EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-30-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| -Italy follows France with a bid to ban the burqa |
dipsydoodle |
Jan-30-10 12:18 PM |
#0 |
 -
So, the prisons and fine coffers will fill with women were burqas |
Suji to Seoul |
Jan-30-10 01:04 PM |
#1 |
 -
Nikes should be banned anyway |
dipsydoodle |
Jan-30-10 01:28 PM |
#3 |
 -
And how does banning the burqa equal racism? |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 04:28 PM |
#15 |
| -
You're defending this act of racism? Tread carefully. |
Suji to Seoul |
Jan-30-10 09:00 PM |
#30 |
| -
You didn't answer my question |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 09:07 PM |
#32 |
| -
this is targetting one group of people. Laws that target one group of people are inherently racist |
Suji to Seoul |
Jan-31-10 10:22 PM |
#96 |
| -
It isn't racism, and if you're going to tell people to tread carefully, become a mod or admin. |
Zavulon |
Jan-30-10 10:05 PM |
#50 |
| -
You're defending this act of racism? Tread carefully. |
Suji to Seoul |
Jan-30-10 09:01 PM |
#31 |
| -
We shouldn't tolerate intolerance |
Frosty cupcake |
Jan-30-10 01:27 PM |
#2 |
| -
I agree. Let's see the men walk around with a little hole cut out for their eyes. |
Raschel |
Jan-30-10 02:13 PM |
#5 |
| -
Right on. n/t |
EFerrari |
Jan-30-10 02:24 PM |
#8 |
| -
interesting proposition---I like it |
wordpix |
Jan-31-10 01:25 PM |
#89 |
| -
Agree . . . using male-supremacist religion to oppress women is as old as the OT... |
defendandprotect |
Jan-30-10 09:21 PM |
#37 |
| -
European rightists on the move! |
Flaneur |
Jan-30-10 02:03 PM |
#4 |
| -
How is fighting the making of women second class citizens |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 04:29 PM |
#16 |
| -
Humiliating women with a dress code is right wing. |
boppers |
Jan-30-10 05:35 PM |
#22 |
| -
The burqa is the "patriarchal dominance over women" |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 09:44 PM |
#47 |
| -
Dress codes are patriarchal dominance over women.... |
boppers |
Jan-30-10 10:30 PM |
#53 |
| -
I guess you're against health care for all |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 10:44 PM |
#58 |
| -
You're talking about national health care... with jail for private doctors. |
boppers |
Jan-30-10 11:25 PM |
#60 |
| -
This will probably be my final post on the subject |
Confusious |
Jan-31-10 01:15 AM |
#73 |
| -
You have no idea what you are talking about |
Confusious |
Jan-31-10 01:33 AM |
#78 |
| -
If I were a naturist, wouldn't you require me to wear clothes... |
JCMach1 |
Jan-30-10 11:11 PM |
#59 |
| -
See post above... no, I wouldn't require you to wear clothes. |
boppers |
Jan-30-10 11:32 PM |
#61 |
| -
Please note, I do question the RIGHTness of doing this |
JCMach1 |
Jan-30-10 11:41 PM |
#62 |
| -
Hadn't checked your profile for location..UAE, is it? |
boppers |
Jan-30-10 11:47 PM |
#63 |
| -
American working in UAE |
JCMach1 |
Jan-31-10 01:11 AM |
#72 |
| -
So I guess you want us to have religious practices in the town square |
Confusious |
Jan-31-10 01:17 AM |
#74 |
| -
Dictating behavhior in a commons space makes it a non-"commons" space. |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 01:58 AM |
#81 |
| -
80% of the women are suffering. the other 20% can wear it in their homes |
samsingh |
Jan-31-10 05:06 PM |
#93 |
| -
Good start, let's see the rest of the civilized world follow suit. (nt) |
Tumbulu |
Jan-30-10 02:17 PM |
#6 |
| -
Same here |
sasquatch |
Jan-30-10 06:40 PM |
#23 |
| -
Right! There are many Halloween costumes that need to be banned too! |
CLANG |
Jan-30-10 06:56 PM |
#24 |
| -
Yes. When women are pressured to wear certain costumes everyday, the costumes should be banned too. |
Chef Eric |
Jan-30-10 08:12 PM |
#27 |
| -
In France, panel recommends a burka ban in public institutions |
CLANG |
Jan-30-10 09:30 PM |
#41 |
| -
I'm pro-choice. Not my business what other people want to wear. |
Flaneur |
Jan-30-10 02:19 PM |
#7 |
| -
Are you ok |
dipsydoodle |
Jan-30-10 02:47 PM |
#9 |
| -
I'm pretty sure people can't choose to wear an honour killing... |
Violet_Crumble |
Jan-30-10 04:03 PM |
#12 |
| -
By coincidence |
dipsydoodle |
Jan-30-10 04:12 PM |
#13 |
| -
Honor Killings and making women subservient and destroying their identity ... |
defendandprotect |
Jan-30-10 09:25 PM |
#39 |
| -
Your topic line has the problem right in it |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 04:32 PM |
#18 |
| -
It is male-supremacist religions which will denying you that right to CHOICE . . |
defendandprotect |
Jan-30-10 09:24 PM |
#38 |
| -
there's still quite a few nuns around Italy |
mitchtv |
Jan-30-10 03:07 PM |
#10 |
| -
It's just the face covering |
Frosty cupcake |
Jan-30-10 04:01 PM |
#11 |
| -
That's a plain stupid analogy. |
dipsydoodle |
Jan-30-10 04:13 PM |
#14 |
| -
Now you bring up a point that is very sensitive... I wonder how that will go.. |
midnight |
Jan-30-10 10:13 PM |
#51 |
| -
This makes perfect sense |
zalinda |
Jan-30-10 04:30 PM |
#17 |
| -
I do not see a problem with this. |
conservdem |
Jan-30-10 05:01 PM |
#19 |
| -
Just what we needed. |
JoeyT |
Jan-30-10 05:16 PM |
#20 |
| -
Tefellin, Habits, robes, jewelry, why not just ban it all? |
boppers |
Jan-30-10 05:26 PM |
#21 |
| -
What do you mean "we"? The article is about a ban in Italy. "We" have nothing to do with it. nt |
Chef Eric |
Jan-30-10 07:37 PM |
#25 |
| -
We = Western societies. eom |
boppers |
Jan-30-10 08:06 PM |
#26 |
| -
All western societies are not the same. |
Chef Eric |
Jan-30-10 08:23 PM |
#29 |
| -
Maybe it's not clear to you |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 09:15 PM |
#34 |
| -
"It's about the oppression of women."... by societies and cultures who dictate clothing. |
boppers |
Jan-30-10 11:54 PM |
#64 |
| -
No relation |
Confusious |
Jan-31-10 01:29 AM |
#76 |
| -
You have no idea, yadda, yadda, yadda |
Confusious |
Jan-31-10 01:34 AM |
#79 |
| -
so i take it they are also going to ban |
Chicago dyke |
Jan-30-10 08:17 PM |
#28 |
| -
Nice |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 09:09 PM |
#33 |
| -
so do you think bikinis are "oppressive?" |
Chicago dyke |
Jan-30-10 09:18 PM |
#35 |
| -
Most women work really hard to get into a bikini |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 09:29 PM |
#40 |
| -
Islamic men don't cover their faces in public so there's nothing to ban. |
dustbunnie |
Jan-30-10 09:35 PM |
#43 |
| -
"Islamic men don't cover their faces in public" |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 12:02 AM |
#65 |
| -
Spin it any way you want, but you can't seriously think people are so dumb, do you? |
dustbunnie |
Jan-31-10 12:10 AM |
#68 |
| -
Did you mean "Islamic men in cooler, non-sandy, climates", then? |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 12:29 AM |
#70 |
| -
The usual spin, and that's all it is. |
dustbunnie |
Jan-31-10 12:44 AM |
#71 |
| -
Point by point: |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 01:21 AM |
#75 |
| -
OK, you have no idea what your talking about |
Confusious |
Jan-31-10 01:32 AM |
#77 |
| -
*you're |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 01:40 AM |
#80 |
| -
You're right. I don't see you and have no idea who you are. Therefore, we have no relationship. |
dustbunnie |
Jan-31-10 02:08 AM |
#83 |
| -
Our culture? |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 02:40 AM |
#84 |
| -
Yep, more complete and utter nonsense. |
dustbunnie |
Jan-31-10 03:18 AM |
#85 |
| -
Facial profiling.... hm. eom |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 02:53 PM |
#90 |
| -
Haha... you say facial expression is unimportant while you defend a culture that kills over it. |
dustbunnie |
Jan-31-10 03:16 PM |
#92 |
| -
Good for them -- more male-supremacist religious nonsense inflicted upon women!! |
defendandprotect |
Jan-30-10 09:19 PM |
#36 |
| -
the ignorance of muslim culture here is |
Chicago dyke |
Jan-30-10 09:31 PM |
#42 |
| -
Nobody gives a flying f*ck what anyone wears as long as they don't cover their faces. |
dustbunnie |
Jan-30-10 09:37 PM |
#44 |
| -
Nope. You need the help |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 09:38 PM |
#45 |
| -
i have a PhD in middle eastern religions. |
Chicago dyke |
Jan-30-10 09:48 PM |
#48 |
| -
I was wondering when you were going to say that |
Confusious |
Jan-30-10 09:58 PM |
#49 |
| -
you know what they say.... |
Scout |
Jan-31-10 09:05 PM |
#95 |
| -
And maybe we should have rethtought Chinese foot binding ... ?? |
defendandprotect |
Jan-30-10 09:43 PM |
#46 |
| -
Gang wear, indeed. |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 12:08 AM |
#67 |
| -
Our Constitution only separates us from the religous "gang" . . . |
defendandprotect |
Jan-31-10 11:12 AM |
#86 |
| -
In Chicago, a topless Aboriginal woman dressing per her culture and religion |
riderinthestorm |
Jan-30-10 10:17 PM |
#52 |
| -
good points....thanks for speaking out :) |
winyanstaz |
Jan-30-10 10:31 PM |
#54 |
| -
Damn, good post, I wish I had said that! n/t |
MicaelS |
Jan-30-10 10:36 PM |
#57 |
| -
So, Chicago is hopelessly screwed up and oppressive to human rights.... |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 12:15 AM |
#69 |
| -
Exactly . . . and if we wanted to argue for male-dominated religious culture, we'd |
defendandprotect |
Feb-01-10 09:24 PM |
#97 |
| -
it's about covering their faces |
unabelladonna |
Jan-30-10 10:32 PM |
#55 |
| -
Why do you hate ninjas? eom |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 12:06 AM |
#66 |
| -
Any of those others calling for women to cover their faces? |
MicaelS |
Jan-30-10 10:35 PM |
#56 |
| -
Jews wear three kinds of facial adornments. |
boppers |
Jan-31-10 02:06 AM |
#82 |
| -
"Muslim culture"? |
Codeine |
Jan-31-10 11:47 AM |
#87 |
| -
...and I guess Germany should have been "free to make up their own minds" |
defendandprotect |
Jan-31-10 07:39 PM |
#94 |
| -
I can't believe |
MilitarismFTL |
Jan-31-10 12:35 PM |
#88 |
| -
This invades individual freedom |
next left2 |
Jan-31-10 03:10 PM |
#91 |
| -
The only time I saw a woman in a burqa was in Italy. |
Courtesy Flush |
Feb-02-10 12:01 PM |
#98 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread