You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: A flock of birds? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. A flock of birds?
Were tensions sky high or did we have a trigger happy Captain or....?

I'm not that well versed in naval combat or even naval vessels, but it just strikes me as kind of ridiculous that a flock of birds could be mistaken as a dangerous enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -S.Korean ship sinking with 100 on board, North attack suspected pampango  Mar-26-10 09:53 AM   #0 
  - gulf of tonkin nt  msongs   Mar-26-10 09:55 AM   #1 
  - no. no one wants war with north korea.  Teaser   Mar-26-10 09:58 AM   #3 
  - I tend to disagree with you. I believe the Right very much wants a "war"  Winterblues   Mar-26-10 10:43 AM   #16 
     - oh, some of their crazies do  Teaser   Mar-26-10 07:07 PM   #50 
     - The Right might want a war with them, but the Military does not  jmowreader   Mar-27-10 09:54 AM   #63 
        - But they don't have technology  treestar   Mar-27-10 12:09 PM   #69 
  - No, Gulf of Tonkin was fictional.  RaleighNCDUer   Mar-26-10 10:06 AM   #4 
  - Too bad the article has so little information. Anyone know of good streaming SK English news....  Poll_Blind   Mar-26-10 09:56 AM   #2 
  - Don't know that, but here's an update from the Washington Post.  pampango   Mar-26-10 10:14 AM   #7 
  - Just google...  hayu_lol   Mar-26-10 10:17 AM   #9 
     - Do you think the SK ships were trying to intercept the Iranian-bound NK vessel?  Adsos Letter   Mar-26-10 11:35 AM   #25 
        - Who knows but I bet every sub fielded by N Korea  Pavulon   Mar-26-10 12:54 PM   #43 
  - This is scary  UndertheOcean   Mar-26-10 10:10 AM   #5 
  - technically, an act of war,  mahatmakanejeeves   Mar-26-10 10:15 AM   #8 
  - I agree, deeply concerning. nt  ZombieHorde   Mar-26-10 10:27 AM   #12 
  - Crap.  crim son   Mar-26-10 10:12 AM   #6 
  - There are a very large number of US troops  Pavulon   Mar-26-10 10:19 AM   #10 
     - Then we should get them home  whats_a_zip   Mar-26-10 10:33 AM   #13 
     - Unfortunately, it would become our fight.  Akoto   Mar-26-10 10:41 AM   #14 
        - What obligation?  whats_a_zip   Mar-26-10 10:42 AM   #15 
           - You can't be serious.  Akoto   Mar-26-10 10:45 AM   #18 
              - So you do want to die for South Korea?  whats_a_zip   Mar-26-10 10:49 AM   #19 
                 - You have no Idea  cowman   Mar-26-10 11:23 AM   #23 
                 - NK has massive artillary aimed directly at Seoul. My In-laws are in Seoul.  yodermon   Mar-26-10 11:55 AM   #28 
                 - Are you 12?  proteus_lives   Mar-26-10 12:32 PM   #37 
                 - I know the U.S. has a lengthy HISTORY of aggressive imperialism,  ronnie624   Mar-27-10 12:23 AM   #55 
                    - Actually, it' Japan, China, Russia, North Korea.  proteus_lives   Mar-27-10 03:29 AM   #62 
                    - And then, out of a sense of genuine altruism and global responsibility,  ronnie624   Mar-27-10 11:55 AM   #67 
                       - Do you really think we should have let South Korea be overwhelmed?  proteus_lives   Mar-27-10 01:15 PM   #72 
                          - I don't know.  ronnie624   Mar-27-10 01:32 PM   #73 
                             - What are you talking about?  proteus_lives   Mar-27-10 01:36 PM   #74 
                    - NATO, you mean nato right?  Pavulon   Mar-27-10 10:05 AM   #64 
                       - Yeah, that's the ticket, NATO did it.  ronnie624   Mar-27-10 11:59 AM   #68 
                          - 10 years is not immediate. This aint chavez friend  Pavulon   Mar-27-10 12:32 PM   #70 
                             - The division of Korea  ronnie624   Mar-27-10 12:45 PM   #71 
                                - Opposed because they did want to live in a communist state?  Pavulon   Mar-28-10 01:53 PM   #77 
                 - No but there are plenty who are ready to kill for it.  Pavulon   Mar-26-10 12:48 PM   #39 
                 - "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country....  citizen snips   Mar-26-10 12:50 PM   #41 
     - Have our troops been killing people?  crim son   Mar-26-10 12:17 PM   #33 
        - He was referring to Ohio class sub as a "nation killer"  Statistical   Mar-27-10 12:29 AM   #56 
  - I'm sure cooler heads will prevail, right?  AngryAmish   Mar-26-10 10:22 AM   #11 
  - I'm not so sure.  nc4bo   Mar-26-10 10:44 AM   #17 
  - I,m trying to recall the last time an event of this magnitutde occurred there...  Adsos Letter   Mar-26-10 11:34 AM   #24 
     - January 23, 1968, NK captured the U.S.S. Pueblo  GreenStormCloud   Mar-26-10 02:39 PM   #45 
  - Historically, they do scrap a bit then cool off. The stakes are pretty high otherwise.n/t  Poll_Blind   Mar-26-10 10:51 AM   #20 
  - I've read a couple of reports on Google news that the ship has sunk  IScreamSundays   Mar-26-10 11:04 AM   #21 
  - Yeah, there's a bit of confusion also about how many SK ships were involved (1 or 2).n/t  Poll_Blind   Mar-26-10 11:10 AM   #22 
  - There are some serious wing-nuts commenting on that site.  Uncle Joe   Mar-27-10 11:01 AM   #66 
  - So are the 104 people dead? Were they saved?  superconnected   Mar-26-10 11:39 AM   #26 
  - I was just looking at AP news; sounds like they have rescued almost 60 crew at this point  Adsos Letter   Mar-26-10 11:45 AM   #27 
     - Thank you, that's the new's I really want to hear on this one, at this point.  superconnected   Mar-26-10 04:00 PM   #47 
  - UPDATE  Adsos Letter   Mar-26-10 11:59 AM   #29 
  - A flock of birds?  davidthegnome   Mar-26-10 12:07 PM   #32 
  - They might have showed up as a radar return. A big enough group of birds...  Poll_Blind   Mar-26-10 12:19 PM   #34 
     - That makes sense  davidthegnome   Mar-26-10 12:23 PM   #36 
     - even if the flock was big enough to cause a blip, certainly it wasn't  Blue_Tires   Mar-27-10 12:21 AM   #54 
        - Targets beyond visual can never be identified foe.  Statistical   Mar-27-10 12:32 AM   #57 
  - Was a weather balloon and Venus involved as well?  Phoonzang   Mar-26-10 02:51 PM   #46 
  - This is one reason why we should NEVER have been in Iraq!  ColesCountyDem   Mar-26-10 12:02 PM   #30 
  - There are resources available to deal with this  Pavulon   Mar-26-10 12:50 PM   #40 
     - Perhaps, but perhaps not.  ColesCountyDem   Mar-26-10 04:24 PM   #48 
        - No, no matter what they do they will loose.  Pavulon   Mar-26-10 06:34 PM   #49 
        - I never said they wouldn't lose.  ColesCountyDem   Mar-27-10 12:04 AM   #53 
        - The troops in South Korea are essentially a speed bump  Statistical   Mar-27-10 12:36 AM   #58 
  - Let's hope this is an accident or misunderstanding  davidthegnome   Mar-26-10 12:04 PM   #31 
  - Dammit. This is a horrible devlopment. Another link:  tekisui   Mar-26-10 12:20 PM   #35 
  - Don't worry about this  CLANG   Mar-26-10 12:39 PM   #38 
  - Game theory relies on both parties being sane  Pavulon   Mar-26-10 12:52 PM   #42 
  - Of course it's possible, but not very likely  CLANG   Mar-26-10 01:37 PM   #44 
  - I think for the 40+ who already died it has already gotten out of hand. n/t  Statistical   Mar-27-10 12:38 AM   #59 
  - AP: SKorean naval ship sinks near NKorea; 46 missing (10 pm)  Snazzy   Mar-26-10 09:07 PM   #51 
  - NKorea threatens 'nuclear strikes' on SKorea, US (6am Friday)  Snazzy   Mar-26-10 09:18 PM   #52 
  - ... But by dawn, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said they could not conclude that the reclusive  struggle4progress   Mar-27-10 12:39 AM   #60 
  - 'U.S. has no evidence on N.K.'s involvement'  struggle4progress   Mar-27-10 12:41 AM   #61 
  - Sounds pretty reasonable. Best to be sure.. Norks already threatening  Pavulon   Mar-27-10 10:09 AM   #65 
     - Did you fashion that term yourself? "Norks"?  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Mar-27-10 04:47 PM   #75 
        - It's a british term for North Koreans.  CLANG   Mar-27-10 09:08 PM   #76 
        - NORth + Korea  Pavulon   Mar-28-10 01:56 PM   #78 
  - god i hope this doesn't mean war  tedk_355   Mar-29-10 01:47 PM   #79 
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC