at AP news; sounds like they have rescued almost 60 crew at this point |
Adsos Letter |
Mar-26-10 11:45 AM |
#27 |
| -
Thank you, that's the new's I really want to hear on this one, at this point. |
superconnected |
Mar-26-10 04:00 PM |
#47 |
| -
UPDATE |
Adsos Letter |
Mar-26-10 11:59 AM |
#29 |
| -
A flock of birds? |
davidthegnome |
Mar-26-10 12:07 PM |
#32 |
| -
They might have showed up as a radar return. A big enough group of birds... |
Poll_Blind |
Mar-26-10 12:19 PM |
#34 |
| -
That makes sense |
davidthegnome |
Mar-26-10 12:23 PM |
#36 |
| -
even if the flock was big enough to cause a blip, certainly it wasn't |
Blue_Tires |
Mar-27-10 12:21 AM |
#54 |
| -
Targets beyond visual can never be identified foe. |
Statistical |
Mar-27-10 12:32 AM |
#57 |
| -
Was a weather balloon and Venus involved as well? |
Phoonzang |
Mar-26-10 02:51 PM |
#46 |
| -
This is one reason why we should NEVER have been in Iraq! |
ColesCountyDem |
Mar-26-10 12:02 PM |
#30 |
| -
There are resources available to deal with this |
Pavulon |
Mar-26-10 12:50 PM |
#40 |
| -
Perhaps, but perhaps not. |
ColesCountyDem |
Mar-26-10 04:24 PM |
#48 |
| -
No, no matter what they do they will loose. |
Pavulon |
Mar-26-10 06:34 PM |
#49 |
| -
I never said they wouldn't lose. |
ColesCountyDem |
Mar-27-10 12:04 AM |
#53 |
| -
The troops in South Korea are essentially a speed bump |
Statistical |
Mar-27-10 12:36 AM |
#58 |
| -
Let's hope this is an accident or misunderstanding |
davidthegnome |
Mar-26-10 12:04 PM |
#31 |
| -
Dammit. This is a horrible devlopment. Another link: |
tekisui |
Mar-26-10 12:20 PM |
#35 |
| -
Don't worry about this |
CLANG |
Mar-26-10 12:39 PM |
#38 |
| -
Game theory relies on both parties being sane |
Pavulon |
Mar-26-10 12:52 PM |
#42 |
| -
Of course it's possible, but not very likely |
CLANG |
Mar-26-10 01:37 PM |
#44 |
| -
I think for the 40+ who already died it has already gotten out of hand. n/t |
Statistical |
Mar-27-10 12:38 AM |
#59 |
| -
AP: SKorean naval ship sinks near NKorea; 46 missing (10 pm) |
Snazzy |
Mar-26-10 09:07 PM |
#51 |
| -
NKorea threatens 'nuclear strikes' on SKorea, US (6am Friday) |
Snazzy |
Mar-26-10 09:18 PM |
#52 |
| -
... But by dawn, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said they could not conclude that the reclusive |
struggle4progress |
Mar-27-10 12:39 AM |
#60 |
| -
'U.S. has no evidence on N.K.'s involvement' |
struggle4progress |
Mar-27-10 12:41 AM |
#61 |
| -
Sounds pretty reasonable. Best to be sure.. Norks already threatening |
Pavulon |
Mar-27-10 10:09 AM |
#65 |
| -
Did you fashion that term yourself? "Norks"? |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Mar-27-10 04:47 PM |
#75 |
| -
It's a british term for North Koreans. |
CLANG |
Mar-27-10 09:08 PM |
#76 |
| -
NORth + Korea |
Pavulon |
Mar-28-10 01:56 PM |
#78 |
| -
god i hope this doesn't mean war |
tedk_355 |
Mar-29-10 01:47 PM |
#79 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread